기술혁신학회지 (Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.1159-1191
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-2912(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8666(eISSN)
한국기술혁신학회 (Korea Technology Innovation Society)
권호 표지

공공 R&D의 기술이전이 기업의 성장에 미치는 효과 연구

A Research on the Impacts of Technology Rransfer in Government-sponsored Research to the Growth of Technology Licensees

  • 김준혁 (한국과학기술정보연구원 슈퍼컴퓨팅본부)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.31
  • 심사 : 2017.11.01
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 개방형 혁신 개념을 활용하여 공공기술이전을 기업의 외부 R&D의 일환으로 간주한 뒤 기술수요기업의 관점에서 공공기술이전의 산업별 특성과 내부 R&D와의 상호작용에 대해 탐구하였다. NTIS 기술료 데이터와 한국기업정보 데이터를 매칭한 뒤 2008년부터 2011년까지 일어난 1,980개 기업의 7,645개 기술이전 자료를 추출, 회귀분석과 분위회귀분석을 실시하였다. 그 동안 기업이 공공기술이전으로부터 얻는 효과가 정성적으로 다루어져 왔으나, 본 연구에서는 산업과 기업의 특성에 따른 효과의 편차를 연구하기 위하여 정량적인 DB를 구축하고 통계적 분석을 시행하였다. 분석 결과 기술이전이 매출성장에 가하는 효과는 중고위기술과 고위기술 분야의 일부 기업들에게 편중되는 경향이 있었다. 또한 기간별(1 2 3년 후) 매출의 경우 기술이전은 기술이전 다음해의 매출에 주로 영향을 주지만, 내부 R&D의 효과는 주로 2년 후의 매출에 집중되어 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 OECD 기술집약도 기준 산업분류와 4개 지정 산업군(자동차, 전자, 반도체, 화학)별로 공공기술이전의 효과에 편차가 있는 것으로 나타났으나, 기업 크기별로는 효과에 유의한 차이가 없었다.

This study considered technology commercialization as a sort of external R&D of the licensee firm. Then, this study analyzed industrial characteristics of technology commercialization and interactions between internal R&D and technology commercialization from the licensee's viewpoint. Data from NTIS (National science and Technology Information Service) and KED (Korea Enterprise Database) were matched. 7,645 technology commercializations from 1,980 firms were extracted. Afterward, OLS and quantile regression were applied to the extracted data. The impact of technology commercialization on firm growth was concentrated to few high-tech and medium high-tech firms. Technology commercialization was effective in the growth in a year while internal R&D was effective in the growth in two years. The firm size was insiginificant variable. In analysis of 4 selected industries (automobile, electronics, semiconductor, chemistry), the impact was skewed among industries. Though the importance of technology commercialization is widely acknowledged, quantitative analyses like this study are uncommon. Therefore, this study can be useful for the tailored industry solutions for technology commercialization.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김미선.연승민.김재수.이병희 (2015), "연구수행 주체에 따른 국가 R&D 기술이전 성과 영향 요인 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 15(11): 559-570. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.11.559
  2. 김선영.이병헌 (2007), "산학연 기술협력과 흡수 능력이 중소기업의 기술혁신성과에 미치는 영향", 한국벤처창업대회 학술대회, 2: 37-64.
  3. 문성욱 (2011), "한국 제조 기업들의 외부지식 활용 결정요인 연구", 기술혁신학회지 (14)3: 405-430.
  4. 미래창조과학부 (2016), 우리나라 과학기술 주요 지표 한눈에 보기.
  5. 민재웅.김영준 (2015), "기업의 공공기술 도입동기에 따른 사업화 성공요인 분석", 지식재산연구, 10(2): 225-256.
  6. 박선영.박현우.조만형, (2006), "특허분석을 통한 기술혁신과 기업성과의 관계 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 9(1): 1-25.
  7. 박지원.윤수진.박범수 (2015), "공공 R&D 이전기술의 사업화 성공요인 분석 및 성과제고 방안", 기술혁신학회지, 18(1): 28-48.
  8. 손원익 (2014), "중소기업 R&D 재정지출의 현황 및 문제점", 재정포럼, 214(0): 23-34.
  9. 안치수.이영덕 (2011), "우리나라 개방형 혁신활동의 영향요인에 관한 실증분석 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 14(3): 431-465.
  10. 이선영.서상혁 (2011), "정부지원 중소기업 기술협력사업의 성과판별 요인에 관한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 14(3): 664-688.
  11. 임효정.이원영 (2009), "한국 기업의 연구개발 외주활동 결정요인 분석", 기술혁신연구, 17(1): 179-204.
  12. 한국과학기술기획평가원 (2016a), 2015년도 연구개발활동조사분석.
  13. 한국과학기술기획평가원 (2016b), 2014년도 연구개발활동조사보고서.
  14. 한국산업기술진흥원 (2015), 2015 공공연구기관 기술이전.사업화 실태조사.
