Health Policy and Management (보건행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (한국보건행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determinants of Welfare Attitudes towards Healthcare Services: Focusing on Self-Interest, Symbolic Attitude, and Sociotropic Perceptions

의료서비스에 대한 복지태도의 결정요인: 자기이해, 상징적 태도, 사회지향적 인식요인들을 중심으로

  • Received : 2017.07.26
  • Accepted : 2017.10.06
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to analyze determinants of welfare attitudes toward healthcare services in South Korea, using three main theories: self-interest (positive welfare attitudes if the policy fulfills people's personal interests), symbolic attitudes (positive welfare attitudes if the person is politically progressive or egalitarian), and sociotropic perception (positive welfare attitudes if the person experienced positive aggregated collective experiences of societal events and trends regarding the policy). Although the definition of the welfare attitude is rather ambiguous in literatures, in this investigation, we operationalize the concept as the 'willingness to pay higher taxes to improve the level of health care services for all people in Korea' which shows individuals' actional propensity. Methods: We used the health module from the International Social Survey Program 2011 for the analysis (N= 1,391). Five logistic regression models were built successively using two variables for each theory to measure key concepts of self-interest, symbolic attitudes, and sociotropic perceptions as independent variables. Results: The result showed self-interest and symbolic attitudes factors to be strong determinants of welfare attitudes towards healthcare services in South Korea, whereas sociotropic perception factors have inconsistent effects. Conclusion: For a more politically elaborated healthcare reform in South Korea and elsewhere, there needs to be further research on various dimensions and determinants of welfare attitudes to understand popular basis of welfare expansion, especially in the era of inequality.

