DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Operator Capacity Assessment Method for the Supervisory Control of Unmanned Military Vehicle

군사로봇의 감시제어에서 운용자 역량 평가 방법에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Sang-Yeong (The Specialized Research Center for Future Ground System Analysis, MyongJi University) ;
  • Yang, Ji-Hyeon (Automotive Engineering,Kookmin University)
  • Received : 2016.12.19
  • Accepted : 2017.02.15
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

Unmanned military vehicles (UMVs) will be increasingly applied to the various military operations. These UMVs are most commonly characterized as dealing with "4D" task - dull, dirty, dangerous and difficult with automations. Although most of the UMVs are designed to a high degree of autonomy, the human operator will still intervene in the robots operation, and tele-operate them to achieve his or her mission. Thus, operator capacity, along with robot autonomy and user interface, is one of the important design factors in the research and development of the UMVs. In this paper, we propose the method to assess the operator capacity of the UMVs. The method is comprised of the 6 steps (problem, assumption, goal function identification, operator task analysis, task modeling & simulation, results and assessment), and herein colored Petri-nets are used for the modeling and simulation. Further, an illustrative example is described at the end of this paper.

Keywords

References

  1. R.O. Gorman, C. Abbott, Remote control war, 2013.
  2. J.Y. Chen, M.J. Barnes, and M. Harper-Sciarini, "Supervisory control of multiple robots: Human performance issues and user-interface design," Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 41 no. 4, pp. 435-454, 2011.
  3. B.M. Jordan et al. "Human-Robot Interaction Literature Review," DRDC No. CR-2012-083, Department of National Defense, Canada, 2012.
  4. D. R. O. Jr., "Stephen Bart Wood. Fan-out: Measuring Human Control of Multiple Robots," CHI 2004, April, Vienna, Austria, 2004, pp. 24-29.
  5. B. Michael and J. Florian, "Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations," MPG Books Group, UK. 2010.
  6. K.C. Hendy and P.S. Farrell, "Implementing a Model of Human Information Processing in a Task Network Simulation Environment," Canadian Department of National Defense, Defense and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine Technical Report DCIEM No.97-R-71, North York, Ontario, Canada M3M 3B9, 1997.
  7. R. Parasurman et al. "A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, pp. 286-297, 2000.
  8. M.R. Endsley, "Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic System," Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 32-64, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
  9. A.P. Henk et al., "On the Integration of Human Performance and Collision Risk Simulation Models of Runway Operation," NLR, Amsterdam.
  10. W. Patricia et al. "A Platoon-Level Model of Communication Flow and the Effects on Operator Performance," ARLMR-0656, 2006.
  11. M. Tina et al. "Predicting Performance and Situation Awareness of Robot Operators in Complex Situations by Unit Task Tests," ACHI 2012: The Fifth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, 2012.
  12. M.L. Cummings and P.J. Mitchell, "Predicting controller capacity in supervisory control of multiple UAVs," Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 451-460, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2007.914757
  13. L.A. Breslow et al. "Dynamic Operator Overload: A Model for Predicting Workload During Supervisory Control," Human-Machine Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 30-40. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2013.2293317
  14. Wickens et al. "Engineering Psychology and Human Performance," New York: Pearson Education, Inc., pp. 3-6, 2013.
  15. J.H. McCrasken and T.B. Aldrich, "Analysis of selected LHX mission functions: Implications for operator workload and system automation goals," Technical Note ASI479-024-84. Fort Rucker, AL: Army Research Institute Aviation Research and Development Activity, 1984.
  16. J. Keller, "Human Performance Modeling For Discrete-Event Simulation: Workload," In Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, 2002.
  17. S.G. Hart, "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research," NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field. California.
  18. E. Hollnagel and D. Woods, "Joint Cognitive Systems," CRC Press, pp. 149-155, 2005.
  19. J.S. Carson II, "Introduction to Modeling and Simulation," In Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004.
  20. A. Borshchev, "The Big Book Simulation Modeling," Anylogic North America, pp. 60-63, 2013.
  21. Kurt Jensen, Coloured Petri Nets, Springer, 2009.
  22. B.E. Brett et al. "The Combat Automation Requirements Testbed Task1 Final Report: Implementation Concepts and an Example," Interim Report, Human Effectiveness Directorate Crew System Interface Division 2255 H Street Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7022, 2000.
  23. D.B. Catherine, "Advanced Uses for MICRO SAINT Simulation Software," Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, 1997.
  24. S.-Y. Choi, "Application of Agent-Based Multi-Method Simulation Approach to the Simulation Testbed Prototype for the Concept Exploration and Requirement Analysis of UGV," Proceedings 29th European Conference on Modeling and Simulation, 2016.
  25. AnyLogic Inc., 'AnyLogic Home,' Available: http://www.anylogic.com/agent-based-modeling. [Accessed: December 1, 2016]
  26. Eindhoven University of Technology, 'CPN Tools Home,' Available: http://cpntools.org/gettingstarted/start. [Accessed: December 1, 2016]
  27. H.-I. Jeong, N.-M. Hong, C.-J. Woo, and J.-M. Lee, "Cooperative Control of Mobile Robot for Carrying Object," Journal of Korea Robotics Society, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 139-145, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7746/jkros.2015.10.3.139
  28. D.-K. Choi, C.-W. Lee, and C.-j. Lee, "A Graphical User Interface Design for Surveillance and Security Robot," Journal of Korea Robotics Society, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 024-032, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7746/jkros.2015.10.1.024
  29. H.-J. Lee, W.-I. Park, and D.-J. Kim, "Unit Mission Based Mission Planning and Automatic Mission Management for Robots," Journal of the KIMST, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2014.