DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cadaverine Production by Using Cross-Linked Enzyme Aggregate of Escherichia coli Lysine Decarboxylase

  • Received : 2016.08.13
  • Accepted : 2016.10.11
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

Lysine decarboxylase (CadA) converts ${\small{L}}-lysine$ into cadaverine (1,5-pentanediamine), which is an important platform chemical with many industrial applications. Although there have been many efforts to produce cadaverine through the soluble CadA enzyme or Escherichia coli whole cells overexpressing the CadA enzyme, there have been few reports concerning the immobilization of the CadA enzyme. Here, we have prepared a cross-linked enzyme aggregate (CLEA) of E. coli CadA and performed bioconversion using $CadA^{CLEA}$. $CadA^{free}$ and $CadA^{CLEA}$ were characterized for their enzymatic properties. The optimum temperatures of $CadA^{free}$ and $CadA^{CLEA}$ were $60^{\circ}C$ and $55^{\circ}C$, respectively. The thermostability of $CadA^{CLEA}$ was significantly higher than that of $CadA^{free}$. The optimum pH of both enzymes was 6.0. $CadA^{free}$ could not be recovered after use, whereas $CadA^{CLEA}$ was rapidly recovered and the residual activity was 53% after the $10^{th}$ recycle. These results demonstrate that $CadA^{CLEA}$ can be used as a potential catalyst for efficient production of cadaverine.

Keywords

References

  1. Bhatia SK, Kim YH, Kim HJ, Seo HM, Kim JH, Song HS, et al. 2015. Biotransformation of lysine into cadaverine using barium alginate-immobilized Escherichia coli overexpressing CadA. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 38: 2315-2322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1465-9
  2. Cassan F, Maiale S, Masciarelli O, Vidal A, Luna V, Ruiz O. 2009. Cadaverine production by Azospirillum brasilense and its possible role in plant growth promotion and osmotic stress mitigation. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 45: 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.08.003
  3. Li M, Li D, Huang Y, Liu M, Wang H, Tang Q, Lu F. 2014. Improving the secretion of cadaverine in Corynebacterium glutamicum by cadaverine-lysine antiporter. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41: 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-014-1409-4
  4. Kind S, Wittmann C. 2011. Bio-based production of the platform chemical 1,5-diaminopentane. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91: 1287-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3457-2
  5. Steinbuchel A. 2005. Non-biodegradable biopolymers from renewable resources: perspectives and impacts. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16: 607-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2005.10.011
  6. Willke T, Vorlop KD. 2004. Industrial bioconversion of renewable resources as an alternative to conventional chemistry. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66: 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1733-0
  7. Kind S, Neubauer S, Becker J, Yamamoto M, Völkert M, Abendroth GV, et al. 2014. From zero to hero - production of bio-based nylon from renewable resources using engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab. Eng. 25: 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2014.05.007
  8. Li N, Chou H, Yu L, Xu Y. 2014. Cadaverine production by heterologous expression of Klebsiella oxytoca lysine decarboxylase. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 19: 965-972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-014-0352-6
  9. Kim HJ, Kim YH, Shin JH, Bhatia SK, Sathiyanarayanan G, Seo HM, et al. 2015. Optimization of direct lysine decarboxylase biotransformation for cadaverine production with whole-cell biocatalysts at high lysine concentration. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 1108-1113. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1412.12052
  10. Meng SY, Bennett GN. 1992. Nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli cad operon: a system for neutralization of low extracellular pH. J. Bacteriol. 174: 2659-2669. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.174.8.2659-2669.1992
  11. Samartzidou H, Mehrazin M, Xu Z, Benedik MJ, Delcour AH. 2003. Cadaverine inhibition of porin plays a role in cell survival at acidic pH. J. Bacteriol. 185: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.1.13-19.2003
  12. Soksawatmaekhin W, Kuraishi A, Sakata K, Kashiwagi K, Igarashi K. 2004. Excretion and uptake of cadaverine by CadB and its physiological functions in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 51: 1401-1412. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03913.x
  13. Chattopadhyay MK, Tabor CW, Tabor H. 2003. Polyamines protect Escherichia coli cells from the toxic effect of oxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2261-2265. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2627990100
  14. Kang IH, Kim JS, Kim EJ, Lee JK. 2007. Cadaverine protects Vibrio vulnificus from superoxide stress. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17: 176-179.
  15. Kim JS, Choi SH, Lee JK. 2006. Lysine decarboxylase expression by Vibrio vulnificus is induced by SoxR in response to superoxide stress. J. Bacteriol. 188: 8586-8592. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01084-06
  16. Tkachenko AG. 2004. Mechanisms of protective functions of Escherichia coli polyamines against toxic effect of paraquat, which causes superoxide stress. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 69: 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIRY.0000018950.30452.53
  17. Tkachenko AG, Shumkov AV, Akhova AV. 2009. Adaptive functions of Escherichia coli polyamines in response to sublethal concentrations of antibiotics. Microbiology 78: 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261709010044
  18. Kikuchi Y, Kojima H, Tanaka T, Takatsuka Y, Kamio Y. 1997. Characterization of a second lysine decarboxylase isolated from Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179: 4486-4492. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.179.14.4486-4492.1997
  19. Lemonnier M, Lane D. 1998. Expression of the second lysine decarboxylase gene of Escherichia coli. Microbiology 144: 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-144-3-751
  20. Neely MN, Olson ER. 1996. Kinetics of expression of the Escherichia coli cad operon as a function of pH and lysine. J. Bacteriol. 178: 5522-5528. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.18.5522-5528.1996
  21. Krithika G, Arunachalam J, Priyanka H, Indulekha K. 2011. The two forms of lysine decarboxylase; kinetics and effect of expression in relation to acid tolerance response in E. coli. J. Exp. Sci. 1: 10-21.
  22. Buschke N, Schröder H, Wittmann C. 2011. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for production of 1,5-diaminopentane from hemicellulose. Biotechnol. J. 6: 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201000304
  23. Qian ZG, Xia XX, Lee SY. 2011. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of cadaverine: a five carbon diamine. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108: 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22918
  24. Kim YH, Kim HJ, Shin JH, Bhatia AK, Seo HM, Kim YG, et al. 2015. Application of diethyl ethoxymethylenemalonate (DEEMM) derivatization for monitoring of lysine decarboxylase activity. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 115: 151-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2015.01.018
  25. Kim YH, Sathiyanarayanan G, Kim HJ, Bhatia SK, Seo HM, Kim JH, et al. 2015. A liquid-based colorimetric assay of lysine decarboxylase and its application to enzymatic assay. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 2110-2115. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1505.05063
  26. Mateo C, Palomo JM, Fernandez-Lorente G, Guisan JM, Fernandez-Lafuente R. 2007. Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 40: 1451-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.01.018
  27. Hwang ET, Gu MB. 2013. Enzyme stabilization by nano/ microsized hybrid materials. Eng. Life Sci. 13: 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201100225
  28. Sheldon RA. 2007. Enzyme immobilization: the quest for optimum performance. Adv. Synth. Catal. 349: 1289-1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200700082
  29. Han JY, Kim HK. 2011. Transesterification using the crosslinked enzyme aggregate of Photobacterium lipolyticum lipase M37. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21: 1159-1165. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1106.06048
  30. Tischer W, Kasche V. 1999. Immobilized enzymes: crystals or carriers? Trends Biotechnol. 17: 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01322-0
  31. Kanjee U, Gutsche I, Alexopoulos E, Zhao B, El Bakkouri M, Thibault G, et al. 2011. Linkage between the bacterial acid stress and stringent responses: the structure of the inducible lysine decarboxylase. EMBO J. 30: 931-944. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.5
  32. Vienozinskien J, Januseviciut R, Pauliukonis A, Kazlauskas D. 1985. Lysine decarboxylase assay by the pH-stat method. Anal. Biochem. 146: 180-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(85)90413-0
  33. Kartal F, Kilinc A. 2012. Crosslinked aggregates of Rhizopus oryzae lipase as industrial biocatalysts: preparation, optimization, characterization, and application for enantioselective resolution reactions. Biotechnol. Prog. 28: 937-945. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1571
  34. Mahmod SS, Yusof F, Jami MS, Khanahmadi S. 2016. Optimizing the preparation conditions and characterization of a stable and recyclable cross-linked enzyme aggregate (CLEA)-protease. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 3: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-015-0081-5
  35. Perez DI, van Rantwijk F, Sheldon RA. 2009. Cross-linked enzyme aggregates of chloroperoxidase: synthesis, optimization and characterization. Adv. Synth. Catal. 351: 2133-2139. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200900303
  36. Ugwu SO, Apte SP. 2004. The effect of buffers on protein conformational stability. Pharm. Technol. 28: 86-109.

