과학교육연구지 (Journal of Science Education)

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.405-425
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-3944(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-4074(eISSN)
경북대학교 과학교육연구소 (Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학자의 창의적 문제해결을 통한 발명교육의 시사점 탐색: 로버트 후크를 중심으로

Implications for invention education through the analysis of creative problem solving by Robert Hooke

  • 투고 : 2017.10.17
  • 심사 : 2017.12.20
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 과학혁명 시기의 창의적 과학자 중 한 명인 Hooke의 생애와 업적을 통해, 오늘날 과학교육에서의 발명교육에 대한 시사점을 제시하고자 하였다. 이에 Hooke에 의해 출간된 저서와 논문을 중심으로 그의 업적과 창의적 문제해결 과정을 통해 나타나는 특징을 범주화하고 영향을 미친 배경이 무엇인지 논의하였다. 연구 결과, Hooke는 일상적 맥락에서 관찰가능하고 통용되는 사실을 기반으로 과학적 추론을 시도하였으며, 실제 관찰과 탐구에 필요한 다양한 도구와 방법들을 직접 제작하고 이를 적극적으로 활용하였다. 다른 과학자들과 구분되는 Hooke의 발명에 관한 천재성은 호기심을 자극할 수 있는 주변 환경과 그의 예술적 재주, 그리고 다양한 분야에 대한 관심을 이끈 스승과 동료들이 있었기에 가능했다. 또한 과학적 이론과 관찰 가능한 실재 사이의 일원론적인 세계관을 지지함으로써 실물 및 도구의 제작을 통한 이론의 창안을 시도하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 이를 토대로 오늘날 과학교육에서 발명교육을 연계한 실천방안과 시사점을 제시하였다.

This study aimed to investigate the life and works of Robert Hooke, an ingenious scientist in the era of scientific revolution, and to give some implications of invention education for science education. The publications and critics of Robert Hooke were analyzed to find out the personal setbacks how he showed excellent performances across the fields of science. The research finding showed that he tried to make geometric and visualized reasoning based on the empirical phenomenon, had much interest in the devices and methods for measurement and observation in the experiment, and made technical devices by himself. The ingenuity of Robert Hooke could be revealed by the rich resources in his childhood, his talent of drawing for depiction, and his colleagues and teachers with favors of diverse fields of disciplines and empirical tradition. As well, it was likely that his monistic viewpoint between the reality and scientific theories, led himself to develop interesting instruments for scientific experiments. Thus, this study suggested some implications to combine invention education with science education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baigrie, B. S. (2006). Electricity and magnetism: a historical perspective. London, England: Greenwood.
  2. Bennett, J., Cooper, M., Hunter, M., & Jardine, L. (2003). London's Leonardo: the life and work of Robert Hooke. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  3. Boas, M. (2015). Robert Boyle and seventeenthcentury chemistry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Buchwald, J. Z. (2012). Newton and the origin of civilization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. Butterfield, H. (1957). The origins of modern science, 1300-1800. New York, NY: Free Press.
  6. Chapman, A. (2005). England's Leonardo: Robert Hooke and the seventeenth-century scientific revolution. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  7. Cho, J., & Choi, Y. (2009). Image of inventions of secondary science and technology teachers. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 9(2), 152-173.
  8. Choi, H., Kim, S., & Park, J. (2015). Design proposal for developing an ICT convergent block kit that supports STEAM education: focused on the block shape and method for building forms. Design Convergence Study, 14(5), 57-70.
  9. Choi, Y. H., Kim, Y. I., Kim, K. S., Kim, K. Y., Kim, S. I., Kim, H. P., Moon, D. Y., Park, G. Y., Lee, K. N., Lee, S. W., Lee, J. H., Jeong, J. H., & Whang, M. J. (2013). A study on the validation of subject teaching standard system for invention teachers. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 26(1), 157-177.
  10. Cooper, M., & Hunter, M. (Eds.). (2006). Robert Hooke: tercentennial studies. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
  11. Curriculum Standing Committee of National Education Professional Association [CSCNEPA]. (2007). Developing a 21st century school curriculum for all Australian students. Retrieved from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/CSCNEPA_paper_June087.pdf
  12. Cushing, J. T. (1998). Philosophical concepts in physics: the historical relation between philosophy and scientific theories. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Department for Education [DfE]. (2014). The national curriculum in England-Framework document. London, England: Author.
  14. Dupre, S. (2008). Newton’s telescope in print: the role of images in the reception of Newton’s instrument. Perspectives on Science, 16(4), 328-359. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.2008.16.4.328
  15. Espinasse, M. (1962). Robert Hooke. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  16. Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners’ knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900290000
  17. Goldberg, F. M., & McDermott, L. C. (1987). An investigation of student understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or concave mirror. American Journal of Physics, 55(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15254
  18. Gunther, R. T. (Ed.) (1931). Early science in Oxford: the cutler lectures of Robert Hooke. London, England: Dawsons of Pall Mall.
