Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment (한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경)

Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment (한국지하수토양환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Interpretation of Contaminated Soil by Complex Oil

토양 내 복합유종에 의한 오염 해석 연구

  • Lim, Young-Kwan (Research Institute of Petroleum Technology, Korea Petroleum Quality & Distribution Authority) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-Min (Research Institute of Petroleum Technology, Korea Petroleum Quality & Distribution Authority) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Ryeol (Research Institute of Petroleum Technology, Korea Petroleum Quality & Distribution Authority) ;
  • Ha, Jong-Han (Research Institute of Petroleum Technology, Korea Petroleum Quality & Distribution Authority)
  • 임영관 (한국석유관리원 석유기술연구소) ;
  • 김정민 (한국석유관리원 석유기술연구소) ;
  • 김종렬 (한국석유관리원 석유기술연구소) ;
  • 하종한 (한국석유관리원 석유기술연구소)
  • Received : 2016.12.11
  • Accepted : 2017.01.06
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Over 30% of domestic soil contamination has occurred via petroleum products and complex oil. Moreover, contamination by complex oil is more intense than it is by a single petroleum product species. In this study, we analyzed sectional TPH (total petroleum hydrocarbon) pattern and sectional ratio of current domestically distributed petroleum products, such as kerosene, diesel, bunker C, and lubricant and complex oils, to determine pollution characteristics of the soil. In the TPH pattern, kerosene, which is a light distillate, had an early retention time, and lubricant oil, which is a heavy distillate, had a late retention time in the gas chromatogram. In addition, we obtained a complexly contaminated soil via diesel and lubricant oil from the Navy and inspected it for its ratio of complex oil species. The inspection results showed that this soil was contaminated with 85% diesel and 15% lubricant oil. The method developed in this study could be used to determine complex petroleum sources and ratios at sites with accidentally contaminated soil.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, K.E., King, C.K., Kotzakoulakis, K.S., George, C., and Harrison, P.L., 2016, Assessing fuel spill risks in polar water : Temporal dynamics and behaviour of hydrocarbons from Antarctic diesel, marine gas oil and residual fuel oil, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 110(1), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.042
  2. Ha, S.A. and You, M.Y., 2012, A study on treatment of a contaminated soil by oil using continuous system of high temperature heating element and microwave, J. Soil & Groundwater Env., 17, 8-12. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2012.17.1.008
  3. Lim, Y.K., Jung, C.S., and Han, K.W., 2012, Analysis of physical properties and total petroleum hydrocarbon for soil contamination, Appl. Chem. Eng., 23(6), 618-623.
  4. Lim, Y.K., Jung, C.S., Han, K.W., and Jang, Y.J., 2014, Analysis of jet fuel for the judgment of soil polluter, Appl. Chem. Eng., 25(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.14478/ace.2013.1088
  5. Lim, Y.K., Lee, E.Y., Seong, S.R., and Kim, J.R., 2016, Analysis of oil species of illegal disposed oil, Appl. Chem. Eng., 27(6), 664-668. https://doi.org/10.14478/ace.2016.1080
  6. Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, 2016, Business act for quality standard, inspection method and inspection fee of petroleum product, 2016-20.
  7. Ministry of Environment, 2015, Soil measurement network and real state of soil contamination, 93 p.
  8. Ministry of Environment, 2016, Soil Environment Conservation Act, 2016-684.
  9. Park, E.R., Lee, K.R., Seo, C.I., and Cho, C.H., 2012, A field study on the evaluation of slurping and bioaugmentation effect in petroleum contaminate area, J. Soil & Groundwater Env., 17, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2012.17.3.032
  10. Pinedo, J., Ibanez, R., Primo, O., Gomez, P., and Irabien, A., 2014, Preliminary assessment of soil contamination by hydrocarbon storage activities: Main site investigation selection, J. Geochem. Explor., 147, 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.03.016
  11. Sexton, S. and Eyer, J., 2016, Leveling the playing field of transportation fuels : Accounting for indirect emissions of natural gas, Energy Policy, 95, 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.023