DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Tooth Whitening Efficacy between Gel and Strip with Light Activator

광을 이용한 2.9% 과산화수소 함유 젤과 첩부제의 치아미백효과 비교

  • 김지혜 ((주) LG생활건강 기술연구원) ;
  • 방성은 ((주) LG생활건강 기술연구원) ;
  • 김지영 ((주) LG생활건강 기술연구원) ;
  • 안재현 ((주) LG생활건강 기술연구원)
  • Received : 2017.09.01
  • Accepted : 2017.10.12
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

The study aimed to compare the whitening efficacy of a strip and gel containing 2.9% hydrogen peroxide, using a tooth whitening light activator. The whitening effect was compared through in vitro and in vivo studies. In the in vitro study, we used stained hydroxyapatite (HAP) specimens as artificial teeth. HAP specimens were made using HAP powder and polyvinyl alcohol solution, and stained by modified Stookey's method. A whitening gel and whitening strip were applied to the respective specimens for 20 minutes, with a light activator. The color changes were measured using a colorimeter. In the in vivo study, one group (test 1) used the gel with a light activator and the other group (test 2) used a strip with the same activator for 15 minutes a day, for four consecutive days. An organoleptic evaluation using a Vita shade guide and instrumental evaluation using a Shade eye-NCC (Shofu Co., Japan) were performed. The color change values (${\Delta}E^*$) in the in vitro study revealed the strip with the light activator to be more effective than the gel with the same activator (p<0.001). In the in vivo study, even though there was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the ${\Delta}E^*$, using either the Shade eye-NCC or the Vita shade guide, the change in yellowness (${\Delta}b^*$) was statistically significant (p=0.024). In conclusion, test 2 group that used 2.9% hydrogen peroxide strip with a light activator, showed a tendency towards increased whitening than test 1 group that used the gel with the same activator; however further studies are needed to validate the above finding.

