The Comparison Study of Ankle Joint Mobilization and Elongation on the Difference of Weight-bearing Load, Low Back Pain and Flexibility in Flat-foots Subjects

편평족에 대한 관절가동술과 자가신장이 요부의 신장성, 요통과 하지 체중부하 차이에 대한 비교 연구

  • Park, Sung-doo (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Dasarang Yenhap Clinic) ;
  • Yu, Dal-yeong (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Orthopedic Personal Training Excercise Center)
  • 박성두 (다사랑연합의원 재활슬링운동센터) ;
  • 유달영 (OPT 운동센터)
  • Received : 2017.10.24
  • Accepted : 2017.11.13
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the spine and the flat-foot, the stability and the alignment of the posture of the neck to prevent the alignment of the ankle joint operation and the lower back flexibility of the lumbar region according to the type of treatment using active stretching of the triceps, back pain, and to see how they affect weight bearing differences. Methods: The subjects of this study were 24 chronic low back pain patients. They were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. In the experimental group, ankle joint mobilization and active scraping of triceps were performed three times a week for a total of 6 weeks. The control group was performed in the same way without articulation. The range of flexion and extension motion of the lumbar spine and pain degree and difference of weight-bearing were measured before and after the experiment. Results: The model of ankle joint mobilization and calf muscle elongation of flat foot significantly improved the range of flexion and extension motion of the vertebrae (p<.05) and the VAS and distribution of weight-bearing were decreased in both of two groups (p<.05). In other words, the exercise and mobilization help to recover of the balance of the whole musculoskeletal, the vertebrae. Conclusions: The active exercise of the triceps muscle of the lower leg in this study It affects the flexibility of the lumbar spine, the pain and the difference in the weight support of the lower extremities, when we performed ankle joint mobilization for exercise and cramping, pain and the difference in weight support between the two lower limbs.

Keywords

References

  1. 김선엽. 요통환자와 정상인의 양하지 체중지지 차이 비교. 한국전문물리치료학회지. 2001;8(1):1-8.
  2. 문상은. 전신조정술. 서울. 정담미디어. 30-83. 2004
  3. 이성은. 발목관절 가동범위 증진 프로그램이 노인의 보행과 균형능력 향상에 미치는 효과. 한국전문물리치료학회지. 2005;12(2):28-36.
  4. 이재학, 함용운, 장수경. 측정 및 평가. 서울, 대학서림. 111-112. 1998
  5. 최현임. 척추측만증과 족부의 관련성 연구. 대구대학교 재활과학대학원 석사학위논문. 2011;18-19.
  6. 황윤태, 유경태, 이미영 등. 스트레칭운동에서 온열요법 이 요부의 유연성에 미치는 영향. 재활과학연구. 2007;25(1):103-114.
  7. 형인혁, 김형수, 이건철. 회내발에 대한 관절 가동술과 능동운동이 근활성도와 동적균형 능력에 미치는 영향. 한국사회체육학회지. 2009;37(2): 1023-1032.
  8. Bolz S, Davies GJ. Leg length differences and correlation with total leg strength. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1982;3(3):105-107. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1982.3.3.105
  9. Brantingham JW, Gilbert JL, Shaik J. Sagittal plane blockage of the foot, ankle and hallux and foot alignment-prevalence and association with low back pain. J. Chiropr Med. 2006;5(4): 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60144-X
  10. Brown M, Sinacore DR, Host HH. The relationship of strength to function in the older adult. J. Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50,55-59.
  11. Cailliet R. Low Back Pain Syndrome. Philadelphia, FA Davis Co. 147-184. 1998.
  12. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, et al. An international comparison of back surgery rates. Spine. 1994;19(11):1201-1206 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199405310-00001
  13. DeLome TL. Heavy resistance exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1946;27:607
  14. Fordyce WE, Brockway JA, Bergman JA. Acute back pain: A control group comparison of behavioral vs traditional management methods. J Behav Med. 1986;9(2):127-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848473
  15. Hamill J, Knutzen KM. Biomechanical basis of human movement. Lippincott Wilson & Wilkins, 1965.
  16. Horak FB. Clinical measurement of postural control in adults. Phys Ther. 1987;67(12):1881-1885 https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.12.1881
  17. Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic Exercise. 4th Ed. Philadelphia : FA Davis, 2002.
  18. Lattanza L, Gray GW, Kantner RM. Closed versus open Kinematic chain measurement of subtalar joint eversion. Implications for clinical practice. J orthop sports Phys Ther. 1998;9(9):310-314
  19. Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical therapy, 3rd ed, WB saunders. 1997.
  20. Munteanu E, Bassed D. Effect of foot posture and inverted foot orthoses on hallux dorsiflexion. JAPMA. 2006;96(1):32-37.
  21. Norkin CC, Levangie PK. Joint structure and function: A comprehensive analysis. 2nd ed, F. A. Davis Co. 1992.
  22. Paul RL. The primary respiratory mechanism beyond the craniospinal axis. American Academy Ostheopathy J. 2001;(1):24-34
  23. Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH. Normal and abnormal function of the foot, clinical biomechanics. Los Angeles. clinical biomechanics co. 1997.
  24. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Vertcal or Horizontal visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979;38(6): 560. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.38.6.560
  25. Tiberio D. The effect of excessive subtalar joint pronation on patellofemoral mechanics, A theoretical model. J Orhtop Sports Phys Ther. 1987;9(4):160-165. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1987.9.4.160
  26. Tropp H, Odenrick P. Postural control in single-limb stance. J Orthop Res. 1998;6(6):833-839. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100060607
  27. Valmassy RL. Clinical Biomechanics of the Lower Extremities. St-Louis: Mosby. 1998.
  28. Wheeler AH. Diagnosis and management of low back pain and sciatica. Am Fam Physician. 1996;52(5):1333-1341.
  29. Wright DG, Desai SM, Henderson WH. Action of the subtalar and ankle joint complex during the stance phase of walking. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;(46):361-362.