Industrial Engineering and Management Systems

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Standstill Conditions in Kaizen Activity: Through Case Studies of Two Companies in their Long-Term Efforts

  • Yamaguchi, Jun (Department of Computer Science, Tokyo University of Technology) ;
  • Kono, Hirokazu (Graduate School of Business Administration, Keio University)
  • Received : 2016.03.30
  • Accepted : 2016.11.22
  • Published : 2017.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Multiple prior studies stress that continued Kaizen activity is conducive to building and maintaining competitive advantages of manufacturing companies. Meanwhile, it remains unclear as to what kind of management factors may exert impact on sustainment of Kaizen activity. This paper discusses a study conducted on the cases of two manufacturing lines, where such activity has been continued for more than ten years. At first, it was discovered that study period was divided into different periods. It was also found out that 'standstill conditions' which prevent smooth progress of activity exist in many periods, and that such conditions are hard to avoid. The study went on to categorize progress of activity in each period into different patterns, including at which points standstill conditions occurred, thereby, circumstances of standstill conditions were made clear. This paper verified a detailed process of Kaizen activity development in each period and the relationship between that detailed process and points of occurrence of standstill conditions. Thought was also given to factors and actions for smooth development, and effects brought about by overcoming such challenges. Lastly, consideration was given to the future perspectives of the study for elucidating how better Kaizen activity may be managed for continuation.

Keywords

References

  1. Bhuiyan, N. and Baghel, A. (2005), An overview of continuous improvement: From the past to the present, Management Decision, 43(5), 761-771. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510597761
  2. Boer, H., Berger, A., Chapman, R., and Gertsen, F. (eds) (2000), CI Changes. From Suggestion Box to Organisational Learning, Ashgate, Aldershot.
  3. Kojo, Kanri ('Factory Management' October edition) (2005), 'Special Feature - Going beyond Boundaries of Small Group Activity! - Three Abilities for Making Improvement Part of Corporate Culture'; 'Case Report - Continuing improvement steadily by small groups and aiming to make improvement part of corporate culture - Owari Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (Published in Japanese).
  4. Kono, H. (1998a), Fuchu Plant, Toshiba Corporation (A), Keio Business School Case (Published in Japanese).
  5. Kono, H. (1998b), Fuchu Plant, Toshiba Corporation (B), Keio Business School Case (Published in Japanese).
  6. Takahara, A. (2009), 'Special program: 8 secrets for overcoming standstill in kaizen activity and making the activity take root' - general remarks: What effort does it take for having kaizen activity be firmly established, Kojo Kanri, 55(5), 60-63 (Published in Japanese).
  7. Upton, D. M. and McAfee, A. P. (2000), A path-based approach to information technology in manufacturing, International Journal of Technology Management, 20(3/4), 354. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2000.002876
  8. Yamaguchi, J. (2015), A Research on Accumulating and Utilizing Information Related to Kaizen for Sustaining Kaizen Activitities, Doctoral dissertation, Keio Business School (Available in Japanese).

Cited by

  1. Kaizen implementation context and performance vol.10, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5937/jemc2001031s