DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors affecting the development of consumer-brand relationships - The role of parasocial interaction -

SNS 브랜드 페이지에서 소비자-브랜드 관계 형성에 미치는 영향 요인 분석 - 준사회적 상호작용 역할을 중심으로 -

  • Park, Jee-Sun (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Incheon National University) ;
  • Ha, Sejin (Dept. of Retail Hospitality and Tourism Management, The University of Tennessee)
  • Received : 2016.11.30
  • Accepted : 2016.12.31
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

The rapid growth in the popularity of social media sites has meant that social media has become an important communication channel for brands. Brands create brand pages on social media to cultivate positive and strong relationships with consumers. This study seeks to enhance our understanding of how fashion brand pages in social media foster consumer-brand relationships by exploring the factors that affect the development of consumer-brand relationships. Drawing on the parasocial interaction theory, this study proposes parasocial interaction as a key factor of this process. Specifically, this study proposes four antecedents (vividness, interactivity, social presence, and focused attention) of consumers' parasocial interaction with brand pages, which further affects consumer responses in terms of affective engagement and brand loyalty. An online survey was administered with consumers who have followed and visited at least one fashion brand page via a social networking site (SNS). Structural equation modeling revealed that consumers' perceptions of vividness, interactivity, social presence, and focused attention on a fashion brand page positively affected their feelings towards parasocial interaction with the brand page, which in turn led to their affective engagement with the brand page and consequent brand loyalty. These findings suggest that consumers build relationships of varying degrees with brand pages in a similar manner to that with people, which leads to their development of a positive relationship with the brand. This study concludes with discussions and practical implications.

