DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ROSA/LSTF Test and RELAP5 Analyses on PWR Cold Leg Small-Break LOCA with Accident Management Measure and PKL Counterpart Test

  • Takeda, Takeshi (Nuclear Safety Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency) ;
  • Ohtsu, Iwao (Nuclear Safety Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.07
  • 심사 : 2017.03.10
  • 발행 : 2017.08.25

초록

An experiment using the $Prim{\ddot{a}}rkreisl{\ddot{a}}ufe$ Versuchsanlage (PKL) was performed for the OECD/NEA PKL-3 Project as a counterpart to a previous test with the large-scale test facility (LSTF) on a cold leg smallbreak loss-of-coolant accident with an accident management (AM) measure in a pressurized water reactor. Concerning the AM measure, the rate of steam generator (SG) secondary-side depressurization was controlled to achieve a primary depressurization rate of 200 K/h as a common test condition; however, the onset timings of the SG depressurization were different from each other. In both tests, rapid recovery started in the core collapsed liquid level after loop seal clearing, which caused whole core quench. Some discrepancies appeared between the LSTF and PKL test results for the core collapsed liquid level, the cladding surface temperature, and the primary pressure. The RELAP5/MOD3.3 code predicted the overall trends of the major thermal-hydraulic responses observed in the LSTF test well, and indicated a remaining problem in the prediction of primary coolant distribution. Results of uncertainty analysis for the LSTF test clarified the influences of the combination of multiple uncertain parameters on peak cladding temperature within the defined uncertain ranges.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. F. Mascari, H. Nakamura, K. Umminger, F. De Rosa, F. D'Auria, Scaling issues for the experimental characterization of reactor coolant system in integral test facilities and role of system code as extrapolation tool, in: Proceedings of the 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-16), Chicago, IL, American Nuclear Society (ANS), IL, USA, 2015.
  2. The ROSA-V Group, ROSA-V Large Scale Test Facility (LSTF) System Description for the Third and Fourth Simulated Fuel Assemblies, JAERI-Tech 2003-037, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan, 2003.
  3. K. Umminger, L. Dennhardt, S. Schollenberger, B. Schoen, Integral test facility PKL: experimental PWR accident investigation, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations 2012 (2012) 1-16.
  4. H. Nakamura, T. Takeda, A. Satou, M. Ishigaki, S. Abe, D. Irwanto, Major outcomes from OECD/NEA ROSA and ROSA-2 Projects, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-15), Pisa, Italy, American Nuclear Society (ANS), IL, USA, 2013.
  5. K. Umminger, L. Dennhardt, B. Schoen, S. Schollenberger, Overview on test results from the OECD/NEA PKL 2 Project, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-15), Pisa, Italy, American Nuclear Society (ANS), IL, USA, 2013.
  6. T. Takeda, I. Ohtsu, H. Nakamura, LSTF test on CET performance during PWR hot leg small-break LOCA and RELAP5 analysis, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-15), Pisa, Italy, American Nuclear Society (ANS), IL, USA, 2013.
  7. K. Umminger, B. Schoen, S. Schollenberger, Conclusions on boron precipitation following a large break loss of coolant accident, in: Proceedings of the 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-16), Chicago, IL, American Nuclear Society (ANS), IL, USA, 2015.
  8. T. Takeda, RELAP5 analyses of ROSA/LSTF experiments on AM measures during PWR vessel bottom small-break LOCAs with gas inflow, Int. J. Nucl. Energy 2014 (2014) 1-17.
  9. USNRC Nuclear Safety Analysis Division, RELAP5/MOD3.3 CodeManual, NUREG/CR-5535/Rev 1, Information Systems Laboratories, Inc., San Diego, CA, 2001.
  10. G.E. Wilson, B.E. Boyack, The role of the PIRT process in experiments, code development and code applications associated with reactor safety analysis, Nucl. Eng. Des. 186 (1998) 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(98)00216-7
  11. N. Zuber, Problems in Modeling Small Break LOCA, USNRC Report NUREG-0724, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1980.
  12. H. Kumamaru, K. Tasaka, Recalculation of Simulated Post-scram Core Power Decay Curve for Use in ROSA-IV/LSTF Experiments on PWR Small-break LOCAs and Transients, JAERI-M 90-142, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan, 1990.
  13. H. Asaka, Y. Kukita, T. Yonomoto, Y. Koizumi, K. Tasaka, Results of 0.5% coldleg small-break LOCA experiments at ROSA-IV/LSTF: effect of break orientation, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 3 (1990) 588-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(90)90075-I
  14. H.K. Fauske, The discharge of saturated water through tubes, AlChE Symp. Ser. 61 (1965) 210-216.
  15. K.H. Ardron, R.A. Furness, A study of the critical flow models used in reactor blowdown analysis, Nucl. Eng. Des. 39 (1976) 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(76)90074-1
  16. D.W. Sallet, Thermal hydraulics of valves for nuclear applications, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 88 (1984) 220-244. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE84-A18579
  17. Susyadi, T. Yonomoto, Analysis on Non Uniform Flow in Steam Generator during Steady State Natural Circulation Cooling, JAERI-Research 2005-011, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan, 2005.
  18. T. Takeda, H. Asaka, H. Nakamura, RELAP5 analysis of OECD/NEA ROSA Project experiment simulating a PWR loss-of-feedwater transient with high-power natural circulation, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations 2012 (2012) 1-15.
  19. B.E. Boyack, L.W. Ward, Validation test matrix for the consolidated TRAC (TRAC-M) code, in: Proceedings of International Meeting on Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installation Safety Analysis (BE '00), Washington, DC, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM, USA, 2000.
  20. M.J. Griffiths, J.P. Schlegel, T. Hibiki, M. Ishii, I. Kinoshita, Y. Yoshida, Phenomena identification and ranking table for thermal-hydraulic phenomena during a small-break LOCA with loss of high pressure injection, Prog. Nucl. Energy 73 (2014) 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.01.008
  21. M. Ishii, K. Mishima, Study of Two-fluid Model and Interfacial Area, NUREG/CR-1873, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 1980.
  22. H. Kumamaru, Y. Kukita, H. Asaka, M. Wang, E. Ohtani, RELAP5/MOD3 code analyses of LSTF experiments on intentional primary-side depressurization following SBLOCAs with totally failed HPI, Nucl. Technol. 126 (1999) 331-339. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT99-A2978
  23. F.W. Dittus, L.M.K. Boelter, Heat transfer in automobile radiators of the tubular type, Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer 12 (1985) 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1933(85)90003-X
  24. J.R. Sellars, M. Tribus, J.S. Klein, Heat transfer to laminar flows in a round tube or flat conduit: the Graetz problem extended, Trans. ASME 78 (1956) 441-448.
  25. S.W. Churchill, H.H.S. Chu, Correlating equations for laminar and turbulent free convection from a vertical plate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 18 (1975) 1323-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(75)90243-4
  26. H. Glaeser, GRS method for uncertainty and sensitivity evaluation of code results and applications, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations 2008 (2008) 1-7.
  27. W.W. Daniel, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, in: Applied Nonparametric Statistics, second ed., PWS-Kent Publishing, Boston, MA, 1990.