인간행동과 음악연구 (Journal of Music and Human Behavior)

  • 제14권2호
  • /
  • Pages.1-18
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2288-2774(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-9076(eISSN)
한국음악치료교육학회 (Korean Music Therapy Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

인공와우이식 난청인의 말소리 운율변화에 따른 구어 이해와 음도 변별, 선율윤곽 확인 간 관련성

The Relationship Between Perception of Prosody, Pitch Discrimination, and Melodic Contour Identification in Cochlear Implants Recipients

  • 김은연 (명지대학교 사회교육대학원 언어치료학과) ;
  • 문일준 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원) ;
  • 조양선 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원) ;
  • 정원호 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원) ;
  • 홍성화 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성창원병원)
  • Kim, Eun Yeon (Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Graduate School, Myongji University) ;
  • Moon, Il Joon (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Seoul Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Cho, Yang-sun (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Seoul Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Chung, Won-ho (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Seoul Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Hong, Sung Hwa (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Changwon Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 투고 : 2017.09.26
  • 심사 : 2017.11.21
  • 발행 : 2017.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 인공와우이식 난청인(N = 15)을 대상으로 말소리 운율변화에 따른 구어 이해와 음도 변별, 선율윤곽 확인(Melodic contour identification: MCI) 간 관련성을 살펴보았다. 말소리 운율 변화에 따른 구어이해를 살펴보기 위해 말소리 운율지각 검사를 시행하였고, 긍정적인 운율과 부정적인 운율 조건에 따른 의미 변화를 피검자에게 판단하게 하였다. 검사 시 긍정적인 의미(Positive meaning: PW)와 중립적인 의미(Neutral meaning: NW)를 갖는 낱말 및 낱말 조합 형태를 제시하고, 긍정적인 운율과 부정적인 운율 조건에 따른 의미 변화를 피검자에게 판단하게 하였다. 음도 변별 검사를 위해서는 단음도 변화 변별 과제와 3개 음으로 구성된 패턴에서의 음도 변별 과제가 실시되었다. MCI 검사는 기대 확률을 달리한 세부 검사 1, 2로 구성하여 시행하였다. 실시한 검사 간 관련성을 살펴본 결과, 말소리 운율지각 검사 결과는 보청기 착용으로도 청지각적 이득을 기대할 수 없었던 기간과 유의한 관련성을 보였다. PW와 NW 검사에서 운율 조건에 따라 유의한 수행 차를 보였지만, 단어조합 형태에 따른 통계적 유의성은 발견하지 못하였다. 말소리 운율지각 검사 결과는 MCI 1과 유의한 상관을 보인 반면(p < .01), 말지각 검사 수행력과는 유의한 관련성을 보이지 않았다. 이는 인공와우이식 후 시각적 단서 없이 말소리, 음소 지각이 가능해졌다 하더라도 미묘한 운율 변화에 따른 의미 지각의 제한은 계속될 수 있음을 시사한다. 또한 인공와우이식 후 선율윤곽 변화 확인은 음도 변별에 비해 제한을 보이며, 운율지각과 관련 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.

