DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ammonia and Hydrogen Sulfide Removal from Swine House Exhaust Air Using a Dip Injection Wet Scrubber

  • Shin, Myeongcheol (Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Seunghun (Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Wi, Jisoo (Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Ahn, Heekwon (Department of Animal Biosystems Science, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.22
  • 심사 : 2017.11.16
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31

초록

This study was conducted to evaluate the odor reduction efficacy of the dip injection wet scrubber (DIWS) using tap water as washing fluid. The $NH_3$ and $H_2S$ removal efficiency of 7 day batch operated DIWS was evaluated twice over a total of 14 days of experiment. The $NH_3$ removal efficiency ranged from 26 to 37%. The $H_2S$ removal efficiency was between 22 and 30%. The pH of the washing fluid maintained below 8 and the $NH_4{^+}$ concentration tended to keep constant around 350 ppm after 5 days of washing-fluid replacement. Therefore, the 5-day washing fluid replacement interval is more preferable than the 7-day interval. The $NH_4{^+}$ concentration and the electrical conductivity (EC) showed a high correlation. The EC measurement can be used as an alternative to conventional $NH_4{^+}$ concentration measurement method for real time monitoring of washing fluid condition.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Han B.W., H.J. Kim, Y.J. Kim, and K.S. Han. 2007. Removal characteristics of gaseous contaminants by a wet scrubber with different packing materials. J. Korean Soc.Atmos. Environ. 23(6):744-751. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2007.23.6.744
  2. Han, J.S. and S.J. Park. 2012. A study of the correlation between odor intensity and the concentration of sulfur compounds, $NH_3$, and TMA. Korean. J. Odor Res. Eng. 11(4):167-173. https://doi.org/10.11161/jkosore.2012.11.4.167
  3. Heo, M., H.O. Ryu, and J.H. Song. 2008. Prepared non-regulated odor source management plan. Rearch Report. Korean Society of Odor Rearch and Engineering, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Higuchi, T., M. Ukita, M. Sekine, and T. Imai. 2007. A case study and recent improvements in odor management in Japan. Water Pract. 1(2):1-7.
  5. Jos Botermans, G.G., K.H. Jeppsson, N. Brown, and L. Rodhe. 2010. Measures to reduce ammonia emissions in pig production. Review. Landscape Horticulture Agriculture Reportsesries.
  6. Jung, J.O. and Y.J. Jung. 2016. Industrial wastewater treatment containing high concentration of ammonia with low energy micro-bubble reactor. J. Wetlands Res. 18(3):286-291. https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2016.18.3.286
  7. Kim, Y.J., J.O. Jung, and Y.J. Jung. 2015a. Complex mal-odor treatment of foodwaste with micro-bubble generated from enhanced wet scrubber. J. Environ. Sci. Int. 24(1):73-79. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2015.24.1.73
  8. Kim, Y.J., J.O. Jung, and Y.J. Jung. 2015b. Hydrochloric acid gas removal from iron and steel industry using micro-bubbles of a dip injection wet scrubber system. J. Wetlands Res. 17(1):75-79. https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2015.17.1.075
  9. Lemay, S.P. 1999. Barn management and control of odours. Adv. Pork Prod. 10:81-91.
  10. Lin, H., X. Wu, C. Miller, J. Zhu, L.J. Hadlocon, R. Manuzon, and L. Zhao. 2014. Pilot‐scale field study for ammonia removal from lagoon biogas using an acid wet scrubber. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B 49(6):439-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2014.894781
  11. Melse, R. and N. Ogink. 2005. Air scrubbing techniques for ammonia and odor reduction at livestock operations: Review of on-farm research in the Netherlands. Trans. ASAE. 48(6):2303-2313. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20094
  12. National Institue of Animal Science. 2015. Techniques and best practices for reducing the odor of pig farms.
  13. Park, W.K., N.B. Park, J.D. Shin, S.G. Hong, S.I. Kwon, and K.K. Kang. 2011. Study on characteristics of biogas production and liquid fertilizer with anaerobic co digestion of livestock manure and food waste. Korean J Soil Sci Fert. 44(5):895-902. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.5.895