DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Sociodynamical Function of Meta-affect in Mathematical Problem-Solving Procedure

수학 문제해결 과정에 작용하는 메타정의의 사회역학적 기능

  • Do, Joowon (Seoul Banghyun Elementary School) ;
  • Paik, Suckyoon (Department of Mathematics Education, Seoul National University of Education)
  • Received : 2017.01.16
  • Accepted : 2017.01.27
  • Published : 2017.01.31

Abstract

In order to improve mathematical problem-solving ability, there has been a need for research on practical application of meta-affect which is found to play an important role in problem-solving procedure. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of the sociodynamical aspects of the meta-affective factor of the successful problem-solving procedure of small groups in the context of collaboration, which is known that it overcomes difficulties in research methods for meta-affect and activates positive meta-affect, and works effectively in actual problem-solving activities. For this purpose, meta-functional type of meta-affect and transact elements of collaboration were identified as the criterion for analysis. This study grasps the characteristics about sociodynamical function of meta-affect that results in successful problem solving by observing and analyzing the case of the transact structure associated with the meta-functional type of meta-affect appearing in actual episode unit of the collaborative mathematical problem-solving activity of elementary school students. The results of this study suggest that it provides practical implications for the implementation of teaching and learning methods of successful mathematical problem solving in the aspect of affective-sociodynamics.

