DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

User Needs-Based Technology Opportunities in Heterogeneous Fields Using Opinion Mining and Patent Analysis

오피니언 마이닝 및 특허분석을 통한 사용자 니즈기반 이종영역 기술기회 탐색

  • Jang, Hyejin (Department of Industrial and System Engineering, Dongguk University) ;
  • Roh, Taeyeoun (Department of Industrial and System Engineering, Dongguk University) ;
  • Yoon, Byungun (Department of Industrial and System Engineering, Dongguk University)
  • 장혜진 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과) ;
  • 노태연 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과) ;
  • 윤병운 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2016.09.17
  • Accepted : 2017.01.20
  • Published : 2017.02.15

Abstract

In a digital economy, users actively express their needs in many ways. Thus, many researchers analyze what users need and whether they are satisfied or not through opinion mining. In addition, they begin to find technology opportunities in heterogeneous technology fields. But they did not connect users' opinion to technology development process, only focused on natural language processing or marketing or manufacturing area. Also, heterogeneous technology fields are focused on fusion technology. Thus, this study suggests a novel approach that is based on sentimental value and can be applied to exploring technology opportunities in heterogeneous fields. Sentimental value is calculated from users' opinion through sLDA. The heterogeneous technology opportunity is explored by patent analysis. This research contributes to suggesting a hybrid methodology through patent and users' opinion. In addition, it can provide managerial efficiency by suggesting base data onto decision making.

