DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of growth performance of crossbred Korean native chickens for twelve weeks after hatching

  • Cho, Hyun Min (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Wickramasuriya, Samiru Sudharaka (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Shin, