생태와환경 (Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment)

  • 제50권4호
  • /
  • Pages.403-410
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2288-1115(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1123(eISSN)
한국수생태학회 (The Korean Society of Limnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하천차수에 따른 피라미와 참갈겨니 개체군의 생태지표 특성 비교

Comparison on Ecological Index Characteristics between Zacco platypus and Zacco koreanus by Stream order in Korea

  • 이승현 (국립환경과학원 유역생태연구팀) ;
  • 정현기 (국립환경과학원 유역생태연구팀) ;
  • 신현선 (농촌진흥청 연구정책국 기후변화팀) ;
  • 신유나 (국립환경과학원 유역생태연구팀) ;
  • 이수웅 (국립환경과학원 유역생태연구팀) ;
  • 이재관 (국립환경과학원 물환경연구부)
  • Lee, Seung-Hyun (Watershed Ecology Research Team, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Jeong, Hyun-Gi (Watershed Ecology Research Team, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Shin, Hyun-Seon (Climate Change Team, R&D Coordination Division, Rural Development of Administration) ;
  • Shin, Yuna (Watershed Ecology Research Team, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Su-Woong (Watershed Ecology Research Team, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kwan (Water Environment Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.30
  • 심사 : 2017.12.18
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 2008년부터 2016년까지 1차부터 7차까지 총 12,873지점을 대상으로 하천차수별 어류분포를 조사하였다. 하천차수에 따른 피라미와 참갈겨니 개체군의 분포 양상에서 차이를 보였으며, 상관관계 분석 결과 두 개체군간 잠재적인 경쟁관계 가능성을 확인하였다. 두 개체군과 다른 공서 어류의 생태특성은 하천차수의 구배에 따라 중간종, 민감종, 내성종, 육식종, 초식종, 잡식종 등 뚜렷한 구배가 나타나는 반면, 충식종의 경우 뚜렷한 구배가 나타나지 않았다. 어류의 생태특성에 따르면, 피라미의 경우 중간종이면서 잡식종, 참갈겨니의 경우 민감종이면서 충식종으로 구분이 되는데, 두 개체군은 내성도 길드의 중간종과 민감종, 섭식 특성 길드의 잡식종과 충식종에서 유사한 상관관계의 변화를 보였지만, 두 개체군은 생태특성에 따른 각 기능군과 서로 다른 상관성의 차이를 보였다. 어류평가지수는 하천차수의 증가에 따라 감소하는 경향을 보였으며, 상관관계 분석 결과 두 개체군은 하천차수별 상관성의 차이를 보였지만, 1차에서 4차까지 유사한 상관관계의 변화를 보였으며, 5차부터 7차까지 차이를 보였다.

