Education of Primary School Mathematics (한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on the Motivations in the Elementary Mathematics Lessons

초등수학 수업의 동기 유발 방법 분석

  • Received : 2017.01.17
  • Accepted : 2017.01.31
  • Published : 2017.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was to analyze motivations in the mathematics lessons from the perspectives of preservice elementary school teachers. The participants were three groups of 62 preservice elementary teachers who were sophomore or junior students in Seoul city in Korea. Two groups of the students were enrolled at teaching and learning mathematics courses, whereas one group of students were at mathematics problem solving course. They were randomly assigned to elementary schools for their student teaching. They were required to observe mathematics lessons focusing on motivations during their participating at the two-week student teaching period. The preservice teachers were asked to observe and submit the reports of the observation in the mathematics lesson. The researcher suggested a guideline of observation and analyzed the reports according to the categories those were suggested in the guideline. The results of the analysis on the reports are summarized as follows. First, the preservice elementary school teachers considered the purpose of motivations as attracting students' interest. Second, the major ratio of motivations were attracting students' attention in the mathematics lessons. Third, the duration average time was 5 minutes 50 seconds and only limited materials for the motivations. At last, most mathematics lessons need to stimulate students' curiosity that fits to the objectives of the lessons. The researcher suggests that we need to develop various motivations in mathematics lessons with which teachers should subtlely connected to the objectives of the lessons.

