DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of genetic diversity of Prangos fedtschenkoi (Apiaceae) and its conservation status based on ISSR markers

  • Mustafina, Feruza U. (Korea National Arboretum (KNA)) ;
  • Kim, Eun Hye (Korea National Arboretum (KNA)) ;
  • Son, Sung-Won (Korea National Arboretum (KNA)) ;
  • Turginov, Orzimat T. (Institute of Gene Pool of Plants and Animals of Uzbek Academy of Sciences (IGPA UzSc)) ;
  • Chang, Kae Sun (Korea National Arboretum (KNA)) ;
  • Choi, Kyung (Korea National Arboretum (KNA))
  • 투고 : 2017.01.08
  • 심사 : 2017.03.03
  • 발행 : 2017.03.31

초록

Prangos fedtschenkoi (Regel et Schmalh.) Korovin (Apiaceae) is an endemic species for mountainous Middle Asia, which is both a rare and useful plant. Organic extractions from this species are being used in pharmaceutics and cosmetology. In recent years, P. fedtschenkoi distribution area has considerably decreased, presumably, resulting from human activities such as agriculture, construction works, overgrazing and collection from wild for pharmaceutic purposes. Six populations were found in Uzbekistan and their genetic divergence and differentiation were studied with 10 inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers, selected out of 101. Totally 166 amplified ISSR fragments (loci) were revealed, of which 164 were polymorphic. Relatively moderate level of polymorphism was found at population level with polymorphic bands ranging from 27.71% to 47.59%. Mean P = 39.05%, $N_a=1.40$, $N_e=1.25$, S.I. = 0.21, and $H_e=0.14$ were revealed for all loci across six populations. AMOVA showed higher variation among populations (62%) than within them (38%). The Bayesian model determined 5 clusters, or genetic groups. The posteriori distribution of the Theta II estimator detected full model identifying high inbreeding, intensified by low gene flow (Nm = 0.3954). Mantel test confined population 6 as distinct cluster corresponding to geographic remoteness (R = 0.5137, $p{\leq}0.005$). Results were used as the bases for developing conserve measures to restore populations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adeel, Z., U. Safriel, D. Niemeijer, R. White, G. de Kalbermatten, M. Glantz, B. Salem, B. Scholes, M. Niamir-Fuller, S. Ehui and V. Yapi-Gnaore. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Desertification Synthesis. A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. World Resources Institute. Island Press, Washington, DC, 36 pp.
  2. Barrett, S. C. H. and B. C. Husband. 1990. The genetics of plant migration and colonization. In Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Brown, A. H. D., M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler and B. S. Weir (eds.), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Pp. 254-277.
  3. Brussard, P. F. 1984. Geographic patterns and environmental gradients: the central-marginal model in Drosophila revisited. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 25-64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.000325
  4. Central Asian Countries Initiative for Land Management (CACILM) Multicountry Partnership Framework Support Project. Retrieved on January, 2017, from https://www.adb.org/projects.
  5. Davis, P. H., R. R. Mill and K. Tan. 1988. Prangos Lindl. In Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Suppl. 1). Vol. 10. Davis, P. H., R. R. Mill and K. Tan (eds.), Edinburg University Press, Edinburg. Pp. 151.
  6. Duman, H. 2000. Prangos Lindl. In Flora of Turkey and the East Eagean Islands (Suppl. 2), Vol. 11. Gunder, A., N. Ozhatay, T. Ekim and K. H. C. Baser (eds.), Edinburg University Press, Edinburg. Pp. 141-142.
  7. Duman, H. and M. F. Watson. 1999. Ekimia, a new genus of Umbelliferae, and two new taxa of Prangos Lindl. (Umbelliferae) from southern Turkey. Edinburg Journal of Botany 56: 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428600001086
  8. Duran, A., M. Sagiroglu and H. Duman. 2005. Prangos turcica (Apiaceae), a new species from South Anatolia, Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici 42: 67-72.
  9. Earl, D. A. and B. M. vonHoldt. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
  10. Etterson, J. R. and R. G. Shaw. 2001. Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294: 151-154. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063656
  11. Evanno, G. S. Regnuat and J. Goudet. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611-2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
  12. Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse and J. M. Quattro. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction sites. Genetics 131: 479-491.
  13. FAO, 2011. FAO Statistics Division. Retrieved on December, 2016, from http://faostat.fao.org.
  14. GeoCat B.V. 2015. GeoCat Bridge 2.0: Extension for Esri ArcGIS Desktop. GeoCat B.V., Bennekom.
  15. Hampe, A. and R. J. Petit. 2005. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecology Letters 8: 461-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x
  16. Hamrick, J. L. and M. J. W. Godt. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Brown A. H. D., M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler and B. S. Weir (eds.), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Pp. 43-63.
  17. Herrnstadt, I. and C. C. Heyn. 1977. A monographic study of the genus Prangos (Umbelliferae). Biossiera 26: 1-91.
  18. Herrnstadt, I. and C. C. Heyn. 1987. Prangos Lindl. In Flora Iranica 162. Rechinger, H. K. (ed.), Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz. Pp. 190-206.
  19. Holsinger, K. E. and P. O. Lewis. 2003. HICKORY: a package for analysis of population genetic data. V1.0. Retrieved on May, 2016, from http://www.eeb.uconn.edu.
  20. Holsinger, K. E., P. O. Lewis and D. K. Dey. 2002. A Bayesian approach to inferring population structure with dominant markers. Molecular Ecology 11: 1157-1164. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01512.x
