DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A lumped parameter method of characteristics approach and multigroup kernels applied to the subgroup self-shielding calculation in MPACT

  • 투고 : 2017.06.05
  • 심사 : 2017.07.07
  • 발행 : 2017.09.25

초록

An essential component of the neutron transport solver is the resonance self-shielding calculation used to determine equivalence cross sections. The neutron transport code, MPACT, is currently using the subgroup self-shielding method, in which the method of characteristics (MOC) is used to solve purely absorbing fixed-source problems. Recent efforts incorporating multigroup kernels to the MOC solvers in MPACT have reduced runtime by roughly $2{\times}$. Applying the same concepts for self-shielding and developing a novel lumped parameter approach to MOC, substantial improvements have also been made to the self-shielding computational efficiency without sacrificing any accuracy. These new multigroup and lumped parameter capabilities have been demonstrated on two test cases: (1) a single lattice with quarter symmetry known as VERA (Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications) Progression Problem 2a and (2) a two-dimensional quarter-core slice known as Problem 5a-2D. From these cases, self-shielding computational time was reduced by roughly $3-4{\times}$, with a corresponding 15-20% increase in overall memory burden. An azimuthal angle sensitivity study also shows that only half as many angles are needed, yielding an additional speedup of $2{\times}$. In total, the improvements yield roughly a $7-8{\times}$ speedup. Given these performance benefits, these approaches have been adopted as the default in MPACT.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) [Internet], 2015. Available from: http://www.casl.gov/.
  2. J. Turner, K. Clarno, M. Sieger, R. Bartlett, B. Collins, R. Pawlowski, R. Schmidt, R. Summers, The Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA): design and architecture, J. Comput. Phys. 326 (2016) 544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.003
  3. MPACT Team, MPACT Theory Manual, Version 2.0.0, Tech. Rep. CASL-U-2015-0078-000, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2015.
  4. H. Joo, J.Y. Cho, K.S. Kim, C.C. Lee, S.Q. Zee, Methods and performance of a three-dimensional whole-core transport code DeCART, in: Proc. PHYSOR 2004, American Nuclear Society, Chicago, IL, 2004.
  5. B. Collins, S. Stimpson, B. Kelley, M. Young, B. Kochunas, E. Larsen, T. Downar, A. Godfrey, Stability and accuracy of 3D neutron transport simulations using the 2D/1D method in MPACT, J. Computat. Phys. 326 (2016) 612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.022
  6. S. Stimpson, B. Collins, T. Downar, Axial transport solvers for the 2D/1D scheme in MPACT, in: Proc. PHYSOR 2014, Kyoto, Japan, 2014.
  7. B. Collins, S. Hamilton, S. Stimpson, Use of generalized Davidson eigenvalue solver for coarse mesh finite difference acceleration, in: Proc. M&C 2017, Jeju, Korea, April 16-20, 2017.
  8. S. Stimpson, Y. Liu, B. Collins, K. Clarno, A multigroup, lumped parameter MOC method for subgroup self-shielding in MPACT, in: Proc. M&C 2017, Jeju, Korea, April 16-20, 2017.
  9. S. Stimpson, B. Collins, B. Kochunas, Improvement of transport-corrected scattering stability and performance using a Jacobi inscatter algorithm for 2D-MOC, Ann. Nucl. Energy 105 (2017) 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.02.024
  10. Y. Liu, S. Stimpson, K.S. Kim, B. Collins, B. Kochunas, Performance improvements to the cross section calculation in MPACT, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 115 (2016) 539-542.
  11. B. Kochunas, S. Stimpson, Y. Liu, B. Yee, A. Zhu, A. Graham, B. Collins, K.S. Kim, et al., MPACT Performance Improvement in VERA-CS, CASL-U-2016-1115-000, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, June 30, 2016.
  12. B. Collins, S. Hamilton, M. Jarrett, K.S. Kim, B. Kochunas, Y. Liu, S. Palmtag, R. Salko, S. Stimpson, Summary of VERA Core Simulator Performance Improvements, CASL-U-2016-1171-000, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, August 31, 2016.
  13. R.J. Stammler, HELIOS Methods & HELIOS Documentation Rev. No. 7, Studsvik Scandpower, Waltham, MA, 2005.
  14. S. Stimpson, B. Collins, B. Kochunas, MOC Efficiency Improvements Using a Jacobi Inscatter Approximation, CASL-I-2016-1056-001, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2016.
  15. W. Boyd, S. Shaner, L. Li, B. Forget, K. Smith, The OpenMOC method of characteristics neutral particle transport code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 68 (2014) 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.12.012
  16. A. Godfrey, VERA Core Physics Benchmark Progression Problem Specifications (Rev. 4), Tech. Rep. CASL-U-2012-0131-004, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2014.
  17. H.G. Joo, J.Y. Choo, K.S. Kim, C.C. Lee, S.Q. Zee, Methods and performance of a three-dimensional whole-core transport code DeCART, in: Proc. PHYSOR 2004, Chicago, IL, April 25-29, 2004.
  18. J. Askew, A Characteristics Formulation of the Neutron Transport Equation in Complicated Geometries, AEEW-R-1108, U.K. Atomic Energy Authority, Abingdon, UK, 1972.
  19. K. Smith, J. Rhodes, CASMO-4 characteristics methods for two-dimensional PWR and BWR core calculations, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 83 (2000) 294.
  20. C. Tang, S. Zhang, Development and verification of an MOC code employing assembly modular ray tracing and efficient acceleration techniques, Ann. Nucl. Energy 36 (2009) 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.06.007
  21. R. Ferrer, J. Rhodes, A linear source approximation scheme for the method of characteristics, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 182 (2016) 151-165. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-6
  22. D. Knott, A. Yammamoto, Lattice physics computations, in: D.G. Cacuci (Ed.), Handbook of Nuclear Engineering, Springer, New York, 2010.
  23. N. Sugimura, A. Yamamoto, Resonance treatment based on ultra-fine-group spectrum calculation in the AEGIS code, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 44 (2007) 958. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711335
  24. R. Goldstein, E.R. Cohen, Theory of resonance absorption of neutrons, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 13 (1962) 132. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-1
  25. Y. Liu, W.R. Martin, Assessment of homogeneous and heterogeneous resonance integral tables and their applications to the embedded self-shielding method, Ann. Nucl. Eng. 92 (2016) 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.01.045
  26. S. Stimpson, Y. Liu, B. Collins, K. Clarno, MPACT Subgroup Self Shielding Efficiency Improvements, CASL-U-2016-1063-001, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2016.
  27. K.S. Kim, M.L. Williams, D. Wiarda, A.T. Godfrey, Development of a new 47-group library for the CASL neutronics simulator, in: Proc. M&C 2015, Nashville, TN, April 19-23, 2015.
  28. Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, Introducing TitandThe World's #1 Open Science Supercomputer [Internet], 2014. Available from: http://www.olcf.ornl.gov/titan/.

피인용 문헌

  1. MULTILEVEL CMFD ACCELERATION METHODS FOR WHOLE CORE REACTOR SIMULATION IN VERA vol.247, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124702037
  2. Extended Applications of Subgrid Representation in the 2D/1D Method vol.195, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1871994
  3. Multilevel-in-Space-and-Energy CMFD in VERA vol.195, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1877503