  15. 한국산업기술진흥원 (2012), 기술이전사업화 통계조사 분석 자료집.
  16. 한정민.박철민.구본철 (2015), "연구개발성과의 기술사업화 활성화를 위한 영향요인 분석 연구", 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회, 19: 21-26.
  17. Ahn, J., Minshall, T. and Mortana, L. (2014), "Longitudinal Effects of Open R&D Strategy on Firm Performance: Comparative Study of the UK and Korea", R&D Management Conference 2014.
  18. Almeida, P., Hohberger, J. and Parada, P. ( 2011), "Individual Scientific Collaborations and Firm-level Innovation", Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6): 1571-1599. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr030
  19. Anderson, R. T., Daim, T. U. and Lavoie, F. F. (2007), "Measuring the Efficiency of University Technology Transfer", Technovation, 27: 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.003
  20. Arocena, R. and Sutz, J. (2003), "Knowledge, Innovation and Learning: Systems and Policies in the North and in the South", In J. E. Cassiolato, H. M. M. Lastres, & M. L. Maciel (Eds.), Systems of innovation and development: Evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  21. Audretsch, D. B. and Lehmann, E. E. (2005), "Mansfield's Missing Link: The Impact of Knowledge Spillovers on Firm Growth", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1): 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-004-4367-6
  22. Becker, B. and Hall, S. G. (2013), "Do R&D Strategies in High-tech Sectors Differ from Those in Low Tech Sectors? An Alternative Approach to Testing the Pooling Assumption", Economic Change and Restructuring, 46: 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-012-9122-7
  23. Bekker, R. and Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008) "Analysing Technology Transfer Channels between University and Industry: To What Degree do Sectors Also Matter?" Research Policy, 37: 1837-1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
  24. Berchicci, L. (2013), "Towards an Open Innovation System: Internal R&D Investment, External Knowledge Acquisition and Innovative Performance", Research Policy, 42: 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
  25. Bozeman, B., Rimes, H. and Youtie, J. (2015), "The Evolving State-of-the-art in Technology Transfer Research: Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model", Research Policy, 44: 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
  26. Chesbrough, H. (2003), "The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Interllectual Property", California Management Review, 45(3): 33-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166175
  27. Coad, A. and Rao, R. (2008), "Innovation and Firm Growth in High-tech Sectors: A Quantile Regression Approach", Research Policy, 37: 633-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.003
  28. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990), "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  29. Daunfeldt, S. and Elert, N. (2013), "When is Gibrat's Law a Law?", Small Business Economics, 41: 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9404-x
  30. De Jong, J. P. J., Kalvet, K. and Vanhaverbeke, W. (2010), "Exploring a Theoretical Framework to Structure the Public Policy Implications of Open Innovation", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(8): 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.522771
  31. Demirel, P. and Mazzucato, M. (2012), "Innovation and Firm Growth: Is R&D Worth it?", Industry and Innovation, 19(1): 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.649057
  32. Enkel, E., Gassman, O. and Chesbrough, H. (2009), "Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon", R&D Management, 39(4): 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x
  33. Eom, B. Y. and Lee, K. (2008), "The Determinants of Industry-University/GRI Linkages and Their Impacts on Firm Performance: The Case of Korea", IV Globelics Conference at Mexico city.
  34. Fontana, R., Geuna, A. and Matt, M. (2006), "Factors Affecting University-industry R&D Projects: The Importance of Searching, Screening and Signalling", Research Policy, 35: 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001
  35. Garcia-Manjon, J. V. and Romero-Merino, M. E. (2012), "Research, Development, and Firm Growth, Empirical Evidence from European Top R&D Spending Firms", Research Policy, 41: 1084-1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.017
  36. Gilsing, V., Bekkers, R., Freitas, I. M. D. and Steen M. V. D. (2011), "Differences in Technology Transfer between Science-based and Development-based Industries: Transfer Mechanisms and Barriers", Technovation, 31: 638-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.009
  37. Grimpe, C. and Kaiser, U. (2010), "Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing", Journal of Management Studies, 47(8): 1483-1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.x
  38. Hagedoorn, J. and Wang, N. (2012), "Is There Complementarity or Substitutability between Internal and External R&D Strategies?", Research Policy, 41: 1072-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.012
  39. Heisey, P. W. and Adelman, S. W. (2011), "Research Expenditures, Technology Transfer Activity, and University Licensing Revenue", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1): 38-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9129-z
  40. Huang, K. and Yu, J. C. (2011), "The Effect of Competitive and Non-competitive R&D Collaboration on Firm Innovation", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(4): 383-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9155-x
  41. Huang, T. (2010), "Managing Technology Transfer in Open Innovation: the Case Study in Taiwan", Modern Applied Science, 4(10): 1-12.