Cited by

  1. In Silico Analysis of Putrefaction Pathways in Bacteria and Its Implication in Colorectal Cancer vol.8, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02166
  2. A Synthetic Reaction Cascade Implemented by Colocalization of Two Proteins within Catalytically Active Inclusion Bodies vol.7, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.8b00274
  3. Catalytically active inclusion bodies of L-lysine decarboxylase from E. coli for 1,5-diaminopentane production vol.8, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24070-2
  4. Protein‐Rich Biomass Waste as a Resource for Future Biorefineries: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities vol.12, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201802418
  5. Recent Developments in Carriers and Non-Aqueous Solvents for Enzyme Immobilization vol.9, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9080647
  6. Tailoring the properties of (catalytically)-active inclusion bodies vol.18, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1081-5
  7. Cadaverine Production From L-Lysine With Chitin-Binding Protein-Mediated Lysine Decarboxylase Immobilization vol.8, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00103
  8. Effects of Amino Acid Decarboxylase Genes and pH on the Amine Formation of Enteric Bacteria From Chinese Traditional Fermented Fish (Suan Yu) vol.11, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01130
  9. Protein crosslinking: Uses in chemistry, biology and biotechnology vol.38, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/10242422.2020.1733990
  10. Catalytically-active inclusion bodies for biotechnology—general concepts, optimization, and application vol.104, pp.17, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10760-3
  11. Cellular Engineering and Biocatalysis Strategies toward Sustainable Cadaverine Production: State of the Art and Perspectives vol.9, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07414
  12. Green chemical and biological synthesis of cadaverine: recent development and challenges vol.11, pp.39, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra02764f
  13. Novel enzyme-metal-organic framework composite for efficient cadaverine production vol.176, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2021.108222
  14. Comparison of the metabolic responses of eight Escherichia coli strains including the “big six” in pea sprouts to low concentration electrolysed water by NMR spectroscopy vol.131, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108458