  19. Harman, P. M. (1982). Energy, force and matter: the conceptual development of nineteenth-century physics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Heilbron, J. L. (2010). Galileo. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  21. Helden, A. V. (1968). Christopher Wren's 'De Corpore Saturni'. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 23(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.1968.0023
  22. History of the Microscope. (2017). Microscope history: Robert Hooke (1635-1703). Retrieved from http://www.history-of-the-microscope.org/images/Robert-Hooke-early-microscope1.jpg
  23. Hong, G., & Sim, J. (2013). A study of STEAM education for elementary science subject with robots. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 17(1), 83-91.
  24. Hooke, R. (1665). A method, by which a glass of a small plano-convex sphere may be made to refract the rayes of light to a focus of a far greater distance, than is usual. Philosophical Transactions, 1(1-22), 202-203. doi:10.1098/rstl.1665.0088
  25. Hooke, R. (1676). A description of helioscopes and some other instrument. London, England: Printed by T. R. for John Martyn.
  26. Hooke, R. (1677). Lampas, or, Descriptions of some mechanical improvements of lamps & waterpoises: Together with some other physical and mechanical discoveries (Early English books online). London, England: Printed for John Martyn.
  27. Hooke, R., Papin, Denis, Young, James, Sturmy, Samuel, & G. T. (1678). Lectures de potentia restitutiva, or, Of spring: Explaining the power of springing bodies : To which are added some collections viz. a description of Dr. Pappins wind-fountain and force-pump, Mr. Young's observation concerning natural fountains, some other considerations concerning that subject, Captain Sturmy's remarks of a subterraneous cave and cistern, Mr. G.T. observations made on the Pike of Teneriff, 1674, some reflections and conjectures occasioned thereupon, a relation of a late eruption in the Isle of Palma (Early English books online). London: Printed for John Martyn.
  28. Hooke, R. (1705). Posthumous works of Dr. Robert Hooke containing his cutlerian lectures, and other discourses (R. Waller Ed.). London, England: Royal Society.
  29. Hooke, R. (1961). Micrographia: or some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses, with observations and inquiries thereupon. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1665)
  30. Hunter, M., & Schaffer, S. (1989). Robert Hooke: new studies. Suffolk, England: The Boydell Press.
  31. Hyun, D., & Jho, H. (2015). Proposal of experimental apparatus for learning about torque. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 65(12), 1209-1222. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.65.1209
  32. Hyun, D., Shin, A., & Kim, D. (2016). Development of a transparent screen for observing images and its characteristics. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 66(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.66.72
  33. Hyun, D., & Jho, H. (2017). An analysis of experiments related to electrostatics in secondary school textbooks and a proposal of experiments for better understanding of electrostatics. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 67(10), 975-990. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.67.975
  34. Jang, S.-J., & Kim, S.-H. (2012). An experiment on Faraday’s law of induction by using an MBL. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 62(6), 612-617. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.62.612
  35. Jardine, L. (2004). The curious life of Robert Hooke: the man who measured London. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  36. Jeong, D.-H., Kim, K.-T., & Moon, D.-Y. (2016). Analysis of importance and performance on creative thinking technique of in-service and pre-service elementary school teachers. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 29(2), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.20954/jkpae.2016.06.29.2.93
  37. Jho, H. (2014a). Implications of science education as interdisciplinary education through the cases of scientists and artists in the modern era: focus on the relationship between science and the arts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 755-765. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0755
  38. Jho, H. (2014b). Textbook analysis of visual representations about science concepts related to electric circuits. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 64(12), 1162-1171. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.64.1162
  39. Jho, H. (2015). Analysis of electricity and magnetism presented in middle-school textbooks from the perspective of the history of science. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 65(10), 982-993. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.65.982
  40. Jho, H. (2017). The changes of higher education and the tasks of general education according to the fourth industrial revolution. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(2), 53-89.
  41. Jung, J. (2015). A study on the appropriateness of contents in ‘technology and invention’ unit in ‘technology.home economics’ textbooks per 2009 revised curriculum. The Journal of Practical Arts Education, 21(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2015.21.1.75
  42. Kang, I., & Kim, M. (2017). Exploring educational effects of maker activity in an elementary school class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(14), 487-515. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.14.487
  43. Kim, J.-S. (2016). Elementary school pre-service teachers’ perception and educational needs toward invention education. The Journal of Practical Arts Education, 28(2), 189-206.
  44. Kim, T., & Jo, H.-J. (2012). An analysis of teachers’ educational needs on ‘introductory of invention and patent’ in invention education. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 31(2), 315-338.
  45. Kim, Y. (2014). Educational needs analysis of job competencies for elementary invention teachers. Journal of Practical Arts Education, 27(1), 201-218.
