DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors affecting millennials' intentions to use social commerce in fashion shopping

  • Bounkhong, Tiffany (School of Human Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas) ;
  • Cho, Eunjoo (School of Human Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas)
  • Received : 2017.10.16
  • Accepted : 2017.12.16
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Social media has become an integral part of consumers' daily lives. Individuals connect with one another on social networking sites to like, share, and post information and experiences. As social media become popular among millennials, a growing number of fashion retailers use social media networks in the context of online commerce transactions. Accordingly, an increased number of fashion retailers has been using social media as an advertising tool and a retail channel. Despite the popularity of social media among millennials, empirical findings are limited to reveal factors associated with young consumers' intentions to use social commerce in fashion shopping. This study sought to examine factors affecting millennials' intentions to use social commerce in fashion shopping by adopting the technology acceptance model. A total of 524 college students completed an online survey in the U.S. The results of structural equation model confirmed that perceived ease of use, usefulness, and enjoyment had a positive impact on millennials' attitudes and intentions toward fashion shopping in social commerce. While both perceived ease of use and usefulness positively influenced enjoyment, usefulness had a stronger impact than ease of use. Compared to usefulness, enjoyment had much stronger impact on attitudes. Further structural model analysis revealed a direct, positive influence of perceived usefulness of social commerce on perceived enjoyment of social commerce, which has not been explored in prior studies. These findings provide theoretical and managerial implications.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, K. C., Knight, D. K., Pookulangara, S., & Josiam, B. (2014). Influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on retailer loyalty and purchase intention: A Facebook perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5). 773-779. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.05.007
  2. Bolton, R. N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Loureiro, Y. K., & Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding generation Y and their use of social media: A review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), 245-267. doi:10.1108/09564231311326987
  3. Cheema, U., Rizwan, M., Jalal, R., Durrani, F., & Sohail, N. (2013). The trend of online shopping in 21st century: Impact of enjoyment in TAM model. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 3(2), 131-141.
  4. Chen, L.-D., Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), 705-719. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00127-6
  5. Chen, L.-D., & Tan, J. (2004). Technology adaptation in E-commerce: Key determinants of virtual stores acceptance. European Management Journal, 22(1), 74-86. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2003.11.014
  6. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
  7. Cho, H., & Fiorito, S. S. (2009). Acceptance of online customization for apparel shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(5), 389-407. doi:10.1108/09590550910954892
  8. Constine, J. (2016, November 1). Instagram tests shoppable photo tags. TechCrunch, Retrieved April 11, 2017, from https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/01/instagram-shoppable-photos
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
  10. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-487. doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022
  11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  12. eMarketer. (2015, September 8). College students still spend most social time with Facebook. eMarketer, Retrieved November 22, 2016, from https://www.emarketer.com/Article/College-Students-Still-Spend-Most-Social-Time-with-Facebook/1012955
  13. eMarketer. (2016, October 13). Marketers say 'more' to search, mobile, Facebook. eMarketer, Retrieved October 11, 2016, from https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Marketers-Say-More-Search-Mobile-Facebook/1014593
  14. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior (8th ed.). Orlando, FL: Dryden Press.
  15. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312
  17. Godey, B., Manthiou, A., Pederzoli, D., Rokka, J., Aiello, G., Donvito, R., & Singh, R. (2016). Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand equity and consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5833-5841. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.181
  18. Goodman, L. M. (2015, May 27). Millennial college graduates: Young, educated, jobless. Newsweek, Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://www.newsweek.com/2015/06/05/millennial-college-graduates-young-educated-jobless-335821.html
  19. Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009). Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 565-571. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.016
  20. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  21. Hajli, N., Sims, J., Zadeh, A. H., & Richard, M.-O. (2017). A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 71, 133-141. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.004
  22. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  23. Hwang, C., Chung, T.-L., & Sanders, E. A. (2016). Attitudes and purchase intentions for smart clothing: Examining U.S. consumers' functional, expressive, and aesthetic needs for solar-powered clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 34(3), 207-222. doi:10.1177/0887302X16646447
  24. Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2012). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480-1486. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.014
  25. Kim, J., Ma, Y. J., & Park, J. (2009). Are US consumers ready to adopt mobile technology for fashion goods?: An integrated theoretical approach. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 215-230. doi:10.1108/13612020910957725
