한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

패싯 분석 기법을 활용한 건설 시소러스 구축 방안에 관한 연구

A Study on Building Method of the Construction Industry Thesaurus Using Facet Analysis Method

  • 투고 : 2017.02.20
  • 심사 : 2017.03.22
  • 발행 : 2017.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

전통적으로 건설 산업 분야는 패싯 분석 기법을 활용한 대표적인 영역 중의 하나이다. 국제적으로 분류체계인 "건설정보통합분류법(Uniclass)"이나 시소러스인 "건설산업시소러스(Construction Industry Thesaurus, CIT)" 등에서 패싯 분석 기법을 적용하고 있다. 국내의 경우, 분류체계인 "건설정보분류체계" 등에 활용되고 있으나 시소러스에서의 패싯 분석 기법의 연구나 구축 사례는 찾아보기 힘들다. 본 연구의 목적은 패싯 분석 기법을 활용한 건설 분야의 정보검색을 위한 시소러스의 구축을 상정하여 패싯 유형을 확립하고, 패싯 분석 기법에 따른 건설 분야 시소러스의 구축 방안을 제시하는데에 있다. 기본 패싯으로 최상위 10개의 패싯(주체 및 수동체, 인공물, 추상물, 재료, 부품/구성요소, 공종, 속성, 매체, 프로세스, 공간, 시간)과 하위 20개의 패싯을 설립하고, 국제표준(ISO 25964-1)이 제시하고 있는 시소러스 구축 절차에 따른 구축 방안을 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 패싯 기반 시소러스의 적용뿐만 아니라 향후 택사노미나 온톨로지 등에서의 재활용 및 건설 분야의 분류체계 등과의 상호운용성에 활용이 가능할 것으로 기대하고 있다.

Traditionally, the construction industry field is one of the typical fields using facet analysis method. Internationally the facet analysis method is applied to the classification scheme "Uniclass" or thesaurus "Construction Industry Thesaurus(CIT)". In the case of Korea, the facet analysis method is being used in classification scheme "Construction Industry Classification System" but it is difficult to find studies on facet analysis method in thesaurus or building case study. This study aims to establish facet types by introducing building of thesaurus for information retrieval in construction field using facet analysis method and to suggest building plan of thesaurus in construction field using facet analysis method. In this paper, We establish the 11 top facets(agent/patient, artifacts, abstract, material, parts/component, works, attribute, media, process, space, time) and the 13 subfacet as rudimental facets and suggest building plan according to thesaurus building procedure which is suggested by International Standard(ISO 25964-1). The result of this study is expected to apply to facet based thesaurus. And it is also expected to reuse in Taxonomy or Ontology etc. and to use in interoperability with the classification scheme of Construction filed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chang, Inho. 2013. "A Study on Ontological Conceptual Definition of "Facility". "The Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(3): 199-216. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.3.199
  2. Choi, Yoon Kyung and Chung, Yeon-Kyoung. 2015. "A Study on Developing Facets for Subject Headings in Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information, 49(4): 179-201. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.179
  3. Choi, Yoon Kyung. 2015. A Study of Developing a Facet Application Model of Subject Headings in Korea. Ph. D. diss., The Graduate School Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  4. Chung, Yeon-Kyoung. 2013. "A Study on Structure of a Faceted Classification for Organizing Korean Food Information." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information, 47(1): 15-37. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.1.015
  5. Jung, Jun Soo. 2010. A Study on the Ways of Improving Classification System of Architectural Material: Based on the Practice of Architectural Firms. M. A. thesis., Sejong University, Korea.
  6. Kim, Hak Lae et al. 2004. "Building an Ontology based on the Unified Construction Information Classification System." The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 9(3): 95-112.
  7. Kim, Kyung Min. 2005. A Study on Facet Development of Structure for Legal Information: Focused on Precedents Related to Minor. M. A. thesis., Catholic University of Daegu, Korea.
  8. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology. 1996. The Establishment of Equivalence and Associative Relatioship for the retrieval of Construction Terms. Seoul: Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology.
  9. Lee, Jae-Yeol. 2000. "A Sutudy on the Conceptual Basis of the Construction Information Classification Systems: Focused on the facets of the Uniclass." Journal of the architectural institute of Korea. 145: 3-10.
  10. Lee, Seungmin. 2010. "Construction of the Concept-Based Faceted Framework for Thesaurus Integration." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(3): 269-290.
  11. Ministry of Construction & Transportation. 2006. "Standards for the Application to Construction Information Classification". Public Notification, No. 2006-281.
  12. Park, Heejin et al. 2015. "A Study on the Use of Facet Analysis for Ontology Modeling." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(2): 257-287. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.2.201506.257
  13. Shim, Jiyoung. "A Faceted Classification Analysis of TV content: Using News and Current Affairs Programs" The journal of the Korean society for information management, 31(3): 313-329. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.313
  14. Son, Dae-Hyung and Kim, Tae-Soo. 1998. "A Study on Thesaurus Construction Using Facet Classification." The journal of the Korean society for information management, 235-238.
  15. Yoo, Yeong-Jun. 2004. "A Study on Organizing the Web Using Facet Analysis." The Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 15(1): 23-41.
  16. Yoo, Yeong-Jun. 2008. "Establishing Facet for Classifying Theological Terms." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information, 42(3): 259-279. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.3.259
  17. Hunter, E. J. 2015. 분류란 무엇인가 : 지식의 구조화와 검색에 관한 이해. 박지영 옮김. 서울: 한울아카데미.
  18. Aitchison, Jean., A. Gilchrist and D. Bawden. 2000. Thesaurus construction and use: A practical manual. 4rd ed. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Pubsher.
  19. Campbell, D. J. 1963. "Making Your Own Indexing System in Science and Techonology." ASLIB Proceeding, 15(1963): 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb049939
  20. Hunter, E. J. 2015. Classification Made Simple. Park, Ziyoung Translator. Seoul: Hanul Academy.
  21. IFLA Working Group on the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records (FRAR). 2010. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data(FRSAD) A Conceptual Model. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions(IFLA).
  22. ISO 25964-1. 2011. Information and documentation- Thesauri and Interoperability with other vocabularies Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. Switzerland: ISO.
  23. ISO 25964-2. 2013. Information and documentation- Thesauri and Interoperability with other vocabularies Part: 2 Interoperability with other vocabularies. Switzerland: ISO.
  24. ISO 2788. 1986. Documentation- Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri. Switzerland: ISO
  25. Lancaster, F. W. 1972. Vocabulary Controlled Vocabulary for Information Retrieval. Washington, D.C.: Information Resource Press.
  26. Michael, J. Roberts. 1976. Construction Industry Thesaurus. 2nd ed., London: Department of the Environment, Property Services Agency.
  27. NISO. 2005. Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies. U.S.A: National Information Standards Organization.
  28. Ryan, Catherine. 2014. Thesaurus construction guidelines: An introduction to thesauri and guidelines on their construction. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy and National Library of Ireland.

피인용 문헌

  1. 신문기사정보 패싯 택소노미 구축 방안 - 예술 분야를중심으로 - vol.50, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.4.201912.381