디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제15권1호
  • /
  • Pages.85-96
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기업수명주기와 경영자 보상

The Corporate Life Cycle and Management Compensation

  • 투고 : 2016.11.30
  • 심사 : 2017.01.20
  • 발행 : 2017.01.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 기업수명주기와 경영자 보상의 관계를 분석하는데 있다. 이를 위해 기업수명주기에 따른 경영자 보상 수준을 살펴보고, 수명주기별 경영자보상의 성과보상민감도를 살펴보고자 한다. 이와 같은 연구목적을 수행하기 위해, 2003년부터 2014년까지 유가증권시장 및 코스닥시장의 상장기업을 이용하여 회귀분석을 수행하였다. 분석 결과, 경영자의 보상수준은 도입기에서 가장 낮으며, 성숙기까지 증가하여 성숙기에서 가장 높으며, 쇠퇴기에서 급격하게 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 성숙기를 제외한 도입기, 성장기, 쇠퇴기에서 성과보상민감도는 회계성과보다 주가성과에 더 연동되는 것으로 나타났으며, 성숙기에서는 회계성과에 강력하게 연동되는 것으로 나타났다. 추가분석을 통해 성장률이 높은 집단에서 회계성과와 주가성과에 연동되는 것으로 나타나 수명주기 결과가 성장률에 의해 나타난 결과가 아님을 확인하였다. 대규모기업집단을 별도로 분석하여 수명주기별 성과보상민감도가 일반적인 결과와 확연하게 다르게 나타남을 확인하였다. 이러한 결과는 기업의 수명주기에 따라 경영자 보상이 영향을 받는 다는 결과를 나타낸다는 점에서 기존연구와 차별성을 갖으며 관련 연구에 보탬이 된다.

The purpose of this study investigates the relation between corporate life cycle and management compensation. The analysis is performed by comparing the compensation level and pay-performance-sensitivity (PPS) at each life cycle based on Korean data from 2003 to 2014. The results show that regarding compensation level, mature stage has the highest mean value of compensation and compensation level drops after mature stage. In introduction stage, growth and decline stages, compensation is not sensitive to accounting performance. In a while, in mature stage, management compensation varies with accounting performance more significantly than stock performance. In additional analysis, the results indicate that the finding is not designated from growth opportunities and the relation differs when the firm is included in a conglomerate. These findings contribute to the literature by providing additional evidence to understand for compensation and the corporate life cycle studies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wang, G., and P. Singh, "The evolution of CEO compensation over the organizational life cycle: A contingency explanation." Human Resource Management Review, Vol24, No.2, pp.144-159, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.11.001
  2. Anthony, J. H., and K. Ramesh, "Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis." Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol15, pp.203-227, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(92)90018-W
  3. Cameron, K. S., Kim, M. U., and Whetten, D. A. "Organizational effects of decline and turbulence." Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.32, pp.222-240, 1987. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393127
  4. Kazanjian, R. K., and Drazin, R. "An empirical test of a stage of growth progression mode" Management Science, Vol.35, pp.1489-1504, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1489
  5. Holmstrom, Bengt, "Moral Hazard and Observability", Bell Journal of Economics (Spring), pp.74-91, 1979.
  6. Drake, Katharine D. and Martin, Melissa, "Executive Compensation: A Firm Life Cycle Analysis", Working paper, 2015.
  7. Dickinson, V., "Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle." The Accounting Review, Vol.86, pp.1969-1994, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10130
  8. Boston Consulting Group, "Perspectives on experience." Boston, M,A, 1968.
  9. Black, L. E., "Life-cycle impacts on the incremental value-relevance of earnings and cash flow measures." Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, Vol.4, pp.40-56, 1998.
  10. Hribar, P. and N. Yehuda, "Life Cycle, Cost of Capital, Earnings Persistence and Stock Returns." Working Paper, Cornell University, 2007.
  11. J. M. Choi. "Managerial Ownership and Debt Choice", Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 11, no. 4, pp.177-188, 2013. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.11.177
  12. Y. M. Choi. "Manageral stock ownership and debt maturity", Journal of the Korea Convergence Society vo1. 6, no.1, pp.71-76, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.1.071
  13. Devers, C., Cannella, A., Reilly, G., and Yoder, M., "Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments." Journal of Management, Vol. 33, pp.1016-1072, 2007.
  14. Tosi, H. L., Werner, S., Katz, J. P., and Gomez-Mejia, L. R., "How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies." Journal of Management, Vol26, pp.301-339, 2000.
  15. D. I.. Kim. "Anaysis on chinese companies with introduction of the IFRS and the conservatism Freatures", Journal of Digital Convergence. vol. 14, no. 8, pp.105-113, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.8.105
  16. K. H. Kim and D. W. Yang., "A study on the effect of CEO ethics on the business performance of company: Focusing on construction companies", Journal of Digital Convergence. vol. 14, no. 4, pp.173-183, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.4.173
  17. Miller, D., and Friesen, P. H., "A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle." Management Science, Vol.30, pp.1161-1183, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161
  18. Madhani, P. M., "Optimal compensation: Rebalancing pay." SCMS Journal of Indian Management, Vol.9, pp.31-42, 2012.
  19. Salimath, M., Cullen, J., and Umesh, U., "Outsourcing and performance in entrepreneurial firms: Contingent relationships with entrepreneurial configurations." Decision Sciences, Vol.39, pp.359-381, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00196.x
  20. Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G., and Mohammad, E., "Are stock options grants to CEOs of stagnant firms fair and justified?" Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.90, pp.137-155, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0033-0
  21. Hirschey, M., and Pappas, J. L. "Regulatory and life cycle influences on managerial incentives." Southern Economic Journal, Vol.48, pp.327-334, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/1057933
  22. Y. Hwang and S. H. Park. "The evolution of alliance formation in biotech firms: An organisational life cycle framework." Management Dynamics, Vol.15, 40-53, 2006.
  23. Lester, D. L., Parnell, J. A., Crandall, W., and Menefee, M. "Organizational life cycle and innovation among entrepreneurial enterprises." Journal of Small Business Strategy, Vol.19, pp.37-49, 2008.
  24. Lynall, M., Golden, B., and Hillman, "A. Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multi-theoretic view." Academy of Management Review, Vol.28, pp.416-431, 2003. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196743
  25. Singh, P., and Agarwal, N. C., "Executive compensation: Examining an old issue from new perspectives." Compensation and Benefits Review, Vol.35, pp.48-54, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368703251169
  26. Smith, K. G., Mitchell, T. R., and Summer, C. E., "Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life cycle." Academy of Management Journal, Vol.28, pp.799-820, 1985. https://doi.org/10.2307/256238
  27. Smith, C. W., and R. L. Watts, "The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Financing Policies." Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.32, pp.262-292, 1992.
  28. Stephen, Cheong, and Woochan Kim, "Revisiting Executive Pay in Family-Controlled Firms: Family Premium in Large Business Groups," ECGI Working Paper No. 441., 2014.
  29. Jin Bae Kim, Gun Lee, Min Young Lee, "CEO transfer within business group and firm performance.."Working paper, 2013.
  30. Hyungseok Kim and Woochan Kim, "Executive compensation: When a firm is a business group member," ECGI Working paper, 2015.