  46. Kim, Y., Seo, H.-A., & Park, J. (2013). An analysis on problem-finding patterns of well-known creative scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1285-1299. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1285
  47. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions with an introductory essay by Ian Hacking. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  48. Lawson, I. (2016). Crafting the microworld.: how Robert Hooke constructed knowledge about small things. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 70, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2015.0057
  49. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
  50. Lee, B., Shim, K.-C., & Kim, H.-B. (2017). Perception of science educators about invention education in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0017
  51. Lee, B., Son, J., Park, J., Lee, K., Jho, H., Son, M., Jeon, H., Lee, Y., Lee, K., Park, M., & Kim, M. (2014). A study on the encouragement of invention and intellectual property education in science (gifted) education. Seoul: Korean Intellectual Property Office.
  52. Lee, C., & Seo, W. (2012). The development and application of creative design education program based on integrative STEAM on through making automata. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 67-91.
  53. Lee, J., Park, K., Jin, S., Chun, M., Ryu, J., Lee, H., Lee, Y., & Lee, K. (2014). Teachers’ perception on differentiation of gifted education in invention from gifted education in science. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(4), 597-612. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.4.597
  54. Lee, S., & Oh, W. (2017). Middle school students’ metacognition in the arduino-based speed-measuring algorithm development process. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 67(9), 1115-1123. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.67.1115
  55. Lee, S., & Sohn, S. (2017). Analysis of the motion of a pendulum by using Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 67(3), 388-397. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.67.388
  56. Lee, Y.-C., & Kim, H.-P. (2017). Analysis of invention education contents reflected to elementary school textbooks. The Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(1), 79-95.
  57. Lee, Y. J. (2015). The validation for developing contents system of invention education. The Journal of Practical Arts Education, 21(4), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2015.21.1.161
  58. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2013). Science syllabus primary 2014. Singapore, Singapore: Curriculum Planning & Development Division.
  59. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015). The 2015 revised Korean national science curriculum. No. 2015-74. Sejong, Korea: Author.
  60. Ministry of Education Science and Technology [MEST]. (2011). National Science Curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Author.
  61. Moon, C. (2016). Introduction to physics experiment. Seoul, Korea: Chungmungak.
  62. Navarro, J. (2012). A history of the electron. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  63. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  64. Newton, I. (1952). Optics: or a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflexions & colours of light. Mineola, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1704)
  65. Newton, I. (1999). The Principia : mathematical principles of natural philosophy. (I. B. Cohen and A. Whitman, Trans). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  66. Newton, I., & Cassegrain, M. (1672). Mr. Isaac Newton's Considerations upon Part of a Letter of Monsuur de Berce Printed in the Eight French Memoire, Concerning the Cata-Drioptrical Telescope, Pretended to be Improv'd and Refined by M. Cassegrain. Philosophical Transactions (1665-1678), 7, 4056-4059. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1672.0018
  67. Park, W., & Park, I.-W. (2015). Development of an elementary invention program on the basis of fabricating activity for a simple gravimeter and its application to science class. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 26(1), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.26.1.201503.175
  68. Patterson, L. D. (1948). Robert Hooke and the conservation of energy. Isis, 38(3/4), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1086/348066
  69. Pedretti, C. (2004). Leonardo: art and science. Cobham, England: TAJ Books.
  70. Rienitz, J. (1975). Schlieren experiment 300 years ago. Nature, 254, 293-294. https://doi.org/10.1038/254293a0
  71. Ryu, C.-G., & Lee, C.-H. (2012). Effects that scratch programming has on creative problem-solving for gifted elementary students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 25(1), 149-169.
  72. Seo, H., Son, J., Lee, B., Jeong, H., & Maeng, H. (2006). Content standards for invention education: Introduction. Seoul, Korea: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  73. Settles, G. S. (2001). Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques: visualizing phenomena in transparent media. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  74. Shapin, S. (1998). The scientific revolution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  75. Sim, J., Lee, Y., Kim, H. (2015). Understanding STEM, STEAM education, and addressing the issues facing STEAM in the Korean context. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 709-723. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0709
  76. Son, J., & Lee, B. (2017). Analysis of relevance of Korean and foreign science curricula and invention. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 651-658. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.4.651
  77. Song, S. (1988). A Re-evaluation of Robert Hooke. The Korean Historical Review, 120, 41-56.
  78. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2017). Descartes' physics. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes-physics/
  79. Wikipedia. (2017a). Johannes Hevelius. Retrieved from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9a/Houghton_Typ_620.73.451_-_Johannes_Hevelius%2C_Machinae_coelestis%2C_1673.jpg
  80. Wikipedia. (2017b). William Gascoigne. Retrieved from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/Gascoigne%27s_micrometer_as_drawn_by_Robert_Hooke.JPG/800px-Gascoigne%27s_micrometer_as_drawn_by_Robert_Hooke.JPG