DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Geographic Indices Describing Health Care Utilization

  • Kim, Agnus M. (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jong Heon (Big Data Steering Department, National Health Insurance Service) ;
  • Kang, Sungchan (Institute of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University Medical Research Center) ;
  • Kim, Yoon (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.10.14
  • Accepted : 2016.12.19
  • Published : 2017.01.31

Abstract

Objectives: The accurate measurement of geographic patterns of health care utilization is a prerequisite for the study of geographic variations in health care utilization. While several measures have been developed to measure how accurately geographic units reflect the health care utilization patterns of residents, they have been only applied to hospitalization and need further evaluation. This study aimed to evaluate geographic indices describing health care utilization. Methods: We measured the utilization rate and four health care utilization indices (localization index, outflow index, inflow index, and net patient flow) for eight major procedures (coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, surgery after hip fracture, knee replacement surgery, caesarean sections, hysterectomy, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans) according to three levels of geographic units in Korea. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance database in Korea. We evaluated the associations among the health care utilization indices and the utilization rates. Results: In higher-level geographic units, the localization index tended to be high, while the inflow index and outflow index were lower. The indices showed different patterns depending on the procedure. A strong negative correlation between the localization index and the outflow index was observed for all procedures. Net patient flow showed a moderate positive correlation with the localization index and the inflow index. Conclusions: Health care utilization indices can be used as a proxy to describe the utilization pattern of a procedure in a geographic unit.

Keywords

References

  1. Thygesen LC, Baixauli-Perez C, Librero-Lopez J, Martinez-Lizaga N, Ridao-Lopez M, Bernal-Delgado E, et al. Comparing variation across European countries: building geographical areas to provide sounder estimates. Eur J Public Health 2015;25 Suppl 1:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku229
  2. Volinn E, Diehr P, Ciol MA, Loeser JD. Why does geographic variation in health care practices matter? (And seven questions to ask in evaluating studies on geographic variation). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19(18 Suppl):2092S-2100S. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199409151-00012
  3. Kim AM, Park JH, Kang S, Hwang K, Lee T, Kim Y. The effect of geographic units of analysis on measuring geographic variation in medical services utilization. J Prev Med Public Health 2016;49(4):230-239. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.034
  4. Dartmouth Medical School, Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences. The Dartmouth atlas of health care. Chicago: American Hospital Pub.; 1996, p. 15, 22.
  5. Kilaru AS, Wiebe DJ, Karp DN, Love J, Kallan MJ, Carr BG. Do hospital service areas and hospital referral regions define discrete health care populations? Med Care 2015;53(6):510-516. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000356
  6. Klauss G, Staub L, Widmer M, Busato A. Hospital service areas -- a new tool for health care planning in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res 2005;5:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-33
  7. Song YJ. The South Korean health care system. Japan Med Assoc J 2009;52(3):206-209.
  8. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Focus on health: geographic variations in health care; 2014 [cited 2016 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/FOCUS-on-Geographic-Variations-in-Health-Care.pdf.
  9. Tu JV, Ko DT, Guo H, Richards JA, Walton N, Natarajan MK, et al. Determinants of variations in coronary revascularization practices. CMAJ 2012;184(2):179-186. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111072
  10. Brownlee S, Wennberg JE, Barry MJ, Fisher ES, Goodman DC, Bynum JP. Improving patient decision-making in health care: a 2011 Dartmouth atlas report highlighting Minnesota; 2011 [cited 2017 Jan 11]. Available from: http://www.dartmouthatlas. org/downloads/reports/Decision_making_report_022411.pdf.
  11. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators [cited 2017 Jan 11]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/health-at-a-glance-19991312.htm.
  12. Wagner M. Choosing caesarean section. Lancet 2000;356(9242):1677-1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03169-X
  13. Penna L, Arulkumaran S. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;82(3):399-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00217-0
  14. Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M. Surgery for hip fractures: does surgical delay affect outcomes? Indian J Orthop 2011;45(1):27-32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.73660
  15. Moran CG, Wenn RT, Sikand M, Taylor AM. Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(3):483-489.
  16. Bottle A, Aylin P. Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study. BMJ 2006;332(7547):947-951. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38790.468519.55
  17. Turner P, Cocks J, Cade R, Ewing H, Collopy B, Thompson G. Fractured neck of the femur (DRG 210/211): prospective outcome study. Aust N Z J Surg 1997;67(2-3):126-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb01917.x
  18. Hawker GA. Who, when, and why total joint replacement surgery? The patient's perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006;18(5):526-530.
  19. Openshaw S, Taylor PJ. A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. Stat Appl Spat Sci 1999;21:127-144.

Cited by

  1. An ecological study of geographic variation and factors associated with cesarean section rates in South Korea vol.19, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2300-0
  2. Factors associated with the rates of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention vol.19, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1264-3
  3. Geographic variation and factors associated with rates of knee arthroplasty in Korea-a population based ecological study vol.20, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2766-y
  4. Presence of Thrombectomy-capable Stroke Centers Within Hospital Service Areas Explains Regional Variation in the Case Fatality Rate of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Korea vol.54, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.21.329