Keywords

References

  1. An, J., Kim, K., Noh, H., and Lee, S. (2016), Identifying Converging Technologies in the ICT Industry : Analysis of Patents Published by Incumbents and Entrants, Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 42(3), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.3.209
  2. Bin, H., Lucheng, H., Feifei, W., and Hong, M. (2015), Assessment of the Connectivity between Technologies Based on Patent Co-classification, Beijing, China.
  3. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., and Jordan M. I. (2003), Latent dirichlet allocation, Journal of machine Learning research, 3, 993-1022.
  4. Choi, C., Kim, S., and Park, Y. (2007), A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technological impact : The case of information and communication technology, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1296-1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.10.008
  5. Ghazizadeh, M., McDonald, A. D., and Lee. J. D. (2014), Text mining to decipher free-response consumer complaints insights from the NHTSA vehicle owner's complaint database, Human Factors : The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(6), 1189-1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813519473
  6. Ghiassi, M., Skinner, J., and Zimbra, D. (2013), Twitter brand sentiment analysis : A hybrid system using n-gram analysis and dynamic artificial neural network, Expert Systems with Applications, 40(16), 6266-6282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.057
  7. Griffiths, T. L. and Steyvers, M. (2004), Finding scientific topics, Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228-5235.
  8. Huang, L., Shang, L., Wang, K., Porter, A. L., and Zhang, Y. (2015), Identifying target for technology mergers and acquisitions using patent information and semantic analysis, 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).
  9. Jeong, E. S., Kim, Y. G., Lee, S. C., Kim, Y. T., and Cxhang, Y. B. (2014), Identifying Emerging Free Technologies by PCT Patent Analysis, The Journal of the Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 9(1), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2014.9.1.111
  10. Jin, S. A., Heo, G. E., Jeong, Y. K., and Song, M. (2013), Topic-Network based Topic Shift Detection on Twitter, Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.285
  11. Jo, C. Y., Lee, Y. M., Sin, H. J., and Park, H. J. (2005), Validation of claim as patent analysis indicator, Patent 21, 64, 14-21.
  12. Jeong, B. and Lee, H. (2016), Research Topics in Industrial Engineering 2001-2015, Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 42(6), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.6.421
  13. Kim, M., Park, Y., and Yoon, J. (2016), Generating patent development maps for technology monitoring using semantic patent-topic analysis, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 98, 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.006
  14. Kim, J. and Lee, S. (2016), Issues for Technology-Humanities Convertgence : Patent Keyword Analysis, Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 42(3), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.3.231
  15. KISTI (2012), Design and construction of a knowledge base for technology opportunity discovery, Daejun.
  16. Ko, N., Yoon, J., and Seo, W. (2014), Analyzing interdisciplinarity of technology fusion using knowledge flows of patents, Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1955-1963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.091
  17. Kwon, J.-D. (2012), An actual proof study on selecting key patents based on patent index, Hansung University, Seoul, Korea.
  18. Lee, C., Kang, B., and Shin, J. (2015), Novelty-focused patent mapping for technology opportunity analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90(B), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.010
  19. Lee, H.-J. (2005), Analysis of science and technology information necessary for research and development (R&D), Patent 21, 60, 33-39.
  20. Lee, T. Y. (2009), Automatically learning user needs from online reviews for new product design, AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 22.
  21. Lee, T. Y., Li, S., and Wei, R. (2008), Needs-centric searching and ranking based on customer reviews, 2008 10th IEEE Conference on ECommerce Technology and the Fifth IEEE Conference on Enterprise Computing.
  22. Lee, W. S. and Sohn, S. Y. (2015), Topic model analysis of research trend on spatial big data, Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 41(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2015.41.1.064
  23. Lim, C., Yun, D., Park, I., Park, G., Koh, S., and Yoon, B. (2015), Exploring Prospective Research Areas in UI/UX through the Analysis of Patents, Korean Management Science Review, 32(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2015.32.4.001
  24. Liu, B. (2012), Sentiment analysis and opinion mining, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 5(1), 1-167. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016
  25. Liu, Y., Huang, X., An, A., and Yu, X. (2008), Modeling and predicting the helpfulness of online reviews, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.
  26. Liu, Y., Jin, J., Ji, P., Harding, J. A., and Fung, R. Y. (2013), Identifying helpful online reviews : a product designer's perspective, Computer-Aided Design, 45(2), 180-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.07.008
  27. Mcauliffe, J. D. and Blei, D. M. (2008), Supervised topic models, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 121-128.
  28. Min, H.-J. and Park, J. C. (2012), Identifying helpful reviews based on customer's mentions about experiences, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(15), 11830-11838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.116
  29. No, H. J., An, Y., and Park, Y. (2015), A structured approach to explore knowledge flows through technology-based business methods by integrating patent citation analysis and text mining, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 97, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.007
  30. No, H. J. and Park, Y. (2010), Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: Trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.006
  31. Paradigms, T. and Trajectories, T. (1982), A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change, Research Policy, 11, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
  32. Park, J. and Song, M. (2013), A study on the Research Trends in Library and Information Science in Korea using Topic Modeling, Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007
  33. Penalver-Martinez, I., Garcia-Sanchez, F., Rodriguez-Garcia, M. A., Moreano, V., Fraga, A., and Sanchez-Cervantes, J. L. (2014), Featurebased opinion mining through ontologies, Expert Systems with Applications, 41(13), 5995-6008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.022
  34. Singh, V. K., Piryani, R., Udding, A., and Waila, P. (2013), Sentiment analysis of movie reviews : A new feature-based heuristic for aspect-level sentiment classification, Automation, Computing, Communication, Control and Compressed Sensing (iMac4s).
  35. Thorleuchter, D., Poel, D. V., and Prinzie, A. (2012), Analyzing existing customers' websites to improve the customer acquisition process as well as the profitability prediction in B-to-B marketing, Expert systems with applications, 39(3), 2597-2605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.115
  36. Wu, M., Wang, L., Li, M., and Long, H. (2014), An approach of product usability evaluation based on Web mining in feature fatigue analysis, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 75, 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.001
  37. Yun, J.-H. (2011), Patent Information Analysis : Tools for Systematic R&D Planning, Industrial Engineering Magazine, 18(3), 23-28.

Cited by

  1. Developing a Methodology of Structuring and Layering Technological Information in Patent Documents through Natural Language Processing vol.9, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112117