  26. Kim, J. B. (2012). An empirical study on consumer first purchase intention in online shopping: Integrating initial trust and TAM. Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 125-150. doi:10.1007/s10660-012-9089-5
  27. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  28. Ko, A., & Kim, S. (2014). A study on fashion brand's SNS marketing: Based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 22(6), 1011-1027. doi:10.7741/rjcc.2014.22.6.1011
  29. Ko, E., Kim, E. Y., & Lee, E. K. (2009). Modeling consumer adoption of mobile shopping for fashion products in Korea. Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), 669-687. doi:10.1002/mar.20294
  30. Kwon, H. S., & Chidambaram, L. (2000, January). A test of the technology acceptance model: The case of cellular telephone adoption. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI. Retrieved November 24, 2016, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cb2c/90f352489ce3bf26ae582483c893f9645d5c.pdf
  31. Lee, H.-H., Fiore, A. M., & Kim, J. (2006). The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(8), 621-644. doi:10.1108/09590550610675949
  32. Liu, S.-P., Tucker, D., Koh, C. E., & Kappelman, L. (2003). Standard user interface in e-commerce sites. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(8), 600-610. doi:10.1108/02635570310497648
  33. Menon, R. G. V., Sigurdsson, V., Larsen, N. M., Fagerstrom, A., & Foxall, G. R. (2016). Consumer attention to price in social commerce: Eye tracking patterns in retail clothing. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5008-5013. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.072
  34. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide. (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
  35. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Thorbjornsen, H. (2005). Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, 33(3), 330-346. doi:10.1177/0092070305276149
  36. O'Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003). Web retailing adoption: Exploring the nature of internet users Web retailing behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10(2), 81-94. doi:10.1016/S0969-6989(02)00004-8
  37. Park, J., & Kim, J. (2007). The importance of perceived consumption delay in Internet shopping: Time-related information, time risk, attitude, and purchase intention. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 25(1), 24-41. doi:10.1177/0887302X06296869
  38. Saleh, K. (2014, August 15). US social commerce: Statistics and trends [Blog Post]. Retrevied November 29, 2017, from https://www.invespcro.com/blog/us-social-commerce
  39. Solomon, M. (2015, January 21). The millennial customer has $200 billion to spend (but wants a new style of customer service). Forbes, Retrevied April 7, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/micahsolomon/2015/01/21/the-millennial-customer-hasarrived-has-200-billion-to-spend-and-wants-a-newstyle-of-customer-service/#2349cf1d3e29
  40. Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66. doi:10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
  41. Statista. (2016a). U.S. Millennials: Internet usage and online shopping. Retreived October 11, 2016, from https://www.statista.com/topics/2576/us-millennials-internet-usage-and-online-shopping
  42. Statista. (2016b). U.S. Millennials: Social network users 2012-2018. Retrieved October 11, 2016, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/372650/us-millennial-social-network-users
  43. Stelzner, M. A. (2015). 2015 Social media marketing industry report: How marketers are using social media to grow their businesses. Retrieved November 20, 2016, from https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/SocialMediaMarketingIndustryReport2015.pdf
  44. Tong, X. (2010). A cross-national investigation of an extended technology acceptance model in the online shopping context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(10), 742-759. doi: 10.1108/09590551011076524
  45. Touchette, B., Schanski, M., & Lee, S.-E. (2015). Apparel brands' use of Facebook: An exploratory content analysis of branded entertainment. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 107-119. doi:10.1108/JFMM-04-2013-0051
  46. Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004). Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: The case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 41(6), 747-762. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011
  47. Wakefield, K. L., & Baker, J. (1998). Excitement at the mall: Determinants and effects on shopping response. Journal of Retailing, 74(4), 515-539. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80106-7
  48. Yang, K. (2012). Consumer technology traits in determining mobile shopping adoption: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(5), 484-491. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.06.003
  49. Yoh, E., Damhorst, M. L., Sapp, S., & Laczniak, R. (2003). Consumer adoption of the Internet: The case of apparel shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 20(12), 1095-1118. doi:10.1002/mar.10110
  50. Yu, U.-J., & Park, J. (2014). Consumers' virtual product experiences and risk perceptions of product performance in the online co-design practice: A case of NIKEiD. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 43(1), 29-46. doi:10.1111/fcsr.12079
  51. Yuksel, M., Milne, G. R., & Miller, E. G. (2016). Social media as complementary consumption: The relationship between consumer empowerment and social interactions in experiential and informative contexts. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(2), 111-123. doi:10.1108/JCM-04-2015-1396

Cited by

  1. The effect of social connectedness on consumer adoption of social commerce in apparel shopping vol.6, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-019-0171-7
  2. AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF STUDENT’S ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE ADOPTION OF MOBILE SHOPPING WITH MILLENNIALS vol.8, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8244
  3. 리테일 서비스 로봇의 소비자 수용에 관한 연구 vol.28, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2020.28.4.409