DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Alveolar ridge preservation with an open-healing approach using single-layer or double-layer coverage with collagen membranes

  • Choi, Ho-Keun (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Hag-Yeon (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, In-Woo (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Shin, Hyun-Seung (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Koo, Ki-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Chang (Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich) ;
  • Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2017.11.22
  • 심사 : 2017.12.19
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31

초록

Purpose: The aim of this prospective pilot study was to compare alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with open-healing approach using a single-layer and a double-layer coverage with collagen membranes using radiographic and clinical analyses. Methods: Eleven molars from 9 healthy patients requiring extraction of the maxillary or mandibular posterior teeth were included and allocated into 2 groups. After tooth extraction, deproteinized bovine bone mineral mixed with 10% collagen was grafted into the socket and covered either with a double-layer of resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membranes (DL group, n=6) or with a single-layer (SL group, n=5). Primary closure was not obtained. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken immediately after the ARP procedure and after a healing period of 4 months before implant placement. Radiographic measurements were made of the width and height changes of the alveolar ridge. Results: All sites healed without any complications, and dental implants were placed at all operated sites with acceptable initial stability. The measurements showed that the reductions in width at the level 1 mm apical from the alveolar crest (including the bone graft) were $-1.7{\pm}0.5mm$ in the SL group and $-1.8{\pm}0.4mm$ in the DL group, and the horizontal changes in the other areas were also similar in the DL and SL groups. The reductions in height were also comparable between groups. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, single-layer and double-layer coverage with collagen membranes after ARP failed to show substantial differences in the preservation of horizontal or vertical dimensions or in clinical healing. Thus, both approaches seem to be suitable for open-healing ridge preservation procedures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  2. Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:266-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90069-2
  3. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:313-23.
  4. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
  5. Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:1-21.
  6. Kentros GA, Filler SJ, Rothstein SS. Six month evaluation of particulate Durapatite in extraction sockets for the preservation of the alveolar ridge. Implantologist 1985;3:53-62.
  7. Cohen ES. Ridge enhancement and socket preservation utilizing the subepithelial connective tissue graft: a case report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:53-8.
  8. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. The application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral for ridge preservation prior to implantation. Clinical and histological observations in a case report. J Periodontol 1998;69:1062-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1062
  9. Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: a clinical and histologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:469-77.
  10. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:545-9.
  11. Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P. Long-term stability of soft tissues following alveolar ridge preservation: 10-year results of a prospective study around nonsubmerged implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:795-804. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2133
  12. Mardas N, Chadha V, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:688-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x
  13. Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, Stark PC, Griffin T. Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a comparative clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011;82:377-87. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.090342
  14. Pellegrini G, Rasperini G, Obot G, Farronato D, Dellavia C. Soft tissue healing in alveolar socket preservation technique: histologic evaluations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:531-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1857
  15. Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Derchi G, Covani U. Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2014;85:14-23. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120711
  16. Park JC, Koo KT, Lim HC. The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46:415-25. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.415
  17. Cho IW, Park JC, Shin HS. A comparison of different compressive forces on graft materials during alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47:51-63. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.51
  18. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
  19. von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x
  20. Kim SH, Kim DY, Kim KH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Lee YM. The efficacy of a double-layer collagen membrane technique for overlaying block grafts in a rabbit calvarium model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1124-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01744.x
  21. Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:844-52.

피인용 문헌

  1. 발치와 치조제 보존술 시행 후 식립한 임플란트의 방사선학적 및 임상적 후향적 연구 vol.34, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.3.167
  2. Alveolar Ridge Preservation of Maxillary Molars for Implant Placement Without Sinus Lift Surgery: Case series vol.22, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180018
  3. Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open‐healing approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial vol.46, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13184
  4. Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Sphere Graft Combined with a Double-Layer Non-Crosslinked Collagen Membrane Technique for Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Animal Study vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010018
  5. Late implant placement following ridge preservation versus early implant placement: A pilot randomized clinical trial for periodontally compromised non‐molar extraction sites vol.47, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13223
  6. Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review vol.13, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030786
  7. Histological comparison of different compressive forces on particulate grafts during alveolar ridge preservation: a prospective proof-of-concept study vol.50, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.3.197
  8. Open healing of contained and non-contained extraction sockets covered with a ribose cross-linked collagen membrane: a pilot study vol.50, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2000400020
  9. Radiographic and Histologic Analysis 1-2 Years after Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Maxillary Premolar and Molar: A Case Report vol.11, pp.14, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146591
  10. 발치와 치조제 보존술 후 식립한 임플란트 주위 골 변화: 후향적 방사선학적 분석 vol.59, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.3.281
  11. Short-term use of an exposed polypropylene barrier in the preservation of alveolar bone after extraction: randomized clinical trial vol.50, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.005
  12. A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites vol.11, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81402-5