본 연구는 OTC 미백술에서 사용되고 있는 2.9% 과산화수소 함유 젤과 과산화수소 함유 첩부제 제품을 광조사기와 각각 혼합 사용했을 때의 실험실 및 임상적 효과를 비교 평가하고자 하였다. 실험실적 평가는 변형된 Stookey's method를 이용하여 착색시킨 HAP 시편을 이용하여 20분간 각 실험제품을 적용하고 광을 조사하였다. 임상적 평가에서는 하루 15분씩 4일간 각 실험제품과 광조사를 진행하였고, Vita 색조편을 이용한 육안적 평가와 Shade eye-NCC를 이용한 기기적인 평가를 진행하였다. 실험실적 평가 결과 과산화수소 함유 첩부제와 광을 사용한 군이 과산화수소 함유 젤과 광을 사용한 군에 비해 색조 변화 값(${\Delta}E^*$)이 유의하게 높게 나타났다(p<0.001). 임상적 평가에서는 Vita 색조편을 이용한 육안평가 결과, 첩부제와 광을 사용한 군이 젤과 광을 사용한 군보다 제품 사용 전후 색조 변화 값이 좀 더 큰 경향을 나타내었으나 군간 유의차는 없었다(p>0.05). Shade eye-NCC를 이용한 기기적 평가 결과에서 ${\Delta}E^*$값은 첩부제와 광을 사용한 군이 젤과 광을 사용한 군보다 좀 더 높았으나 군간 유의차는 나타나지 않았고(p>0.05), ${\Delta}b^*$값은 첩부제와 광을 사용한 군이 유의하게 높게 나타났다(p=0.024). 본 연구에서는 광조사기와 혼합 사용하는 과산화수소 젤 또는 첩부제 형태의 물리적 성상에 따른 치아미백제품의 미백효과 평가 결과 첩부제 형태의 과산화수소 제제가 젤 형태보다 치아미백효과가 높은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nathoo SA: The chemistry and mechanisms of extrinsic and intrinsic discoloration. J Am Dent Assoc 128 Suppl: 6S-10S, 1997. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0428
  2. Heymann HO: Tooth whitening: facts and fallacies. Br Dent J 198: 514, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812298
  3. Kim JH, Moon KT, Kim JH, Ahn JH: In-vitro whitening efficacy of hydrogen peroxide strips with primer. J Dent Hyg Sci 14: 191-197, 2014.
  4. Park DY, Jung SH, Ma DS, Chang SY, Yun SY: Randomized controlled clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of a 2.6% hydrogen peroxide containing tooth-whitening strips. J Korean Acad Oral Health 26: 385-396, 2002.
  5. Bahng KH, Yoo SM, Park YD: Maintenance of teeth brightness with 0.3% H2O2 containing toothpaste after use of 3.0% H2O2 brightening gel. J Korean Acad Oral Health 31: 167-175, 2007.
  6. Park DY, Ma DS, Cho KM, Jeong DB, Jung SH: Efficacy of a paint-on, self-applied, humidity-facilitated setting 2.8% hydrogen peroxide whitening gel. J Korean Acad Oral Health 29: 397-406, 2005.
  7. Gerlach RW, Gibb RD, Sagel PA: A randomized clinical trial comparing a novel 5.3% hydrogen peroxide whitening strip to 10%, 15%, and 20% carbamide peroxide tray-based bleaching systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl (29): S22-S28, 2000.
  8. Abbot CH: Bleaching discolored teeth by means of 30% perhydrol and the electric light rays. J Allied Dent Soc 13: 259-262, 1918.
  9. Goldstein RE: In-office bleaching: where we came from, where we are today. J Am Dent Assoc 128 Suppl: 11S-15S, 1997. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0415
  10. Shim YS, Woo HS: Tooth bleaching effect by light activation on the tooth surface and intra-pulpal temperature: an in vitro study. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 14: 585-591, 2014. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.04.585
  11. Stookey GK, Burkhard TA, Schemehorn BR: In vitro removal of stain with dentifrices. J Dent Res 61: 1236-1239, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610110501
  12. Reinhardt JW, Eivins SE, Swift EJ Jr, Denehy GE: A clinical study of nightguard vital bleaching. Quintessence Int 24: 379-384, 1993.
  13. Lee HJ, Kim MY, Kim KH, Kwon TY: 35% Hydrogen peroxide gel in the whitening effect and enamel changes. J Dent Hyg Sci 8: 255-260, 2008.
  14. Almeida LC, Riehl H, Santos PH, Sundfeld ML, Briso AL: Clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of different bleaching therapies in vital teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 32: 303-309, 2012.
  15. Mena-Serrano AP, Garcia E, Luque-Martinez I, Grande R, Loguercio AD, Reis A: A single-blind randomized trial about the effect of hydrogen peroxide concentration on light-activated bleaching. Oper Dent 41: 455-464, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-077-C
  16. Ziemba SL, Felix H, MacDonald J, Ward M: Clinical evaluation of a novel dental whitening lamp and light-catalyzed peroxide gel. J Clin Dent 16: 123-127, 2005.
  17. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety: The guidelines for the evaluation of the safety and performance of tooth whitening light irradiation devices. Retrieved April 26, 2017, from http://www.mfds.go.kr/index.do?mid=1769&seq=12298&cmd=v(2015, October 16).
  18. Paravina RD: Performance assessment of dental shade guides. J Dent 37 Suppl 1: e15-e20, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.02.005
  19. Gross MD, Moser JB: A colorimetric study of coffee and tea staining of four composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 4: 311-322, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00997.x
  20. Asmussen E: An accelerated test for color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 39: 329-332, 1981. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358109162704
  21. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG: Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 97: 200-208, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
  22. Joiner A: Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 32 Suppl 1: 3-12, 2004.

Cited by

  1. Surface Damage and Bleaching Effect according to the Application Type of Home Tooth Bleaching Applicants vol.20, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2020.20.4.252