DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy Evaluation of DEM generated from Satellite Images Using Automated Geo-positioning Approach

  • Oh, Kwan-Young (Department of Geoinformatics, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Jung, Hyung-Sup (Department of Geoinformatics, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Moung-Jin (Environmental Assessment Group/Center for Environmental Assessment Monitoring, Korea Environment Institute)
  • Received : 2017.02.10
  • Accepted : 2017.02.20
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

S The need for an automated geo-positioning approach for near real-time results and to boost cost-effectiveness has become increasingly urgent. Following this trend, a new approach to automatically compensate for the bias of the rational function model (RFM) was proposed. The core idea of this approach is to remove the bias of RFM only using tie points, which are corrected by matching with the digital elevation model (DEM) without any additional ground control points (GCPs). However, there has to be a additional evaluation according to the quality of DEM because DEM is used as a core element in this approach. To address this issue, this paper compared the quality effects of DEM in the conduct of the this approach using the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) DEM with the spatial resolution of 90m. and the National Geographic Information Institute (NGII) DEM with the spatial resolution of 5m. One KOMPSAT-2 stereo-pair image acquired at Busan, Korea was used as experimental data. The accuracy was compared to 29 check points acquired by GPS surveying. After bias-compensation using the two DEMs, the Root Mean Square (RMS) errors were less than 6 m in all coordinate components. When SRTM DEM was used, the RMSE vector was about 11.2m. On the other hand, when NGII DEM was used, the RMSE vector was about 7.8 m. The experimental results showed that automated geo-positioning approach can be accomplished more effectively by using NGII DEM with higher resolution than SRTM DEM.

Keywords

References

  1. Ataseven, Y. and A. A. Alatan, 2010. SRTM registration for electro-optic satellite images without GCP, Proc. of 2010 Int. Archives Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Saint-Mande, vol XXXVIII, part. 3A.
  2. Euroconsult, 2010. Satellite-Based Earth Observation, Market Prospects to 2018, Paris, France.
  3. Fraser, C., G. Dial and J. Grodecki, 2006. Sensor orientation via RPCS, ISPRS journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 60(3): 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.11.001
  4. Goncalves, J., 2006. Orientation of SPOT stereopairs by means of matching a relative DEM and the SRTM DEM, Proc. of the International Calibration and Orientation Workshop-EuroCow2006.
  5. Inglada, J. and A. Giros, 2004. On the possibility of automatic multisensor image registration, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(10):2104-2120. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.835294
  6. Leica Geosystems, 2004. ERDAS field guide, Leica Geosystems GIS & Mapping, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia.
  7. NGII, 2014. 2014 National Precision Elevation Model Production Report, National Geographic Information Institute.
  8. Oh, K.Y., and H. S. Jung, 2016. Automated Bias-Compensation Approach for Pushbroom Sensor Modeling Using Digital Elevation Model, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(10):3400-3409. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2517100
  9. Oh, J.H. and C.L. Lee, 2014. Automated biascompensation of rational polynomial coefficients of high resolution satellite imagery based on topographic maps", ISPRS journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Available online 13 March 2014.
  10. Seo, D.C., J.Y. Yang, D.H. Lee, J.H. Song, and H.S. Lim, 2008. Kompsat-2 direct sensor modeling and geometric calibration/validation, Proc. of 2008 The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Beijing, XXXVII(B1): 47-52.
  11. Wang, Y. 1999. Automated triangulation of linear scanner imagery, Proc. Joint ISPRS Workshop on Sensors and Mapping from Space, Hannover, 27-30 September.

Cited by

  1. Groundwater productivity potential mapping using frequency ratio and evidential belief function and artificial neural network models: focus on topographic factors vol.20, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2018.120
  2. Quality Assessment of Four DEMs Generated Using In-Track KOMPSAT-3 Stereo Images vol.2019, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2649809
  3. Spatial Mapping of the Groundwater Potential of the Geum River Basin Using Ensemble Models Based on Remote Sensing Images vol.11, pp.19, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192285