DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Exceptional Cases to the Anti-Superiority Effect in Korean and Japanese: A Morpho-Syntactic Approach

  • Received : 2017.01.05
  • Accepted : 2017.01.27
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

In an English multiple Wh-construction with two wh-words, only a higher-located wh-word in a sentence structure is allowed to pre-pose to the Spec of CP, which has been known as a Superiority Effect(SE). Contrary to English, Korean and Japanese have been known not to respect SE, and this phenomenon has been called an Anti-Superiority Effect(ASE). Recent studies including Takita et al(2007) and Harada(2015) among others, however, have suggested exceptional cases to ASE in Japanese, and attempted to explain them through a feature checking mechanism within the Minimalist Program(MP) by Chomsky(1995, 1998). Such explanations of MP, which are based on the abstract feature checking system, have recently been considered just as a kind of technicalia and should be backed up with further empirical evidence. In this paper, I show that there are also exceptions to ASE in Korean, and the exceptional cases to ASE both in Korean and Japanese can be well explainable based on the empirical evidence of Korean/Japanese morpho-syntax.

Keywords

References

  1. Chomsky, N., Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995
  2. Han-gyoo Khym, "Variation of Cannonical Sentential Structure in Korean and Japanese Dialects and Its Implication" ,IJIBC Vol. 7, No. 2, 2015
  3. Harada, Masashi, "Reanalysis of the Anti-Superiority Effect", KWPL Vol. 36, pp. 59-69, 2015
  4. Saito, Mamoru, "Some Remarks on Superiority and Crossing", In Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective, ed. By Hang-Jin Yoon, Hankook, Seoul, pp.571-595, 2004
  5. Takita, Kensuke, Fuji Chisato, and Barry C-Y, Yang, "Wh-Questions in Chinese and Japanese I: Anti-Crossing and Anti-Superiority", In Nanzan Linguistics: Special Issue 1, Vol. 2, pp. 99-112, 2007
  6. Watanabe, Akira, "Subjacency and S-Structure Movement of Wh-in-Situ", In Journal of East Asian Linguistics. Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.225-291, 1992