한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)

  • 제24권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-8
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-8962(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-982X(eISSN)
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기능적 발목 불안정성을 가진 대상자에게 동적 자세 안정성 훈련과 연성 발목 보조기가 다중 한발 뛰기 수행에 미치는 효과 비교

Comparison of the Effects of Dynamic Postural Stability Training Versus Soft Ankle Bracing on Multiple Hop Performance in Participants With Functional Ankle Instability

  • 차윤상 (전주대학교 의과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 박규남 (전주대학교 의과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Cha, Youn-sang (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University) ;
  • Park, Kyue-nam (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.22
  • 심사 : 2017.01.10
  • 발행 : 2017.02.19
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: The multiple hop test is an active performance test that has been commonly used to assess individuals with functional ankle instability. Previous studies have suggested that insufficiency of dynamic postural stability and passive stability during dynamic activities can have an influence on performance in the multiple hop test. However, no study has investigated the effects of dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing on multiple hop test performance in individuals with functional ankle instability. Objects: The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of dynamic postural stability training versus ankle bracing in the performance of the multiple hop test for participants with functional ankle instability. Methods: Twenty-nine participants with functional ankle instability who scored below 24 in the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool were selected. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: a dynamic postural stability training group (n1=14) and an ankle bracing control group ($n_2=15$). The multiple hop tests were performed before and after applying each intervention. Dynamic postural stability training was performed using visual-feedback-based balance-training equipment; participants in this group were asked to perform a heel raise in a standing position while watching the centering of their forefoot pressure to prevent excessive ankle inversion. Ankle bracing was applied in the control group. Results: When comparing the pre- and post-intervention period for both groups, both methods significantly improved the results of the multiple hop test (p<.05). However, no significant differences were shown between the dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing groups (p>.05). Conclusion: Both dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing showed significant improvement (2.85 seconds and 2.05 seconds, respectively) in test performance. Further study is needed to determine the long-term effects of dynamic postural stability training and to determine whether insufficient dynamic postural stability is a causative factor for functional ankle instability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. DiStefano LJ, Padua DA, Brown CN, et al. Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces after prophylactic lace-up ankle bracing. J Athl Train. 2008;43(3):234-241. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-43.3.234
  2. Docherty CL, Arnold BL, Gansneder BM, et al. Functional-Performance deficits in volunteers with functional ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2005;40(1):30-34.
  3. Docherty CL, Moore JH, Arnold BL. Effects of strength training on strength development and joint position sense in functionally unstable ankles. J Athl Train. 1998;33(4):310-314.
  4. Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, et al. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014;44(1):123-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5
  5. Donovan L, Hart JM, Saliba SA et al. Rehabilitation for Chronic Ankle Instability With or Without Destabilization Devices: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Athl Train. 2016;51(3):233-251. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-51.3.09
  6. Eechaute C, Vaes P, Duquet W. Functional performance deficits in patients with CAI: Validity of the multiple hop test. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18(2):124-129. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e31816148d2
  7. Fitzgerald D, Trakarnratanakul N, Smyth B, et al. Effects of a wobble board-based therapeutic exergaming system for balance training on dynamic postural stability and intrinsic motivation levels. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(1):11-19. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3121
  8. Gauffin H, Tropp H, Odenrick P. Effect of ankle disk training on postural contril in patients with functional instabilities of the ankle joint. Int J Sports Med. 1988;9(2):141-144.
  9. Greene TA, Hillman SK. Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during, and after exercise. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(5):498-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659001800509
  10. Gross MT, Liu HY. The role of ankle bracing for prevention of ankle sprain injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(10):572-577. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2003.33.10.572
  11. Hall EA, Docherty CL, Simon J, et al. Strength-training protocols to improve deficits in participants with chronic ankle instability: A randomized controlled trial. J Athl Train. 2015;50(1):36-44. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.71
  12. Hertel J. Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain. Sports Med. 2000;29(5):361-371. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200029050-00005
  13. Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, et al. The cumberland ankle instability tool: A report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(9):1235-1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022
  14. Kosik KB, McCann RS, Terada M, et al. Therapeutic interventions for improving self-reported function in patients with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(2):105-112. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096534
  15. Mattacola CG, Dwyer MK. Rehabilitation of the Ankle After Acute Sprain or Chronic Instability. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):413-429.
  16. Moore S, Woollacott MH. The use of biofeedback devices to improve postural stability. Phys Ther Practice. 1993;2(2):1-19.
  17. Nyska M, Shabat S, Simkin A, et al. Dynamic force distribution during level walking under the feet of patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(6):495-497. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.6.495
  18. Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The sensorimotor system, part I: The physiologic basis of functional joint stability. J Athl Train. 2002;37(1):71-79.
  19. Richie DH Jr. Functional instability of the ankle and the role of neuromuscular control: A comprehensive review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2001;40(4):240-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516(01)80025-9
  20. Ross SE, Guskiewicz KM. Examination of static and dynamic postural stability in individuals with functionally stable and unstable ankles. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14(6):332-338. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-200411000-00002
  21. Sekir U, Yildiz Y, Hazneci B, et al. Reliability of a functional test battery evaluating functionality, proprioception, and strength in recreational athletes with functional ankle instability. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(4):407-415.
  22. Wikstrom EA, Hubbard-Turner T, McKeon PO. Understanding and treating lateral ankle sprains and their consequences: A constraints-based approach. Sports Med. 2013;43(6):385-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0043-z
  23. Wright CJ, Linens SW, Cain MS. A randomized controlled trial comparing rehabilitation efficacy in chronic ankle instability. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;24:1-32.

피인용 문헌

  1. 테이핑의 종류가 만성 발목 불안정성을 가진 성인의 정적 및 동적 균형에 미치는 효과 비교 vol.8, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2020.8.1.027