We collected fishes at the 12,873 sites in stream order (1~7) from 2008 to 2016. In the results, two populations(Zacco platypus and Zacco koreanus) represented distributional differences in the stream order gradient, and correlation analysis showed that the two populations had a potential competitive relationship. The ecological characteristics of the fish except for the Z. platypus and the Z. koreanus, according to the gradient of stream order showed a pronounced gradient in the species such as intermediate species, sensitive species, carnivores, herbivores and omnivores. The two populations showed a high correlation between intermediate species, sensitive species of the tolerance guild and omnivores, insectivores of the trophic guild. Fish assessment index (FAI) was negative relation with stream order. According to the stream order gradient, the two populations showed different correlations with FAI.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An, G.K. and J.H. Kim. 2005. A diagnosis of ecological health using physical habitat assessment and multimetric fish model in Daejeon Stream. Korean Society of Limnology 38(3): 361-371.
  2. An, K.G., D.H. Yeom and S.K. Lee. 2001. Rapid Biomassessments of Kap stream using the index of biological integrity. Korean Society of Environmental Biology 19(4): 261-269.
  3. Anderson, R.O. and R.M. Neumann. 1996. Length, Weight, and Associated Structural Indices. pp. 447-482. In: Fisheries Techniques(Murphy, B.R. and D.W. Willis, eds.). American Fisheries Society, Betheda, Maryland, USA.
  4. Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, 2nd Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Washington D.C.
  5. Beyer, J.E. 1987. On length-weight relationships computing the mean weight of the fish of a given length class. Fishbyte 5(1): 11-13.
  6. Bolger, T. and P.L. Connoly. 1989. The selection indices for the measurement and analysis of fish condition. Journal of Fish Biology. 30: 171-182.
  7. Byeon, H.K. 2013. The Fish Fauna Changes and Characteristics populations of Zacco koreanus in Cheonggye Stream after the Rehabilitation, Korea. Korean Society of Environment and Ecology 27(6): 695-703. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2013.27.6.695
  8. Chae, B.S. and H.N. Yoon. 2010. Habitat Segregation between NE and NS Type of Zacco koreanus (Cyprinidae). Korean Journal of Ichthyology 22(1): 49-55.
  9. Choi, S.Y., J.H. Han, J.W. Choi and K.G. An. 2017. Trophic gradients of two minnow species with similar eco-type and their relations to water chemistry and multimetric biological integrity. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 10(3): 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2017.06.008
  10. Gal, J.K., M.S. Kim, Y.J. Lee, J. Seo and K.H. Shin. 2012. Foodweb of Aquatic Ecosystem within the Tamjin River through the Determination of Carbon and Nitrogen Stable Isotope Ratios. Korean Society of Limnology 45: 242-251.
  11. Gorman, O.T. and J.R. Karr. 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936581
  12. Hong, Y.P. 1991. A study on distribution and population dynamics of pale chub (Zacco platypus) and dark chub (Zacco temminckii) in Han River watershed. PhD thesis. Daejeon. Korea: Chungnam National University.
  13. Hur, J.W., S.Y. Park, S.U. Kang and J.K. Kim. 2009. Physical Habitat Assessment of Pale Chub (Zacco platypus) to Stream Orders in the Geum River Basin. Korean Society of Environmental Biology 27(4): 397-405.
  14. Hur, J.W. and J.W. Seo. 2011. Investigation on physical Habitat Condition of Korean Chub (Zacco koreanus) in Typical Streams of the Han River. Environmental Impact Assessment 20(2): 206-214.
  15. Jones, J.P.G., F.B. Andriahajania and N.J. Hockley. 2005. A multidisciplinary approach to assessing the sustainability of freshwater crayfish harvesting in Madagascar. Conservation Biology 19: 1863-1871.
  16. Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of Biotic Integrity using Fish Communities. Fisheries 6: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2
  17. Karr, J.R. and D.R. Dudley. 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Management 5(1): 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866609
  18. Karr, J.R. and E.W. Chu. 1999. Restoring life in running waters: better biological monitoring Island Press. Covelo. California. USA. 206pp.
  19. Kim, C.H., W.O. Lee, K.E. Hong, C.H. Lee and J.H. Kim. 2006. Ichthylofauna and Fish Community structure in Namdae Stream, Yangyang, Korea. Korean Journal of Ichthyology 18(2): 112-118.
  20. Kim, I.S. 1997. Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna & flora of Korean Vol. 37 Freshwater Fishes. Ministry of Education, p. 518.
  21. Kim, I.S. and J.Y. Park. 2002. Freshwater fishes of Korea. Kyohak Press Co., Seoul, p. 465.
  22. Kim, I.S., M.K. Oh and K. Hosoya. 2005. A new Species of cyprinid fish, Zacco koreanus with redescription of Z. temminckii (Cyprinidae) from Korea. Korean Journal of Ichthyology 17(1): 1-7.
  23. Kim, S.Y. and K.G. An. 2015. Nutrient regime, N : P ratios and suspended solids as key factors influencing fish tolerance, trophic compositions, and stream ecosystem health. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 38(4): 505-515. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.053
  24. Ko, D.G., J.H. Han and K.G. An. 2012. Length-Weight Relations and Condition Factor (K) of Zacco platypus Along Trophic Gradients in Reservoir Ecosystems. Korean Society of Limnology 45(2): 174-189.
  25. Lee, S.H., H.G. Lee, S.J. Park, S.H. Lee and J.K. Choi. 2014. Distribution Characteristics of Fish Community to Stream Order in Namhan River Watershed. Korean Society of Limnology 47(1S): 100-115. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2014.47(S).100
  26. Lee, S.J. and K.G. An. 2016. Distributions of Endangered Fish Species and Their Relations to Chemical Water Quality-Ecological Stream Health in Geum-River Watershed. Korean Society of Environment and Ecology 30(6): 986-995. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2016.30.6.986
  27. Lee, S.J., H.S. Park and K.G. An. 2017. Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessments on Fish Compositions and the Ecological Health of Jeokbyeok River on the Road Construction of Muju-Geumsan Region. Environmental Impact Assessment 26(1): 27-43. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2017.26.1.27
  28. Matthews, W. 1986. Fish faunal "break" and stream order in the eastern and central United States. Environmental Biology of Fishes 17:81-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001739
  29. Ministry of Environment. 2011. Stream/River Ecosystem Survey and Health Assessment. National Institute of Environmental Research. pp. 333.
  30. Moon, W.K., D.Y. Bae, J.W. Seo and K.G. An. 2012. Fish distribution and compositions along with altitude and longitudinal distance from the river mouth in the Tamjin River Basin, Korea. Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 28(4): 512-522.
  31. Moon, W.K., J.H. Han and K.G. An. 2010. Fish fauna and community analysis in Heuck Stream Watershed. Korean Society of Limnology 43(1): 69-81.
  32. Nelson, J.S. 2006. Fishes of The World. 4th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc. pp. 397-398.
  33. Ohio, E.P.A. 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: VolumeI, II, III. Ohio EPA Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Surface Water Section. Columbus.
  34. Platts, W.S. 1979. Relationships among stream order, fish populations, and aquatic geomorphology in an Idaho River drainage. Fisheries 4(2): 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1979)004<0005:RASOFP>2.0.CO;2
  35. Steedman, R.J. 1998. Modification and assessment of an index of biotic integrity to quantify stream quality in southern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 45: 492-501.
  36. Stevens, C., G. Scrimgeour, W. Tonn, C. Paszkowski, M. Sullivan and S. Millar. 2006. Developing and testing of a fished-based index of biological integrity to quantify the health of grassland streams in Alberta. Technical report produced by Alberta Conservation Association, Edmonton Alberta, Canada. 50pp.
  37. Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38(6): 913-920. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913
  38. US EPA. 1991. Technical support document for water quality-based toxic control. EPA 505-2-90-001. US EPA, Office of Water. Washington D.C. USA.
  39. Vieira, T.B. and F.L. Tejerina-Garro. 2014. Assessment of fish assemblages in streams of different orders in the Upper Parana River basin, Central Brazil. Iheringia Serie Zoologia 104(2): 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-476620141042175183
  40. Winemiller, K.O., A.A. Agostinho and E.P. Caramaschi. 2008. Fish Ecology in tropical streams. pp. 107-146. In: Tropical stream ecology (Dudgeon, D., ed.). Amsterdam, Elsevier.
  41. Yoder, C.O. and M.A. Smith. 1999. Using fish assemblages in a state biological assessment and criteria program: essential concepts and considerations. Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. p. 17-56.