대한치과기공학회지 (Journal of Technologic Dentistry)

  • 제39권4호
  • /
  • Pages.227-233
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-3954(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-5218(eISSN)
대한치과기공학회 (Korean Academy of Dental Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

치과용 스캐너의 광원에 따른 디지털 모형의 정확도 비교연구

Comparative study of accuracy of digitized model fabricated by difference optical source of non-contact 3D dental scanner

  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Technology, Dongnam Health University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Soo (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Shingu University) ;
  • Shim, Jeong-Seok (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Shingu University)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.24
  • 심사 : 2017.12.20
  • 발행 : 2017.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of digital models fabricated by difference optical source of non-contact 3D dental scanner. Methods: A master model with the prepared upper full arch tooth was used. Stone model(N=10) were produced from master model, and on the other hands, digital models were made with the 3D dental scanner(Blue, white, red optical source). The linear distance between the reference points were measured and analyzed on the Delcam $Copycad^{(R)}$ graphic software. The results were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test(${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: There were considerable differences in mean values between optical source within each color(blue, white, red), and this difference was not statistically significant(p>0.05). Conclusion : Three different color of dental scanner optical source showed clinically acceptable accuracies of full arch digital model produced by them. Besides, these results will have to be confirmed in further clinical studies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Birmbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 29(8), 494-505, 2008.
  2. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc, 140(10), 1301-1304, 2009. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
  3. Creed B, Chung HK, Jeryl DE, James JX, Lee A. Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurement obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod, 17(2), 49-56, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.010
  4. Delong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res, 90, 434-440, 2003.
  5. Kim JH, Kim KB. Evaluation of dimensional stability of digital dental model fabricated by impression scanning method. J Dent Hyg Sci, 14, 15-21, 2014.
  6. Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim HT, Kim JE, Kim WC, Kim JH. Reliability, accuracy of evaluations obtained from CEREC AC system digital impression: an in-vitro study. J Korean Acad Dent Tech, 34, 121-128, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2012.34.2.121
  7. Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim JH, Kim HY. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod, 44, 69-76, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69
  8. Lee KT, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. Three-dimensional evaluation on the repeatabillty and reproducibility of dental scanner-based digital models. J Korean Acad Dent Tech, 34, 213-220, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2012.34.3.213
  9. Luthardt RG, Kuhmstedt P, Walter MH. A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials. Dent Mater, 19, 19-24, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00013-1
  10. Mormann WH, Brandestini M. In: State of the art of CAD/CAM restorations: 20 years of CEREC (Mormann WH) London. Quintessence, 1-8, 2006.
  11. Persson M, Andersson M, Bergman B. The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 74, 223-229, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80127-1
  12. Raberin M, Laumon B, Martin J, Brunner F. Dimensions and form of dental arches in subjects with normal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 104, 67-72, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93)70029-N
  13. Rodriguez JM, Curtis RV, Bartlett DW. Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry. Dent Mater, 25, 500-505, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.003
  14. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 124, 101-105, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5
  15. Witkowski S. (CAD-)/CAM in dental technology, Quintessence Dent Technol, 28, 169-184, 2005.
  16. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod, 73, 301-306, 2003.