  21. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN). 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. 2nd ed. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge, 32 pp.
  22. Kimura, M. and J. F. Crow. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49: 725-738.
  23. Kljuykov, E. and U. Ukrainskaja. 2010. Distribution of the Umbelliferae in Middle Asia and Kazakhstan. Plant Diversity and Evolution 128: 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0027
  24. Kuzmina, L. V. 1963. Central Asian species of Prangos Lindl. genera as the source of phytocoumarins. In Plants-the sources of biological active compounds with therapeutic effect. M-L.: Nazchsa: 5-27. (in Russian)
  25. Kuznetsova, G. A. and L. M. Belenovskaya. 1969. Additional information on the coumarin composition of Prangos fedtschenkoi (Regel et Schmalh.) Korob., Prangos tschimganica Bergapten Fedtschenkoi, and Prangos isphairamica Bergapten Fedtschenkoi. (Umbelliferae). Journal of Applied Chemistry of the USSR 42: 471.
  26. Lawton, J. H. 1993. Range, population abundance and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 409-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90043-O
  27. Lenormand, T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02497-7
  28. Lewontin, R. C. 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. In Evolutionary Biology. Vol. 6. Dobzhansky, T., M. K. Hecht and W. C. Steere (eds.), Springer, New York. Pp. 381-398.
  29. Limin, H. Engaging with land users: the first steps on a long road. 2012. In Rangeland Stewardship in Central Asia: Balancing Improved Livelihoods, Biodiversity Conservation and Land Protection. Squires, V. R. (ed.), Springer, Dordrecht. Pp. 333-356.
  30. Lopez-Pujol, J., M. C. Martinell, S. Masso, C. Blanche and L. Saez. 2013. The ‘paradigm of extremes’: extremely low genetic diversity in an extremely narrow endemic species, Coristospermum huteri (Umbelliferae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 299: 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0732-3
  31. Lyskov D. F. 2015. The systematics of the genera Prangos (Umbelliferae, Apioideae) and allied taxa: comparing of morpho-anatomical and molecular data. Ph.D. thesis. 217 pp. (in Russian)
  32. McDermott, J. M. and B. A. McDonald. 1993. Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31: 353-373. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.002033
  33. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist 106: 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1086/282771
  34. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 70: 3321-3323. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321
  35. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 637-669. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
  36. Peakall, R. and P. E. Smouse. 2012. GenAlEx 6.2: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research: an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537-2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
  37. Pimenov, M. G. and V. N. Tikhomirov. 1983. The taxonomic problems in the genera Prangos Lindl., Cachrys L., Cryptodiscus Schrenk and Hippomarathrum Hoffmgg. et Link (Umbelliferae: Apioideae). Feddes Repertorium 94: 145-164.
  38. Pimenov, M. G. and M. V. Leonov. 1993. The Genera of Umbelliferae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 164 pp.
  39. Pimenov, M. G., E. Akalin and E. Kljuykov. 2005. Prangos ilanae (Umbelliferae), a new species from Western Turkey. Candollea 60: 379-385.
  40. Post, G. E. 1932. Flora of Syria, Palestine and Sinai. American Press, Beirut. Pp. 538-539.
  41. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
  42. Qiu, Y.-X., D.-Y. Hong, C.-X. Fu and K. M. Cameron. 2004. Genetic variation in the endangered and endemic species Changium smyrnioides (Apiaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32: 583-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2003.08.004
  43. Rosenberg, N. A., T. Burke, K. Elo, M. W. Feldman, P. J. Freidlin, M. A. Groenen, J. Hillel, A. Maki-Tanila, M. Tixier-Boichard, A. Vignal, K. Wimmers and S. Weigend. 2001. Empirical evaluation of genetic clustering methods using multilocus genotypes from 20 chicken breeds. Genetics 159: 699-713.
  44. Senol, S. G., H. Yildirim and O. Secmen. 2011. Prangos hulusii sp. nov. (Apiaceae) from West Anatolia, Turkey. Nordic Journal of Botany 29: 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2011.01097.x
  45. Shishkin, B. K. 1950. Prangos Lindl. In Flora of the USSR. Vol. 16.Shishkin B. K. (ed.), AN SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad. Pp. 263-273
  46. Spiegelhalter, D. J., N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin and A. van der Linde. 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64: 583-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353
  47. State Committee of RUz on Statistics. Retrieved on December, 000, from http://www.stat.uz.
  48. Tutin, T. G. 1968. Cachrys L. In Flora Europaea. Vol. 2.Tutin T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A. Webb (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pp. 34-344.
  49. Vucetich, J. A. and T. A. Waite. 2003. Spatial patters of demography and genetic processes across the species’ range: null hypotheses for landscape conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 4: 639-645. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025671831349
  50. Yeh, F. C. and T. J. B. Boyle, 1997. Popgene. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belgian Journal of Botany 129: 157.
  51. Zakirov, K. Z. 1961. The flora and vegetation of the Zeravshan-River Basin. Part 2. Conspectus of the flora. Akademii Nauk Uzbekskoi SSR, Tashkent. Pp. 1, 2.
  52. Zietkiewicz, E., A. Rafalski and D. Labuda. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176-183. https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1151

피인용 문헌

  1. A comparative morphological study of Thymelaeaceae in Korea vol.47, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2017.47.3.207
  2. (Apiaceae) vol.9, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4753