Keywords

References

  1. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356. doi:10.2307/3151897
  2. Auter, P. J. (1992). Psychometric: TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36(2), 173-181. doi:10.1080/08838159209364165
  3. Ballantine, P. W., & Martin, B. A. S. (2005). Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 197-201.
  4. Biocca, F., & Delaney, B. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 57-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Bowden, J. (2009a). Customer engagement: A framework for assessing customer-brand relationships: The case of the restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(6), 574-596. doi:10.1080/19368620903024983
  6. Bowden, J. L.-H. (2009b). The process of customer engagement: A conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679170105
  7. Bracken, C. C., Pettey, G., & Wu, M. (2014). Revisiting the use of secondary task reaction time measures in telepresence research: Exploring the role of immersion and attention. AI & Society, 29(4), 533-538. doi:10.1007/s00146-013- 0494-7
  8. Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252-271. doi:10.1177/1094670511411703
  9. Calder, B. J., Malthouse, E. C., & Schaedel, U. (2009). An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 321-331. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.002
  10. Caru, A., & Cova, B. (2006). How to facilitate immersion in a consumption experience: Appropriation operations and service elements. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(1), 4-14. doi:10.1002/cb.30
  11. Chang, P.-L., & Chieng, M.-H. (2006). Building consumer-brand relationship: A cross‐cultural experiential view. Psychology & Marketing, 23(11), 927-959. doi:10.1002/mar.20140
  12. Choi, Y. K., Miracle, G. E., & Biocca, F. (2001). The effects of anthropomorphic agents on advertising effectiveness and the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(1), 19-32. doi:10.1080/15252019.2001.10722055
  13. Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65-77. doi:10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646
  14. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  15. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355-366. doi:10.2307/248682
  16. Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387-396. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00106-1
  17. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373. doi:10.1086/209515
  18. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2003). Managing user trust in B2C e-services. e-Service Journal, 2(2), 7-24. doi:10.2979/esj.2003.2.2.7
  19. Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279-305. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
  20. Goldstein, E. B. (2007). Sensation and perception (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  21. Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers' experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104-1121. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
  22. Hennig-Thurau, T., Malthouse, E. C., Friege, C., Gensler, S., Lobschat, L., Rangaswamy, A., & Skiera, B. (2010). The impact of new media on customer relationships. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 311-330. doi:10.1177/1094670510375460
  23. Hoerner, J. (1999). Scaling the web: A parasocial interaction scale for world wide web sites. In D. W. Schumann & E. Thorson (Eds.), Advertising and the world wide web (pp. 135-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149-165. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002
  25. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  26. Huang, L.-T. (2016). Flow and social capital theory in online impulse buying. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2277-2283. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.042
  27. Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1997). Resourceadvantage theory: A snake swallowing its tail or a general theory of competition?. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 74-82. doi:10.2307/1252088
  28. Jin, S.-A. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with an avatar in second life: A typology of the self and an empirical test of the mediating role of social presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19(4), 331-340. doi:10.1162/PRES_a_00001
  29. Johnson, A. & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Attention: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  30. Jung, J. M., Hui, H. C., Min, K. S., & Martin, D. (2014). Does telic/paratelic user mode matter on the effectiveness of interactive internet advertising? A reversal theory perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1303-1309. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.002
  31. Kalehoff, M. (2013, July 2). People 'fan' brands because they actually like them. MediaPost, Retrieved April 26, 2016, from http://www.mediapost.com/publi cations/article/203748/people-fan-brands-becausethey-actually-like-the.html#axzz2Xu09Zi45
  32. Kim, S.-J., & Chung, M.-S. (2008). The effect of consumer-brand relationship of fashion luxury product on brand loyalty. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 16(6), 1076-1086. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2008.16.6.1076
  33. Koenig, F., & Lessan, G. (1985). Viewers' relationship to television personalities. Psychological Reports, 57(1), 263-266. doi:10.2466/pr0.1985.57.1.263
  34. Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer-brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134-148. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
  35. Lang, A. (1990). Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features and emotional content in TV commercials. Communication Research, 17(3), 275-299. doi:10.1177/009365090017003001
  36. Laroche, M., Habibi, M. R., & Richard, M.-O. (2013). To be or not to be in social media: How brand loyalty is affected by social media?. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 76-82. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.003
  37. Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S.-A., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 754-772. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x
  38. Lee, Y., & Cho, N. H. (2014). The relationship of the characteristics of fashion brand SNS, relationship quality and purchase intention: Focusing on Facebook. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 22(5), 834-847. doi:10.7741/rjcc.2014.22.5.834
  39. Levy, M. R. (1979). Watching TV news as para-social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 23(1), 69-80. doi:10.1080/08838157909363919
  40. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), 0-0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
  41. McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koening, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38-54. doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.1.38.18451
  42. McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29-42. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002. 10673674
  43. Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2013). Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement on social networking sites in China. Public Relations Review, 39(1), 13-22. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.09.013
  44. Mollen, A., & Wilson, H. (2010). Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(9/10), 919-925. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014
  45. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153
  46. Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-42. doi:10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184
  47. Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty?. Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-44. doi:10.2307/1252099
  48. Park, M. (2008). The role of interactivity in online shopping environments. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 16(1), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2008.16.1.145
  49. Perse, E. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59-77. doi:10.1177/009365089016001003
  50. Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 442-452. doi:10.1086/497556
  51. Piyathasanan, B., Mathies, C., Wetzels, M., Patterson, P. G., & de Ruyter, K. (2015). A hierarchical model of virtual experience and its influences on the perceived value and loyalty of customers. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19(2), 126-158.
  52. Powell, L., Richmond, V. P., & Williams, G. C. (2011). Social networking and political campaigns: Perceptions of candidates as interpersonal constructs. North American Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 331-342.
  53. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, UK: CSLI Publications and Cambridge University Press.
  54. Rice, R. E. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(4), 475-500. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.4.475
  55. Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987a). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14(2), 246-268. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
  56. Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987b). Audience activity and television news gratifications. Communication Research, 14(1), 58-84. doi:10.1177/009365087014001004
  57. Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635-654. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7
  58. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
  59. Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential marketing: How to get customer to sense, feel, think, act, and relate to your company and brands. New York: The Free Press.
  60. Shen, K. N., & Khalifa, M. (2012). System design effects on online impulse buying. Internet Research, 22(4), 396-425. doi:10.1108/10662241211250962
  61. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: Wiley.
  62. Skumanich, S. A., & Kintsfather, D. P. (1998). Individual media dependency relations within television shopping programming: A causal model reviewed and revised. Communication Research, 25(2), 200-219. doi:10.1177/009365098025002004
  63. Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 99-113. doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.2.99
  64. Statista. (2016a). Number of social network users worldwide from 2010 to 2019 (in billions). Statista, Retrieved April 26, 2016, from http://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users
  65. Statista. (2016b). Statistics and facts about brands on social media. Statista, Retrieved March 28, 2016, from http://www.statista.com/topics/2057/brands-onsocial-media
  66. Stephens, D. L., Hill, R. P., & Bergman, K. (1996). Enhancing the consumer-product relationship: Lessons from the QVC home shopping channel. Journal of Business Research, 37(3), 193-200. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00069-0
  67. Stern, B. B., Russell, C. A., & Russell, D. W. (2007). Hidden persuasions in soap operas: Damaged heroines and negative consumer effects. International Journal of Advertising, 26(1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2007.11072994
  68. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
  69. Thorson, K. S., & Rodgers, S. (2006). Relationships between blogs as eWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 5-44. doi:10.1080/15252019.2006.10722117
  70. Tsiotsou, R. H. (2016). The social aspects of consumption as predictors of consumer loyalty: Online vs offline services. Journal of Service Management, 27(2), 91-116. doi:10.1108/JOSM-04-2015-0117
  71. Voorveld, H. A. M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2009) Consumers' responses to brand websites: An interdisciplinary review. Internet Research, 19(5), 535-565. doi:10.1108/10662240920998887
  72. Wang, H., Meng, Y., & Wang, W. (2013). The role of perceived interactivity in virtual communities: Building trust and increasing stickiness. Connection Science, 25(1), 55-73. doi:10.1080/09540091.2013.824407
  73. Wu, G., Hu, X., & Wu, Y. (2010). Effects of perceived interactivity, perceived web assurance and disposition to trust on initial online trust. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 1-26. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01528.x
  74. Yadav, M. S., & Varadarajan, R. (2005). Interactivity in the electronic marketplace: An exposition of the concept and implications for research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 585-603. doi:10.1177/0092070305278487

Cited by

  1. 뷰티 블로거에 대한 중국 소비자의 준사회적 상호작용이 동영상 태도와 제품 태도에 미치는 영향 vol.26, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2018.26.5.649