DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact on AIS Process and Firm Performance of Accounting Information System Based on Dynamic Capabilities Framework

DCF에 근거한 회계정보시스템이 AIS프로세스와 기업성과에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Kyung Ihl (Dept.of Convergence Management, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • 김경일 (국립한국교통대학교 융합경영전공)
  • Received : 2017.08.30
  • Accepted : 2017.10.20
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

Accounting information systems (AIS) capture and process accounting data and provide valuable information for decision makers. However, in a rapidly changing environment, continual management of the AIS is necessary for organizations to optimize performance outcomes. I suggest that building a dynamic AIS capability enables accounting process and organizational performance. Using the dynamic capabilities framework (Teece 2007). I propose that a dynamic AIS capability can bedeveloped through the synergy of three competencies: having (1) a flexible AIS, (2) a complementary business intelligence system, and (3) accounting professionals with IT technical competency. Using survey data, I find evidence of a positive association between a dynamic AIS capability, accounting process performance, and overall firm performance. The results suggest that developing a dynamic AIS resource can add value to an organization. This study provides guidance for organizations looking to leverage the performance outcomes of their environment.

회계정보시스템은 회계자료를 취합 처리하여 의사결정자에게 가치 있는 정보를 제공한다. 그러나 최근의 급속한 환경변화에 있어 지속경영으로서의 회계정보시스템은 성과를 최적화하기 위한 조직의 필요성에 적합되어야 한다. 동적 회계정보시스템의 역량은 회계처리와 조직의 성과를 향상시킬 것으로 기대한다. 동적역량틀(Dynamic capabilities framework:DCF)을 이용함으로서 동적인 회계정보시스템의 역량은 세 가지 관점에서 시너지효과를 발휘할 수 있는 것으로 기대한다. 1) 유연한 회계정보시스템, 2) 보완적인 비즈니스 지능시스템 및 3) 정보기술 자산을 통한 회계 전문화의 세 가지 영역의 시너지효과를 발휘할 수 있을 것이다. 본 연구를 통하여 동적 회계정보시스템 역량, 회계처리 성과 및 기업성과의 상관성을 검증하고자 한다. 연구결과, 동적 회계정보시스템 자원을 개발함으로써 조직의 가치를 더할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 회계정보시스템 환경의 성과산출에 지렛대 역할을 할 수 있는 가이드를 제공할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Liu, W. Ke, K. K. Wei & Z. Hua. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452-1462. DOI : 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016
  2. D. J. Teece, G. Pisano & A. Shuen. (1977). Dynamic Capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
  3. E. Turban, J. K. Lee, D. King, T. P. Liang & D. Turban. (2009). Electronic Commerce 2010: A Managerial Perspective. New Jersey : Prentice Hall Press.
  4. F. J. Mata, L. Fuerst & J. B Barney. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quertly, 19(4), 487-505. DOI : 10.2307/249630
  5. M. Wade & J. Hulland. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research; Review, extension and suggestions for future research. MIS Quertly, 28(1), 107-142. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148626
  6. D. J. Teece. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. DOI : 10.1002/smj.640
  7. J. B. Barney. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. DOI : 10.1177/014920639101700108
  8. S. Zahra, R. Sisoda & B. Matherne. (1999). Exploring the dynamic links between competitive and technology strategies. European Management Journal, 17(2), 188-203. DOI : 10.1016/s0263-2373(98)00078-4
  9. A. Nicolaou. (2000). A contingency model of perceived effectiveness in accounting information systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 1(2), 91-105. DOI : 10.1016/s1467-0895(00)00006-3
  10. M. B. Romney & P. J. Steinbart. (2011). Accounting Information Systems. New Jersey : Pearson.
  11. T. C. Powell & A. Dent-Micallef. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: THE role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375-405. DOI : 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::aid-smj876>3.3.co;2-z
  12. Y. Lu & K. Ramamurthy. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 931-954. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967
  13. O. Isik, M. C. Jones & A. Sidorova. (2013). Business intelligence success: The roles of BI capabilities and decision environments. Information and Management, 50 (1), 13-23. DOI : 10.1016/j.im.2012.12.001
  14. K. I. Kim. (2011). Affects in Implementation Level of IMS Activity and Performance according to IMS directivity and Fitness of Firm's Culture. Journal of IT Convergence Society for SMB, 1(1), 1-8.
  15. Y. S. Jeong. (2015). Business Process Model for Efficient SMB using Big Data. Journal of Convergrnce Society for SMB, 5(4), 11-17.
  16. J. C. Shin & K. I. Kim. (2016). A Study on the success factors in the Enterprise Information Systems introduced. Journal of Convergence Society for SMB, 6(4), 1-8.
  17. M. Hannula & V. Pirttimaki. (2003). Business intelligence empirical study on the top 50 Finnish companies. Journal of American Academy of Business, 2(2), 593-599.