DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bone-level implants placed in the anterior maxilla: an open-label, single-arm observational study

  • Gao, EnFeng (Department of Stomatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital) ;
  • Hei, Wei-Hong (Key Laboratory for Oral Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University School and Hospital of Stomatology) ;
  • Park, Jong-Chul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Pang, KangMi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Sun Kyung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinical Trial Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Bongju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinical Trial Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Soung-Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2017.07.10
  • Accepted : 2017.09.18
  • Published : 2017.10.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed marginal bone remodeling and soft tissue esthetics after the loading of single bone-level implants in the anterior maxilla. Methods: An open, single-arm observational clinical trial with 3 years of follow-up was performed, including 22 implants. The patients presented with a single tooth gap in the anterior maxilla (tooth positions 14-24), with natural or restored adjacent teeth. An implant was placed at least 8 weeks post-extraction and healed submerged for 6 weeks. After the second-stage operation, a fixed provisional prosthesis was provided. The final restoration was placed 6 months after the provisional restoration. The time of the provisional crown connection was considered to be the baseline in this study. Esthetic parameters and the marginal bone level were assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Results: All implants were well integrated in the bone. A statistically significant increase was found in the mean implant stability quotient between the time of the provisional prosthesis and the time of the final prosthesis. Most implants (95.5%) revealed marginal bone resorption (<0.5 mm), and just 1 implant (4.5%) showed a change of 2.12 mm from baseline to 36 months (mean $0.07{\pm}0.48mm$), while the crestal bone level decreased significantly, from $2.34{\pm}0.93mm$ at baseline to $1.70{\pm}1.10mm$ at 36 months. The facial gingival margin and papilla were stable and the esthetic scores indicated high patient and dentist satisfaction. Conclusions: Platform-switching bone-level implants placed in maxillary single-tooth gaps resulted in successful osseointegration with minimal marginal bone resorption. The peri-implant soft tissue was also esthetically satisfying and stable.

Keywords

References

  1. Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant-supported restorations in the anterior region: prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;8:875-83.
  2. Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of esthetics. Chicago (IL): Quintessence; 1990.
  3. Buser D, von Arx T. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 Suppl 1:83-100.
  4. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  5. Weber HP, Buser D, Fiorellini JP, Williams RC. Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels adjacent to nonsubmerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:181-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030405.x
  6. Bragger U, Hafeli U, Huber B, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:218-24. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090402.x
  7. Pham AN, Fiorellini JP, Paquette D, Williams RC, Weber HP. Longitudinal radiographic study of crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1994;20:26-34.
  8. Ricci G, Aimetti M, Stablum W, Guasti A. Crestal bone resorption 5 years after implant loading: clinical and radiologic results with a 2-stage implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:597-602.
  9. Hartman GA, Cochran DL. Initial implant position determines the magnitude of crestal bone remodeling. J Periodontol 2004;75:572-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.572
  10. Belser UC, Buser D, Hess D, Schmid B, Bernard JP, Lang NP. Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patients--a critical appraisal. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:132-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00131.x
  11. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1987.tb00298.x
  12. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
  13. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01209.x
  14. Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol 2009;80:140-51. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435
  15. Jung RE, Jones AA, Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG, Schoolfield J, Buser D, et al. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs. J Periodontol 2008;79:260-70. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070132
  16. Biancu S, Ericsson I, Lindhe J. The periodontal ligament of teeth connected to osseointegrated implants. An experimental study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:362-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00162.x
  17. Besimo CE, Guindy JS, Lewetag D, Meyer J. Prevention of bacterial leakage into and from prefabricated screw-retained crowns on implants in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:654-60.
  18. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Branemark System implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130103.x
  19. Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom JL. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:165-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01210.x
  20. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300704
  21. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:78-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01008.x
  22. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00520.x
  23. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
  24. Hurzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:33-9.
  25. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:577-81.
  26. Buser D, Chappuis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Buser R, et al. Long-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation. J Dent Res 2013;92:176S-182S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504949
  27. Buser D, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Grutter L, Schmid B, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up. J Periodontol 2008;79:1773-81. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080071
  28. Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grutter L, Chappuis V, et al. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol 2009;80:152-62. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080360
  29. Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Sanz M, Chen S, Martin WC, Jackowski J, et al. Submerged and transmucosal healing yield the same clinical outcomes with two-piece implants in the anterior maxilla and mandible: interim 1-year results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:211-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02210.x
  30. Santing HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Meijer HJ. Performance of the Straumann Bone Level Implant system for anterior single-tooth replacements in augmented and nonaugmented sites: a prospective cohort study with 60 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:941-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02486.x
  31. Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O, Rattanamongkolgul S. Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:662-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01887.x
  32. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Soft tissue management at implant sites. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:163-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01266.x
  33. Choquet V, Hermans M, Adriaenssens P, Daelemans P, Tarnow DP, Malevez C. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region. J Periodontol 2001;72:1364-71. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1364
  34. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone: a report of six consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:249-59.
  35. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, Froum S, Magner A, Cho SC, et al. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol 2003;74:1785-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785
  36. Lops D, Chiapasco M, Rossi A, Bressan E, Romeo E. Incidence of inter-proximal papilla between a tooth and an adjacent immediate implant placed into a fresh extraction socket: 1-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1135-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01580.x
  37. Kourkouta S, Dedi KD, Paquette DW, Mol A. Interproximal tissue dimensions in relation to adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla: clinical observations and patient aesthetic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1375-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01761.x
  38. Sorni-Broker M, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Diago M. Factors that influence the position of the peri-implant soft tissues: a review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:e475-9.
  39. Lai HC, Zhang ZY, Wang F, Zhuang LF, Liu X, Pu YP. Evaluation of soft-tissue alteration around implant-supported single-tooth restoration in the anterior maxilla: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:560-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01522.x

Cited by

  1. Performance of bone‐level implants with conical connections in the anterior maxilla: A 5‐year prospective cohort study vol.31, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13553
  2. Bone loss-related factors in tissue and bone level dental implants: a systematic review of clinical trials vol.47, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.3.153