Keywords

References

  1. Page BI, Shapiro RY, Dempsey GR. What moves public opinion? Am Polit Sci Rev 1987;81(1):23-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1960777.
  2. Hasenfeld Y, Rafferty JA. The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state. Soc Forces 1989;67(4):1027-1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/67.4.1027.
  3. Page BI, Shapiro RY. Effects of public opinion on policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 1983;77(01):175-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1956018.
  4. Kim SY. A study on the determinants of Koreans' welfare consciousness: focusing on state's responsibilities upon public agenda. Surv Res 2010;11(1):87-105.
  5. Ham CH, Lee JS. The analysis of factors influencing on welfare attitude of local resident: focus on self-interest, socialization, ideology, and attitude on the recipient. J Soc Sci 2010;26(4):299-325.
  6. Ryu JS. The characteristics and determinants of welfare attitudes. Korean J Soc Welf 2004;56(4):79-101.
  7. Kwon S. The study on determinants of welfare attitudes to child care services. Soc Sci Res Rev 2012;28(4):205-230.
  8. Lee JS. The analysis of factors influencing on welfare attitudes. Soc Welf Policy 2009;36(4):73-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2009.36.4.73.
  9. Kim TI, Choi HJ. The changes of public attitude to welfare state. Korean Soc Secur Stud 2011;27(2):331-356.
  10. Ahn SH, Park JY, Kim SW. The effect of housing-related material interests on Koreans' welfare attitudes: focusing on the variables related to the "housing status". Soc Welf Policy 2013;40(4):375-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2013.40.4.375.
  11. Joo E. Baek J. Class, public welfare experience and welfare attitudes in Korea. Korean J Soc Welf Stud 2007;34:203-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2007.34.203.
  12. Lee HN, Lee MR. A study on factors affecting welfare attitudes of Korean: analyzing effects of equity perception. Health Soc Welf Rev 2010; 30(2):254-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2010.30.2.254.
  13. Sihvo T, Uusitalo H. Attitudes towards the welfare state have several dimensions. Int J Soc Welf 1995;4(4):215-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.1995.tb00107.x.
  14. Roh DM, Jeon JH. Study on welfare attitudes in Korea. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2011.
  15. Taylor-Gooby P. Attitudes to welfare. J Soc Policy 1985;14(1):73-81. Citedfrom Choi G, Ryu JS. On the trend and characteristics of welfare consciousnessin Korea: the duality of responsibility and commitment in socialwelfare. Korean J Soc Welf Stud 2000;16:223-254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400014264
  16. Busemeyer MR. Inequality and the political economy of education: an analysis of individual preferences in OECD countries. J Eur Soc Policy 2012;22(3):219-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440200.
  17. Goerres A, Tepe M. Doing it for the kids?: the determinants of attitudes towards public childcare in unified Germany. J Soc Policy 2012;41(2): 349-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279411000754.
  18. Wendt C, Kohl J, Mischke M, Pfeifer M. How do Europeans perceive their healthcare system?: patterns of satisfaction and preference for state involvement in the field of healthcare. Eur Sociol Rev 2009;26(2):177-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp014.
  19. Ullrich CG. Reciprocity, justice and statutory health insurance in Germany. J Eur Soc Policy 2002;12(2):123-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952872002012002111.
  20. Kulin J, Svallfors S. Class, values, and attitudes towards redistribution: a European comparison. Eur Sociol Rev 2011;29(2):155-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr046.
  21. Blekesaune M. Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. Eur Sociol Rev 2007;23(3):393-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm012.
  22. Linos K, West M. Self-interest, social beliefs, and attitudes to redistribution: re-addressing the issue of cross-national variation. Eur Sociol Rev 2003;19(4):393-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.4.393.
  23. Jakobsen TG. Public versus private: the conditional effect of state policy and institutional trust on mass opinion. Eur Sociol Rev 2009;26(3):307-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp023.
  24. Kim YT, Seo JW. Welfare attitude and welfare institution in Korea: public support for welfare institutions. J Korean Soc Trends Perspect 2014;331-378.
  25. Kim SH, Hong GJ. A study on the welfare attitude of Seoul citizens using the latent class analysis. Soc Welf Policy 2010;37(2):95-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2010.37.2.95.
  26. Sears DO, Funk CL. The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 19991;24:1-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60327-5.
  27. Geum HS, Paek SJ. Ideology, political trust and policy support. Korean J Public Adm 2010;48(4):201-228.
  28. Kumlin S. The personal and the political: how personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology. New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan; 2004.
  29. Jaeger MM. What makes people support public responsibility for welfare provision: self-interest or political ideology?: a longitudinal approach. Acta Sociol 2006;49(3):321-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699306067718.
  30. Gevers J, Gelissen J, Arts W, Muffels R. Public health care in the balance: exploring popular support for health care systems in the European Union. Int J Soc Welf 2000;9(4):301-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.00141.
  31. Andersen R, Curtis J. Social class, economic inequality, and the convergence of policy preferences: evidence from 24 modern democracies. Can Rev Sociol 2015;52(3):266-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12077.
  32. Jeon HJ, Seo DH. The empirical study on welfare attitude of Koreans: focusing on welfare preference, attitude on tax increase. Soc Work Pract Res 2015;12(2):32-62.
  33. Naumann E, Buss C, Bahr J. How unemployment experience affects support for the welfare state: a real panel approach. Eur Sociol Rev 2015; 32(1):81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv094.
  34. Owens LA, Pedulla DS. Material welfare and changing political preferences: the case of support for redistributive social policies. Soc Forces 2014;92(3):1087-1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot101.
  35. Kim YT, Yoo SH, Lee HH. Political dynamics of welfare attitudes in Korea: revaluation of the end of class politics and political opportunities. J Korean Stud 2013;45:183-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17790/kors.2013..45.183.
  36. Kim HJ. A study of the relation between class and the welfare attitudes and regulating effects of education. Korea Soc Policy Rev 2013;20(2):35-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17000/kspr.20.2.201306.35.
  37. Lee HW. Influence of trust of government on social welfare programs: types of welfare states, quality of government and self-interest. Korean J Int Relat 2013;53(2):249-280.
  38. Kim SH. The experience effect of social welfare service for the elderly on welfare perception: double difference analysis using propensity score matching (PSM). Korea Soc Policy Rev 2012;19(1):9-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17000/kspr.19.1.201203.9.
  39. Kim SH. The effect of subjective perception on preference for the universality of the welfare system: the approach using instrument variables. Korean J Soc Welf Stud 2010;41(3):213-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2010.41.3.213.
  40. Blekesaune M, Quadagno J. Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: a comparative analysis of 24 nations. Eur Sociol Rev 2003;19(5):415-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.5.415.
  41. Edlund J. The influence of the class situations of husbands and wives on class identity, party preference and attitudes towards redistribution: Sweden, Germany and the United States. Acta Sociol 2003;46(3):195-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993030463002.
  42. Vilhjalmsson R. Public views on the role of government in funding and delivering health services. Scand J Public Health 2016;44(5):446-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494816631872.
  43. Timberlake JM, Rasinski KA, Lock ED. Effects of conservative sociopolitical attitudes on public support for drug rehabilitation spending. Soc Sci Q 2001;82(1):184-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00016.
  44. Klugman J, Walters PB, Stuber JM, Rosenbaum MS. Social status, values, and support for reform in education. Soc Sci J 2011;48(4):722-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2011.03.011.
  45. Fong C. Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. J Public Econ 2001;82(2):225-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00141-9.
  46. Schlesinger M, Lee T. Is health care different?: popular support of federal health and social policies. J Health Polit Policy Law 1993;18(3):551-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-18-3-551.
  47. Gerxhani K, Koster F. 'I am not alone': understanding public support for the welfare state. Int Sociol 2012;27(6):768-787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580911423060.