Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain

Korean Academy of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine (대한안면통증구강내과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vocational Preference Inventory of Korean College Students with Symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorders

  • Received : 2017.02.13
  • Accepted : 2017.03.08
  • Published : 2017.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the association of vocational interest and personality with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: Four hundred and fourteen college students in Gyeonggi-do completed Vocational Preference Inventory L form and a questionnaire and collected data were analyzed by R program. Results: The percentage of subjects who responded that they had at least one contributing factor for TMD was significantly different among 27 two-letter Holland codes (p<0.05). The two-letter Holland codes of which the first-letter was social (S) (S artistic [A], S investigative [I], S realistic [R], S conventional [C], S enterprising [E]) or C (CE, CS, CA, CI) had tendency of having the relatively higher prevalence of symptoms and contributing factors for TMD. Among 6 one-letter Holland codes, the prevalence of a symptom of frequent fatigue in the jaw and a habit of gum chewing showed the significant difference (p<0.05). E code seemed to have lower prevalence of a symptom of frequent fatigue in the jaw than other codes. S code appeared to use chewing gum more frequently than other codes. High scorers on emotional instability showed the significantly higher prevalence of TMD symptoms (p<0.05) and contributing factors for TMD (p<0.001) than low scorers. Furthermore, high scorers on emotional instability had significantly higher mean scales of the number of positive answers of TMD symptoms (p<0.01) and of contributing factors for TMD (p<0.001) than low scorers. Conclusions: Symptoms and contributing factors for TMD were related to emotional instability. Vocational Preference Inventory L form might be utilized in assessing emotional factors of persons with TMD symptoms.

Keywords

References

  1. Bell WE. Temporomandibular disorders: classification, diagnosis, management. 3rd ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Pub.; 1990. pp. 166-176.
  2. Clark GT, Solberg WK. Perspectives in temporomandibular disorders. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1987. pp. 13.
  3. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Mosby; 2007. pp. 141-156.
  4. Kim YJ, Bazzy AR. Glycogen content in neonatal diaphragmatic fibers in response to inspiratory flow resistive loads. Pediatr Res 1992;31:354-358. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199204000-00010
  5. De Kanter RJ, Truin GJ, Burgersdijk RC, et al. Prevalence in the Dutch adult population and a meta-analysis of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder. J Dent Res 1993;72:1509-1518. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720110901
  6. Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L, Kruger A. An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints. Pain 1988;32:173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90066-8
  7. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, Von Korff MR. Diagnostic studies of temporomandibular disorders: challenges from an epidemiologic perspective. Anesth Prog 1990;37:147-154.
  8. Chun YM, Seo H. Analysis on constructing vocational preference inventory data from Work-Net DB. J Korea Data Anal Soc 2016;18:1377-1386.
  9. Holland JL. A personality inventory employing occupational titles. J Appl Psychol 1958;42:336-342. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047330
  10. Auh YK. A research report on revising vocational preference inventory. 1st ed. Eumseong: Korea Employment Information Service; 2008. pp. 4-39.
  11. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:81-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
  12. Nishiyama A, Kino K, Sugisaki M, Tsukagoshi K. A survey of influence of work environment on temporomandibular disordersrelated symptoms in Japan. Head Face Med 2012;8:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-24
  13. Perri R, Huta V, Pinchuk L, Pinchuk C, Ostry DJ, Lund JP. Initial investigation of the relation between extended computer use and temporomandibular joint disorders. J Can Dent Assoc 2008;74:643.
  14. Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Saez-Yuguero MR, Bermejo-Fenoll A. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder-related findings in violinists compared with control subjects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e15-e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.032
  15. Rugh JD, Solberg WK. Psychological implications in temporomandibular pain and dysfunction. Oral Sci Rev 1976;7:3-30.
  16. Kypp WL. Psychosomatic aspects of TMJ dysfuction. JADA 1959;59:31-44.
  17. Noh CS, Ko MY, Park JS. A psychological analysis of the orofacial pain patients through SCL-90-R. Korea J Oral Med 1999;24:467-477.
  18. Furnham A, Toop A, Lewis C, Fisher A. P-E fit and job satisfaction: a failure to support Holland's theory in three British samples. Personal Individ Differ 1995;19:677-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00091-J
  19. McNeill C. Temporomandibular disorders: guidelines for classification, assessment, and management. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1993. pp. 62.
  20. Nilner M. Prevalence of functional disturbances and diseases of the stomatognathic system in 15-18 year olds. Swed Dent J 1981;5:189-197.
  21. Lee SH. A cultural validity study on the Holland's theory in Korea [Master's thesis]. Seoul: Korea University; 2008.
  22. Holland JL. Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and work environments. 3rd ed. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1997.
  23. McDermott AN, Dell TF. Test review: vocational preference inventory. Rehabil Couns Bull 2014;57:182-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355213509856
  24. Smart JC, Thompson MD. The environmental identity scale and differentiation among environmental models in Holland's theory. J Vocat Behav 2001;58:436-452. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1760
  25. Kim JS, Kim YA, Heo JY, et al. Association between temporomandibular disorders and occupations by Korean Standard Classification of Occupations. J Oral Med Pain 2015;40:17-27. https://doi.org/10.14476/jomp.2015.40.1.17
  26. Sugisaki M, Takano N, Kino K, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders among working population of Tokyo. J Jpn Soc TMJ 2008;20:127-133.
  27. Park HS. Personality type test (MBTI) of Korean college students with symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Korean J Oral Med 2011;36:25-37.
  28. Manfredini D, Lobbezoo F. Relationship between bruxism and temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of literature from 1998 to 2008. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e26-e50.
  29. Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO-PI-R Professional manual. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1992.
  30. Gamsa A. Is emotional disturbance a precipitator or a consequence of chronic pain? Pain 1990;42:183-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(90)91161-B
  31. Parker MW, Holmes EK, Terezhalmy GT. Personality characteristics of patients with temporomandibular disorders: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:337-344.
  32. Hong SM, Kim BG, Kim JH. The relationship between the development of internal derangement of TMJ and occlusal and emotional factors. Korean J Oral Med 2003;28:239-247.
  33. Solberg WK, Flint RT, Brantner JP. Temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction: a clinical study of emotional and occlusal components. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:412-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90243-0
  34. Mongini F, Ciccone G, Ibertis F, Negro C. Personality characteristics and accompanying symptoms in temporomandibular joint dysfunction, headache, and facial pain. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:52-58.
  35. Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry 1976;128:280-289. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.128.3.280
  36. Hong KE, Jeong DU. Construction of Korean social readjustment rating scale: a methodological study. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1982;21:123-136.