수학 문제해결 능력의 향상을 위한 연구의 일환으로 문제해결 활동 과정에 중요한 역할을 담당하는 것으로 최근에 파악된 메타정의를 수학 학습 지도에 적용하는 연구의 필요성이 제기되어왔다. 이에 본 연구에서는 긍정적인 메타정의의 기능을 활성화시키며 실제 문제해결 활동에 효과적으로 작용하는 것은 물론, 정의적 측면에 대한 연구방법론이 갖는 일반적인 난점의 극복을 위하여 협업의 상황을 설정하였다. 즉, 2인 1조의 소집단 구성원이 협업을 통하여 성공적인 문제해결 과정에 보여주는 메타정의적 요소에 대한 사회역학적 작용 과정의 특성을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 선행연구에서 파악된 메타정의의 메타적 기능 유형과 협업의 교류적 요소를 초등학생의 협업적 문제해결 활동 분석을 위한 준거로 삼았다. 소집단의 협업적 수학 문제해결 활동의 에피소드 단위별로 보여주는 메타정의의 메타적 기능 유형과 이와 결부된 교류적 요소의 구조 사례를 관찰, 분석하여 성공적인 문제해결로 유도하는 메타정의의 사회역학적 기능이 보여주는 특성을 추출하였다. 본 연구의 결과로부터 도출되는 메타정의의 사회역학적 작용 원리는 성공적인 수학 문제해결의 교수 학습 방법 구현을 위한 연구에 정의적, 사회역학적 측면에서 실제적인 시사점을 제공한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강완.김상미.박만구.백석윤.오영열 (2009). 초등수학교육. 서울: 경문사.(Kang, W., Kim, S., Park, M., Paik, S., & Oh, Y. (2009). Elementary mathematics education. Seoul: Kyungmunsa.)
  2. 김선희.김부미.이종희 (2014). 수학교육과 정의적 영역. 서울: 경문사.(Kim, S., Kim, B., & Lee, J. (2014). Mathematics education and Affective domain. Seoul: Kyungmunsa.)
  3. 김선희.박정언 (2011). 수학 학습에서의 메타-정의유형 탐색. 학교수학, 13(3), 469-484.(Kim, S. & Park, J. (2011). Explorating meta-affect types in mathematical learning. Journal of korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics, 13(3), 469-484.)
  4. 도주원.백석윤 (2016). 수학 문제해결에서 메타정의의 기능. 한국초등수학교육학회, 20(4), 563-581.(Do, J. & Paik, S. (2016). The function of meta-affect in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 20(4), 563-581.)
  5. 백석윤 (1994). 메타인지적 문제해결력의 지도를 위한 메타문제 유형의 개발. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈A <수학교육>, 33(2), 177-188.(Paik, S. (1994). Development of meta-problem type for guidance of meta-cognitive problem solving ability. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A, 33(2), 177-188.)
  6. 백석윤 (2016). 수학 문제해결 교육. 서울: 경문사.(Paik, S. (2016). Mathematical problem solving education. Seoul: Kyungmunsa.)
  7. 이종희.김선희 (2002). 수학적 의사소통. 서울: 교우사.(Lee, J. & Kim, S. (2002). Mathematical communication. Seoul: Gyowoosa.)
  8. Beals, L. (2006). Dyadic collaborative problem solving on engineering tasks in a first grade classroom. Master thesis, Tufts University, Medford.
  9. Bowen, B. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Retrieved from http://qrj.sagepub.com.
  10. Brendefur, J. & Frykholm, J. (2000). Prompting mathematical communication in the classroom: two preservice teachers' conceptions and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 125-153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009947032694
  11. Carlson, M. P. & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0808-x
  12. Chalmers, C. (2009). Group metacognition during mathemaitcal problem solving. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia 1. Palmerston North. NZ: MERGA.
  13. Conti, G., & Fellenz, R. (1991). Assessing adult learning strategies. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Adult Education Research Conference, 2-27.
  14. Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International journal of educational research 13, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-X
  15. DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem-solving. In: E. Pekhonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the PME 21 2, 209-216.
  16. DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4
  17. Fawcett, L. M. & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effct of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal of Education Psychology, 75, 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X23411
  18. Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59-72). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  19. Goldin, G. A. (2009). The affective domain and students' mathematical inventiveness. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 181-194). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  20. Goldin, G. A. (2014). Perspectives on emotion in mathematical engagement, learning, and problem solving. In R. Pekrun and L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of Emotions in Education (pp. 391-414). New York : Routledge.
  21. Gomez-Chacon, I. M. (2000). Affective influence in the knowledge of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017518812079
  22. Goos, M. (1995). Metacognitive knowledge, belief and classroom mathematics. In B. Atweh & S. Flavel (Eds.), Galtha(Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of australasia) (pp.300-306). Darwin: MERGA.
  23. Goos, M. & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! Metaconitive strategies in collaborative mathematical problem solving. Educational studies in mathematics, 30(3), 229-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304567
  24. Goos, M., Galbraith, P. & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in smallgroup problem solving. Educational studies in mathematics, 49(2), 193-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016209010120
  25. Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1996). Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: Theoretical models and preliminary data. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(3), 243-268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.10.3.243
  26. Hannula, M. (2001). The metalevel of cognitionemotion interaction. In M. Ahtee, O. Bjorkqvist, E. Pehkonen & Vatanen (Eds.), Research on mathematics and science education: From beliefs to cognition, from problem solving to understanding (pp. 55-65). Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla printing house.
  27. Hannula, M., Evans, J., Philippou, G., & Zan, R., (2004). Affect in mathematics education - exploring theoretical frameworks. Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international Group for the psychology of mathematics education, 1, 107-136.
  28. Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: a literature review. research report. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research.
  29. Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: Key influences on problemsolving behavior. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 75-88). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  30. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
  31. Malmivuori, M. L. (2001). The dynamics of affect, cognition, and social environment in the regulation of personal learning processes: The case of mathematics. Research Report 172. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
  32. Malmivuori, M. L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9022-8
  33. Moscucci, M. (2010). Why is there not enough fuss about affect and meta-affect among mathematics teacher? Proceedings of the CERME-6, 1811-1820.
  34. NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. VA: NCTM.
  35. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
  36. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Ideas in the air: Speculations on small group learning, environmental and cultural influences on cognition, and epistemology. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90017-7
  37. Schoenfeld, A. H.(1999). Looking toward the 21't century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028007004
  38. Schloglmann, W. (2005). Meta-affect and strategies in mathematics learning. Proceeding of CERME-4. 275-284.
  39. Silver, E. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem-solving instruction. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 33-60). NJ: Hillsdale.
  40. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group Interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408. https://doi.org/10.2307/749187

Cited by

  1. 수학 영재아의 문제해결 활동에 대한 메타정의적 관점에서의 특성 분석 vol.58, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.4.519