DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical study of ship motions and added resistance in regular incident waves of KVLCC2 model

  • Received : 2016.06.20
  • Accepted : 2016.09.04
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

In this study, the numerical investigation of ship motions and added resistance at constant forward velocity of KVLCC2 model is presented. Finite volume CFD code is used to calculate three dimensional, incompressible, unsteady RANS equations. Numerical computations show that reliable numerical results can be obtained in head waves. In the numerical analyses, body attached mesh method is used to simulate the ship motions. Free surface is simulated by using VOF method. The relationship between the turbulence viscosity and the velocities are obtained through the standard ${\kappa}-{\varepsilon}$ turbulence model. The numerical results are examined in terms of ship resistance, ship motions and added resistance. The validation studies are carried out by comparing the present results obtained for the KVLCC2 hull from the literature. It is shown that, ship resistance, pitch and heave motions in regular head waves can be estimated accurately, although, added resistance can be predicted with some error.

Keywords

References

  1. Arribas, F.P., 2007. Some methods to obtain the added resistance of a ship advancing in waves. Ocean. Eng. 34 (7), 946-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.06.002
  2. Chau, S.-W., Kouh, J.-S., Wong, T.-H., Chen, Y.-J., 2005. Investigation of hydrodynamic performance of high-speed craft rudders via turbulent flow computations, part i: non-cavitating characteristics. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 13 (1), 61-72.
  3. Deng, G.B., Queutey, M., Visonneau, M., 2010. RANS prediction of the KVLCC2 tanker in head waves. J. Hydrodyn. 22 (5), 476-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60239-0
  4. Faltinsen, O.M., Minsaas, K.J., Liapis, N., Skjordal, S., 1980. Prediction of resistance and propulsion of a ship in a seaway. In: Proceedings of the 13th ONR Symposium.
  5. Fang, M.C., 1998. A simplified method to predict the added resistance of a SWATH ship in waves. J. Ship Res. 42 (2), 131-138.
  6. Guo, B.J., Steen, S., Deng, G.B., 2012. Seakeeping prediction of KVLCC2 in head waves with RANS. Appl. Ocean Res. 35, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2011.12.003
  7. Guo, B.J., Steen, S., 2011. Evaluation of added resistance of KVLCC2 in short waves. J. Hydrodyn. 23 (6), 709-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60168-0
  8. G2010, 2010. A Workshop on CFD in ShipHydrodynamics (Gothenburg, Sweden).
  9. Irvine, M., Longo, J., Stern, F., 2008. Pitch and heave tests and uncertainty assessment for a surface combatant in regular head waves. J. Ship Res. 52(2), 146-163.
  10. Leroyer, A., Wackers, J., Queutey, P., Guilmineau, E., 2011. Numerical strategies to speed up CFD computations with free surface e application to the dynamic equilibrium of hulls. Ocean Eng. 38 (17-18), 2070-2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.09.006
  11. Liu, S., Papanikolaou, A., Zaraphonitis, G., 2011. Prediction of added resistance of ships in waves. Ocean Eng. 38 (4), 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.12.007
  12. Liu, T.-L., Pan, K.-C., 2014. The numerical study of the dynamic behavior of an underwater vehicle. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 22 (2), 163-172.
  13. Masashi, K., 2013. Hydrodynamic study on added resistance using unsteady wave analysis. J. Ship Res. 57 (4), 220-240. https://doi.org/10.5957/JOSR.57.4.130036
  14. Matulja, D.J., Sportelli, M., Guedes Soares, C., Prpic-Orsic, J., 2011. Estimation of added resistance of a ship in regular waves. Brodogradnja J. Nav. Archit. Shipbuild. Ind. 62 (3), 259-264.
  15. Orihara, H., Miyata, H., 2003. Evaluation of added resistance in regular incident waves by computational fluid dynamics motion simulation using an overlapping grid system. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 8 (2), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-003-0163-5
  16. Ozdemir, Y.H., Barlas, B., Yilmaz, T., Bayraktar, S., 2014. Numerical and experimental study of turbulent free surface flow for a fast ship model. Brodogradnja J. Nav. Archit. Shipbuild. Ind. 65 (1), 39-54.
  17. Panahani, R., Jahanbakhsh, E., Seif, M.S., 2009. Towards simulation of 3D nonlinear high-speed vessels motion. Ocean Eng. 36, 256-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.11.005
  18. Patankar, S.V., Spalding, D.B., 2005. A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 15 (2), 1787-1806.
  19. Sadat-Hosseini, H., Wu, P.C., Carrica, P.M., 2013. CFD verification and validation of added resistance and motions of KVLCC2 with fixed and free surge in short and long head waves. Ocean Eng. 59, 240-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.016
  20. Salvesen, N., Tuck, E.O., Faltinsen, O.M., 1970. Ship Motion and Sea Loads. SNAME.
  21. Salvesen, N., 1978. Added resistance of ships in waves. J. Ship Hydronaut. 12(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.63110
  22. Sato, Y., Miyata, H., Sato, T., 1999. CFD simulation of 3-dimensional motion of a ship in waves application to an advanced ship in regular heading waves. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 4 (9), 108-116.
  23. Seo, K.C., Atlar, M., Sampson, R., 2012. Hydrodynamic development of inclined keel hull-resistance. Ocean Eng. 47, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.03.008
  24. Seo, M.G., Park, D.M., Yang, K.K., 2013. Comparative study on computation of ship added resistance in waves. Ocean Eng. 73, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.07.008
  25. Wilson, R.V., Carrica, P.M., Stern, F., 2006. Unsteady RANS method of ship motions with application to roll for a surface combatant. Comput. Fluids 35, 501-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2004.12.005
  26. Zhirong, S., Decheng, W., 2013. RANS computations of added resistance and motions of a ship in head waves. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 23 (4), 263-271.

Cited by

  1. Investigation on the performance of the traditional Indonesian fishing vessel vol.159, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815902056
  2. A new URANS based approach on the prediction of vertical motions of a surface combatant in head waves vol.162, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.020
  3. Influence of the Symmetry Plane Boundary Condition on the Planing Multihull Calm Water Resistance Test. CFD to Towing Tank Comparison vol.1, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2478/ntpe-2018-0048
  4. Preliminary Study on the Contribution of External Forces to Ship Behavior vol.7, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7030072
  5. Resistance performance simulation of remotely operated vehicle in deep sea considering propeller rotation vol.234, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090219867604
  6. Neural Network Approach for Predicting Ship Speed and Fuel Consumption vol.9, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9020119
  7. Numerical Simulation of the Motion of a Large Scale Unmanned Surface Vessel in High Sea State Waves vol.9, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9090982
  8. Influence of Flanks on Resistance Performance of High-Speed Amphibious Vehicle vol.9, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9111260