The relationships between the ability to understand changes in meaning depending on the prosody of spoken words and the ability to perceive pitch and melodic contour in cochlear implants (CI) recipients were examined. Fifteen postlingual CI recipients were measured in terms of speech prosody perception, speech perception, pitch discrimination (PD), and melody contour identification (MCI). The speech prosody perception test consists of words with positive (PW) and neutral meaning (NW). Participants were asked to identify the meaning of words depending on the conditions of positive and negative prosody. The MCI consists of subtests 1 and 2 with different chance levels to choose. Then, the relationships between speech prosody perception, speech perception, PD, and MCI performance were analyzed. There was a significant difference in identifying the meaning of words expressed in a different prosody between the PW and NW conditions. Speech prosody perception showed a significant correlation with MCI 1 while there was no significant relationship with speech perception. Although speech perception may be possible after CI, limited spoken word comprehension due to decreased sensitivity for prosodic changes may persist in CI recipients. In addition, there was a limitation in perception of melodic contour change compared to pitch discrimination, which is related to speech prosody perception.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Carter, A. K., Dillon, C. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (2002). Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: Suprasegmental analyses. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16(8), 619-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200021000034958
  2. Cole, F. B., & Flexer, C. (2011). Children with hearing loss: Developing listening and talking, birth to six (2nd ed.). United Kingdom, OX: Plural Press.
  3. Cutler, A. (1997). The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing. Speech Communication, 21(1-2), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00075-1
  4. Drennan, W. R., & Rubinstein, J. T. (2008). Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(5), 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.08.0118
  5. Galvin, J. J., Fu, Q. J., & Nogaki, G. (2007). Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear and Hearing, 28(3), 302-319. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000261689.35445.20
  6. Galvin, J. J., Fu, Q. J., & Oba, S. (2008). Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(4), EL189-EL195. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2961171
  7. Galvin, J. J., Fu, Q. J., & Shannon, R. V. (2009). Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169(1), 518-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04551.x
  8. Gfeller, K., & Lansing, C. R. (1991). Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(4), 916-920. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3404.916
  9. Govaerts, P. J., De Beukelaer, C., Daemers, K., De Ceulaer, G., Yperman, M., Somers, T., Schatteman, I., & Offeciers, F. E. (2002). Outcome of cochlear implantation at different ages from 0 to 6 years. Otology & Neurotology, 23(6), 885-890. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200211000-00013
  10. Grossmann, T., Striano, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Infants' electric brain responses to emotional prosody. NeuroReport, 16(16), 1825-1828. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000185964.34336.b1
  11. Han, K. (2005). How to realize rhetorical irony in Korean(한국어 반어법의 실현 방법). Journal of Humanities Therapy, 13, 1-35.
  12. Jeong, S. W., & Lee, Y. M. (2015). Rating scales(척도검사). In The Korean Audiological Society (Ed.), Speech perception test in practice(말지각검사의 실제) (pp. 39-45). Seoul: Hakjisa.
  13. Jung, Y. H. (2000). A study on implicative meaning of why("왜"의 함축 의미 연구). Sae-Ul Review, 13, 139-166.
  14. Kent, R. D., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1982). Prosodic disturbance and neurologic lesion. Brain and Language, 15(2), 259-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(82)90060-8
  15. Kim, M. H. (2005). The development of Korean interrogatives as discourse markers(국어 의문사의 담화표지화). Discourse and Cognition, 12(2), 41-63.
  16. Kong, Y. Y., Cruz, R., Jones, J. A., & Zeng, F. G. (2004). Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear and Hearing, 25(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000120365.97792.2F
  17. Lee, H. G. (2008). The pragmatics of the discourse particle eti in Korean(한국어 담화표지어 어디의 화용분석). The Korean Language and Literature, 44, 83-111.
  18. Lee, S. S. (2014). Descriptive grammar and school grammar on Korean phonology(국어 음운론 에서의 기술 문법과 학교 문법). Journal of Korean Linguistics, 68(3), 207-231.
  19. Limb, C. J. (2006). Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 14(5), 337-340. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.moo.0000244192.59184.bd
  20. Limb, C. J., & Rubinstein, J. T. (2012). Current research on music perception in cochlear implant users. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 45(1), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.021
  21. McDermott, H. J. (2004). Music perception with cochlear implants: A review. Trends in Amplification, 8(2), 49-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/108471380400800203
  22. Ministry of Environment (2009). Noise and Vibration Control Act - Enforcement Ordinance. 2(소음 진동 규제법 시행령 제 2조). Seoul.
  23. Moon, I. J., Kim, E. Y., Jeong, J. O., Chung, W. H., Cho, Y. S., & Hong, S. H. (2012). The influence of various factors on the performance of repetition tests in adults with cochlear implants. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 269(3), 739-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1699-3
  24. Ok, J. D., & Yoon, B. C. (2010). A study on the satisfaction of hearing impaired college students who received cochlear implants and their adaptation state(청각장애 대학생의 인공와우 착용에 대한 만족도 및 적응실태에 관한 연구). Journal of Special Education, 17(2), 209-232.
  25. Ramus, F. (2002). Language discrimination by newborns: Teasing apart phonotactic, rhythmic, and intonational cues. Annual Review of Language Acquisition, 2(1), 85-115. https://doi.org/10.1075/arla.2.05ram
  26. Schauwers, K., Gillis, S., Daemers, K., De Beukelaer, C., De Ceulaer, G., Yperman, M., & Govaerts, P. J. (2004). Normal hearing and language development in a deaf-born child. Otology & Neurotology, 25(6), 924-929. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200411000-00011
  27. Shin, J. (2000). Understanding of phonetics(말소리의 이해). Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa.
  28. Tobey, E. A., Angelette, S., Murchison, C., Nicosia, J., Sprague, S., Staller, S. J., Brimacombe, J. A., & Beiter, A. L. (1991). Speech production performance in children with multichannel cochlear implants. The American Journal of Otology, 12, 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-0709(91)90148-9
  29. Tobey, E. A., & Hasenstab, M. S. (1991). Effects of a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon speech production in children. Ear and Hearing, 12(4), 48S-54S. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199108001-00007
  30. Wambacq, I. J., Shea-Miller, K. J., & Abubakr, A. (2004). Non-voluntary and voluntary processing of emotional prosody: an event-related potentials study. NeuroReport, 15(3), 555-559. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200403010-00034
  31. Zhi, M. Z. (1993). Durational aspects of Korean(소리의 길이). The New Korean Language Life, 3(1), 39-57.
  32. Zhi, M. Z., Choi, U. C., & Kim, S. H. (1993). Durational aspects of Korean: An experimental phonetic study(우리말 소리의 길이: 실험 음성학적 연구). Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Human and Cognitive Language Technology, 119-130.