  42. Kang, K. H. and Kang, J. (2010), "Does Partner Type Matter in R&D Collaboration for Product Innovation?", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(8): 945-959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.520473
  43. Kim, S. K., Lee, B. G., Park, B. S. and Oh, K. S. (2011), "The Effect of R&D, Technology Commercialization Capabilities and Innovation Performance", Technological Economic Development of Economy, 17(4): 563-578. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.603481
  44. Kochenkova, A., Grimaldi, R. and Munari, F. (2016), "Public Policy Measures in Support of Knowledge Transfer Activities: a Review of Academic Literatures", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3): 407-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9416-9
  45. Koenker, R. and Bassett, J. J. (1978), "Regression Quantiles", Econometrica, 46(1): 33-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643
  46. Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2004), "Searching High and Low: What Types of Firms Use Universities as a Source of Innovation?", Research Policy, 33: 1201-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
  47. Lee, C. Y. (2010), "A Theory of Firm Growth: Learning Capability, Knowledge Threshold, and Patterns of Growth", Research Policy, 39: 278-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.008
  48. Leisyte, L. (2011), "University Commercialization Policies and Their Implementation in the Netherlands and the United States", Science and Public Policy, 38(6): 437-448. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12960315267778
  49. Link, A. N. and Siegel, D. S. (2005), "Generating Science-based Growth: an Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Organizational Incentives on University-industry Technology Transfer", European Journal of Finance, 11: 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847042000254211
  50. Lokshin, B., Belderbos, R. and Carree, M. (2008), "The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(3): 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00503.x
  51. Love, J. H. and Roper, S. (2002), "Internal versus External R&D: A Study of R&D Choice with Sample Selection", International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9(2): 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510210134998
  52. Mata, J. and Woerter, M. (2013), "Risky Innovation: The Impact of Internal and External R&D Strategies upon the Distribution of Returns", Research Policy, 42: 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.08.004
  53. Mowery, D. C. and Sampat, B. N. (2005), "Universities in National Innovation System", In J. Fargerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  54. Min, J. W. and Kim, Y. J. (2014), "What Affects Corporate Commercialization of Public Technology Transfer in Korea?", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 22(2): 302-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2014.956858
  55. Nunes, P. M., Serrasquiero, Z. and Leitao, J. (2012), "Is There a Linear Relationship between R&D Intensity and Growth? Empirical Evidence of Non-high-tech vs. High-tech SMEs", Research Policy, 41: 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.011
  56. OECD (2011), "ISIC Rev.3. Technology Intensity Definition; Classification of Manufacturing Industries into Categories Based on R&D Intensities", https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/ 48350231.pdf/ (7 July 2011).
  57. Palmberg, C. (2001), "Sectoral Patterns of Innovation and Competence Requirements - a Closer Look at Low-tech Industries", Sitra Report Series, No. 8.
  58. Pippel, G. (2014), "R&D Cooperation for Non-technological Innovations", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(7): 611-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2013.871167
  59. Pippel, G. and Seefeld, V. (2016), "R&D Cooperation with Scientific Institutions: a Difference-in-difference Approach", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(5): 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1073480
  60. Raesfeld, A., Geurts, P., Jansen, M., Boshuizen, J. and Luttge, R. (2012), "Influence of Partner Diversity on Collaborative Public R&D Project Outcomes: A Study of Application and Commercialization of Nanotechnologies in the Netherland", Technovation, 32: 227-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.12.001
  61. Rasmussen, E., Moen, O. and Gulbrandsen, M. (2006), "Initiatives to Promote Commercialization of University Knowledge", Technovation, 26: 518-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.005
  62. Schartinger, D., Rammera, C., Fischer, M.M. and Frohlich, J. (2002), "Knowledge Interactions between Universities and Industry in Austria: Sectoral Patterns and Determinants", Research Policy 31, 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1
  63. Silva, D. R. G., Furtado, A. T. and Vonortas, N. S. (2017), "University-industry R&D Cooperation in Brazil: a Sectoral Approach", The Journal of Technology Transfer, Published Online.
  64. Stam, E. (2010), "Growth beyond Gibrat: Firm Growth Processes and Strategies", Small Business Economics, 35: 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9294-3
  65. Strulik, H. (2007), "Too Much of a Good Thing? the Quantitative Economics of R&D-driven Growth Revisited", Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109(2): 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2007.00499.x
  66. Thursby, J. G. and Kemp, S. (2002), "Growth and Productive Efficiency of Intellectual Property Licensing", Research Policy, 31: 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8
  67. Wang, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W. and Roijakke, N. (2012), "Exploring the Impact of Open Innovation on National Systems of Innovation - a Theoretical Analysis", Technology Forecasting & Social Change. 79(3): 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.009
  68. Yu, G. J. and Lee, J. (2017), "When Should a Firm Collaborate with Research Organizations for Innovation Performance? The Moderating Role of Innovation Orientation, Size, and Age", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6): 1451-1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9469-4