본 연구의 목적은 초등 예비교사들의 관점에서 수학 수업을 관찰하면서 동기 유발의 측면을 중심으로 동기 유발의 내용 및 방법, 그리고 예비교사들의 동기 유발에 대하여 분석하는 것이다. 연구 참여자들은 서울 지역의 2학년 또는 3학년에 재학 중인 예비교사 62명이었다. 이 예비교사들이 1주 또는 2주간의 교육실습 중 수학수업의 동기 유발 부분을 집중적으로 관찰한 후, 자신들의 관점에서 수학 수업에서의 동기 유발에 대한 분석한 결과와 의견을 제시하도록 하였다. 연구 결과, 예비교사들은 동기 유발을 주로 학생들의 흥미를 진작하기 위한 것과 주위집중을 위한 것으로 생각하였다. 동기 유발의 시간은 평균 5분 50초이고, 제한된 자료만을 사용하여 동기를 유발하였다. 연구자는 동기 유발 내용 및 방법이 차시의 목표와 세밀하게 연계할 수 있는 방안에 대한 후속 연구를 제언하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고미숙 (2007). 공부의 달인 호모 쿵푸스. 서울: 그린비.(Ko, M. S. (2007). Study export homokugfus. Seoul: Greenbi.)
  2. 교육부 (2015). 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호.(The Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Revised mathematics curriculum. The Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74.)
  3. 권대훈 (2009). 교육 심리학의 이론과 실제(2판), 서울: 학지사.(Kwon, D. H. (2009). Theory and practice of educational psychology(2nd ed..). Seoul: HakJiSa.)
  4. 김경희.김수진.김미영.김선희 (2009). PISA와 TIMSS 상위국과 우리나라의 교육과정 및 성취 특성 비교 분석. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고서 PRE 2009-7-2.(Kim, K. H., Kim, S. J., Kim, M. Y., & Kim. S. H. (2009). Comparative analysis of curriculum and achievement characteristics between Korea and high performing countries in PISA & TIMSS. A Report of Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, PRE 2009-7-2.)
  5. 김동렬.문두호.손연아 (2006). 중등 생물 교육에서 ARCS 수업 실태 및 교사의 인식 조사를 통한 동기 유발 전략의 수업 적용 방안 탐색. 한국생물교육학회지, 34(2), 185-200.(Kim, D. R., Moon, D. H., & Son, Y. A. (2006). The research on motivation strategies' lesson applications by studying ARCS programs and teachers' recognition in secondary school biology education. Biology Education, 34(2), 185-200.)
  6. 김병무 (1997). 흥미 및 동기 유발을 위한 대학 수학수업 자료와 평가. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 36(2), 127-133.(Kim, B. M. (1997). University mathematics instructional materials and evaluation for interest and motivation. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A : The Mathematical Education, 36(2), 127-133.)
  7. 남영만.이혜령 (2010). 수학 학습 불안에 영향을 주는 스트레스에 관한 연구. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 28(2), 251-266.(Nam, Y. M. & Lee, H. R. (2010). A study on the correlation between students's stress and mathematics anxiety. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 28(2), 251-266.)
  8. 문병상 (2013). 수학교과의 내재적 동기와 유능감 신념의 관계에 대한 종단 연구. 교육심리연구, 27(3), 595-609.(Moon, B. S. (2013). A longitudinal study on the relationship between intrinsic motivation and competence beliefs about mathematics. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(3), 595-609.)
  9. 박경자.이혜령 (2010). 수학 학습 불안에 영향을 주는 스트레스에 관한 연구. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 28(2), 251-266.(Park, K. J. & Lee, H. R. (2010). A study on the correlation between students's stress and mathematics anxiety. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 28(2), 251-266.)
  10. 박만구.고상숙.정인철.김은영 (2010). 기하 교구의 활용이 공간 지각 능력에 미치는 영향. 한국학교수학회논문집, 13(2), 303-322.(Park, M. G., Ko, S. S., Jung, I. C., & Kim, E. Y. (2010). The effects of using the geometric manipulative for the development of spatial sense. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 13(2), 303-322.)
  11. 백소영.김도현.이경언 (2014). 수업 시연에 나타나는 예비 수학교사의 발문 유형과 특성 분석. 교사교육연구, 53(3), 400-415.(Baek, S. Y., Kim, D. H., & Lee, K. E. (2014). An analysis of the types and characteristics of pre-service mathematics teachers' questioning in demonstrative lessons. Teacher Education Research, 53(3), 400-415.)
  12. 사교육걱정없는세상 (2015). 고등학생의 약 60%, 수포자(수학을 포기한 학생). 2017년 1월 5일 http://data.noworry.kr/170에서 발췌.(Sagyuyukgukjungeuteunsaesang (2015). About 60% of out high school students, math-give-uppers. Retrieved on January 5, 2017 from http://data.noworry.kr/170)
  13. 성열욱.김상운 (2001). 동기 유발을 위한 ARCS이론을 적용한 수업이 수학과 문제해결력 신장에 미치는 영향. 한국학교수학회논문집, 4(2), 93-102.(Sung, Y. W. & Kim, S. W. (2001). The effectiveness of the ARCS model which is adapted to improve the solution of mathematical problems for the induction of motivation in learners. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 4(2), 93-102.)
  14. 심상길.이강섭 (2014). 수학교사들의 동기 유발에 대한 필요성과 활용에 대한 인식. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 53(2), 449-462.(Sim, S. K. & Lee, K. S. (2014). An analysis of mathematics teachers' perceptions about motivation. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 53(2), 449-462.)
  15. 오후진.이유심 (2002). 수학과 동기 유발을 위한 학습자료의 활용에 관한 연구. 과학교육연구, 33, 103-116.(Oh, H. J. & Lee, Y. S. (2002). The study on using teaching materials in mathematics for stimulating learners. Journal of Research in Science Education, 33, 103-116.)
  16. 이인숙.한승연.임병노 (2010). 교육공학 교육방법. 서울: 문음사.(Lee, I. S., Han, S. Y., & Lim, B. N. (2010). Educational engineering and educational methods. Seoul: Munemsa.)
  17. 이종욱 (2007). 동기에 대한 고찰: 수학 학업성취와 관련하여. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 46(1), 1-18.(Lee, J. W. (2007). Motivation for achievement in mathematics. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A : The Mathematical Education, 46(1), 1-18.)
  18. 최승현.박상욱.황혜정 (2014). PISA와 TIMSS 결과에 나타난 우리나라 학생의 정의적 성취 실태 분석 - 수학 교과를 중심으로 -. 한국학교수학회논문집, 17(1), 23-43.(Choi, S. H., Park, S. W., & Hwang, H. J. (2014). Analysis of the current situation of affective characteristics of Korean students based on the results of PISA and TIMSS. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(1), 23-43.)
  19. 하태경.심규철.김현섭.박영철 (2008). 과학 교과에서 학습 동기 전략을 활용한 4E&E 순환학습모형의 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), 527-545.(Ha, T. K., Sim, K. C., Kim, H. S., & Park, Y. C. (2008). Development of 4E&E learning cycle model using learning motivation for school science. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 28(6), 527-545.)
  20. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  21. Brahier, D. J. (2011). Motivation and disposition: The hidden curriculum. In D. J. Brahier & W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics (Vol. 73rd Yearbook, pp. 1-8). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  22. Chen, C., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparison of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x
  23. Dossey, J. A., Mullis, I. V. S., Lindquist, M. M., & Chambers, D. L. (1988). The mathematics report card. Are we measuring up? Trends and achievement based in the 1986 national assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  24. Duda, J. I. & Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.290
  25. Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.631
  26. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905967
  27. Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 289-309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0504_3
  28. Middleton, J. A. & Spaniaz, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/749630
  29. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development[OECD] (2012). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. OECD PISA 2012 report. Retrieved on September 5, 2014 at http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm
  30. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development[OECD] (2014a), PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do-Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved on March 1, 2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
  31. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development[OECD] (2014b), PISA 2012 Results in focus what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. PISA. OECD Publishing. Retrieved on March 1, 2016 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
  32. Talvitie-Siple, J. (2007). Students' motivation to learn: An evaluation of perceptions, pedagogy, and design in one-learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  33. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center. (2014). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Retrieved on September 5, 2014 at http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/international-results-mathematics.html
  34. TIMSS and PIRLS International Center (2015). TIMSS 2011. Retrieved on December, 20, 2015 from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/
  35. TIMSS and PIRLS International Center (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Retrieved on November 5, 2016 from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/timss-2015/mathematics/student-achievement/
  36. Usiskin, Z. (ed.) (2011). Motivation and disposition: pathways to learning mathematics. 73rd Yearbook. of NCTM. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  37. Von Glasersfeld (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
  38. Woolfork, A. (2001). Educational psychology(8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  39. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663