DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An efficient ship detection method for KOMPSAT-5 synthetic aperture radar imagery based on adaptive filtering approach

  • Received : 2017.02.07
  • Accepted : 2017.02.21
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

Ship detection in synthetic aperture radar(SAR)imagery has long been an active research topic and has many applications. In this paper,we propose an efficient method for detecting ships from SAR imagery using filtering. This method exploits ship masking using a median filter that considers maximum ship sizes and detects ships from the reference image, to which a Non-Local means (NL-means) filter is applied for speckle de-noising and a differential image created from the difference between the reference image and the median filtered image. As the pixels of the ship in the SAR imagery have sufficiently higher values than the surrounding sea, the ship detection process is composed primarily of filtering based on this characteristic. The performance test for this method is validated using KOMPSAT-5 (Korea Multi-Purpose Satellite-5) SAR imagery. According to the accuracy assessment, the overall accuracy of the region that does not include land is 76.79%, and user accuracy is 71.31%. It is demonstrated that the proposed detection method is suitable to detect ships in SAR imagery and enables us to detect ships more easily and efficiently.

Keywords

References

  1. Armstrong, B., and H. Griffiths, 1991. CFAR detection of fluctuating targets in spatially correlated Kdistributed clutter, Proc. of F Radar Signal Processm IEEE, 138(2): 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-f-2.1991.0020
  2. Alberola-Lopez, C., J.R. Casar-Corredera, and G. de Miguel-Vela, 1999, Object CFAR detection in gamma-distributed textured-background images, Proc. of Vision, Image and Signal Processing, IEE, 146(3): 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-vis:19990236
  3. Buades, A., B. Coll, and J.M. Morel, 2005. A non-local algorithm for image denoising, Proc. of 2005 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society Conference, San Diego, CA, June 20-26, vol. 2, pp. 60-65.
  4. Farr, T.G., P.A. Rosen, E. Caro, R. Crippen, R. Duren, S. Hensley, M. Kobrick, M. Paller, E. Rodriguez, L. Roth, D. Seal, S. Shaffer, J. Shimada, J. Umland, M. Werner, M. Oskin, D. Burbank, and D. Alsdorf, 2007. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, Reviews of Geophysics, 45(2): RG2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005rg000183
  5. Hansen, V., 1973. Constant false alarm rate processing in search radars, Proc. of the Radar Present Future, London, October 23-25, pp. 325-332.
  6. Howard, D., S. Roberts, and R. Brankin, 1999. Target detection in SAR imagery by genetic programming, Advances in Engineering Software, 30(5): 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00093-3
  7. Kaplan, L.M., 2001. Improved SAR target detection via extended fractal features, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 37(2): 436-451. https://doi.org/10.1109/7.937460
  8. Khesali, E., H. Enayatu, M. Modiri, and M.M Aref, 2015. Automatic ship detection in single-Pol-SAR Image using texture features in artificial neural networks, The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 40(1): 395-399.
  9. Ouchi, K., S. Tamaki, H. Yaguchi, and M. Iehara, 2004. Ship detection based on coherence images derived from cross correlation of multilook SAR images, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 1(3): 184-187. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2004.827462
  10. Rohling, H., 1983. Radar CFAR thresholding in clutter and multiple target situations, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 19(4): 608-621. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1983.309350
  11. Souyris, J. C., C. Henry, and F. Adragna, 2003. On the use of complex SAR image spectral analysis for target detection: Assessment of polarimetry, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(12): 2725-2734. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.817809
  12. Van Zyl, J. J., 2001. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM): a breakthrough in remote sensing of topography, Acta Astronautica, 48(5-12): 559-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00020-0
  13. Werner, M., 2001. Shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) mission overview, Frequenz, 55(3-4): 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/FREQ.2001.55.3-4.75
  14. Wang, X., and C. Chen, 2016. Adaptive ship detection in SAR images using variance WIE-based method, Signal, Image and Video Processing, 10(7): 1219-1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-016-0879-4
  15. Wang, C., M. Liao, and X. Li, 2008. Ship detection in SAR image based on the alpha-stable distribution. Sensors, 8(8): 4948-4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8084948

Cited by

  1. Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Ship Detection from X-Band Kompsat-5 Imagery vol.7, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7090961
  2. Automatic Ship Detection Using the Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine from X-Band Sar Satellite Images vol.10, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111799
  3. Land Masking Methods of Sentinel-1 SAR Imagery for Ship Detection Considering Coastline Changes and Noise vol.33, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2017.33.4.9
  4. Groundwater productivity potential mapping using frequency ratio and evidential belief function and artificial neural network models: focus on topographic factors vol.20, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2018.120
  5. 다목적실용위성 영상자료 활용 현황 vol.34, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2018.34.6.3.1
  6. R-CNN-Based Ship Detection from High Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery vol.11, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060631
  7. 다중시기 위성 레이더 영상을 활용한 변화탐지 기술 리뷰 vol.35, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2019.35.5.1.10
  8. Ship Detection from X-Band SAR Images Using M2Det Deep Learning Model vol.10, pp.21, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217751
  9. Performance Comparison of Oil Spill and Ship Classification from X-Band Dual- and Single-Polarized SAR Image Using Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Deep Neural Network vol.13, pp.16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163203