References
- B. Chanaron, C. Ahnert, N. Crouzet, V. Sanchez, N. Kolev, O. Marchand, S. Kliem, A. Papukchiev, Advanced multi-physics simulation for reactor safety in the framework of the NURESAFE project, Ann. Nucl. Energy 84 (2015).
- U. Rohde, The reactor dynamics code DYN3D-models, validation and applications, Prog. Nucl. Energy 89 (2016).
- U. Grundmann, F. Hollstein, A two-dimensional intranodal flux expansion method for hexagonal geometry, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 133 (1999).
- C. Beckert, U. Grundmann, Development and verification of a nodal approach for solving the multigroup SP3 equations, Ann. Nucl. Energy 35 (2008).
- S. Duerigen, E. Fridman, The simplified P3 approach on a trigonal geometry of the nodal reactor code DYN3D, Kerntechnik 77 (2012) 226-229. https://doi.org/10.3139/124.110247
- A. Gomez-torres, V. Sanchez-espinoza, S. Kliem, A. Gommlich, Implementation of a fast running full core pin power reconstruction method in DYN3D, Nucl. Eng. Des. 274 (2014).
- U. Grundmann, S. Kliem, Analyses of the OECD main steam line break benchmark with the DYN3D and ATHLET codes, Nucl. Technol. 142 (2003).
- U. Grundmann, S. Kliem, U. Rohde, Analysis of the boiling water reactor turbine trip benchmark with the codes DYN3D and ATHLET/DYN3D, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 148 (2004).
- M. Avramova, COBRA-TF Development, Qualification, and Application to Light Water Reactor Analysis, Tech. rep., The Pennsylvania State University, 2003.
- R. Salko, M. Avramova, CTF Pre-processor User's Manual, Tech. rep., The North Carolina State University, 2016.
- R. Salko, T. Blyth, C. Dances, J. Magedanz, C. Jernigan, J. Kelly, A. Toptan, M. Gergar, C. Gosdin, M. Avramova, S. Palmtag, J. Gehin, CTF Validation and Verification, Tech. rep., The North Carolina State University, 2016.
- R. Salko, A. Wysocki, M. Avramova, A. Toptan, N. Porter, T. Blyth, C. Dances, A. Gomez, C. Jernigan, J. Kelly, CTF Theory Manual, Tech. rep., The North Carolina State University, 2016.
- R. Salko, et al., CTF Parallel Performance Improvements," in "Proceedings of 2016 ANSWinter Meeting and Nuclear Technology Expo, Las Vegas, USA, 2016.
- C. Chauliac, J.-M. Aragones, D. Bestion, D. Cacuci, N. Crouzet, F.-P. Weiss, M. Zimmermann, NURESIM aAS A European simulation platform for nuclear reactor safety: multi-scale and multi-physics calculations, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, Nucl. Eng. Des. 241 (2011).
- A. Grahn, et al., Coupling of the 3D neutron kinetic core model DYN3D with the CFD software TRIO-U and simulation of a MSLB scenario, Nucl. Eng. Des. 315 (2017).
- S. Kliem, Y. Kozmenkov, J. Hadek, Y. Perin, F. Fouquet, F. Bernard, A. Sargeni, D. Cuervo, A. Sabater, S. Sanchez-cervera, N. Garcia-herranz, O. Zerkak, H. Ferroukhi, P. Mala, Testing the NURESIM platform on a PWR main steam line break benchmark, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2017). In press (available online).
- Y. Perin, J. Jimenez, Application of the best-estimate plus uncertainty approach on a BWR ATWS transient using the NURESIM European code platform, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2017). In press (available online).
- T. Kozlowski, T. Downar, OECD/NEA and U.S. NRC PWR MOX/UO2 Core Transient Benchmark, Final Specifications, Tech. rep., OECD/NEA, 2003.
- R. Sanchez, APOLLO 2: a user oriented, portable modular code for multi-group transport assembly calculations, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 100 (1988).
Cited by
- COUPLED TRANSIENT ANALYSIS OF A CORE WITH FUEL ASSEMBLY BOWING WITH A HYBRID CTF/DYN3D MODEL vol.247, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124706036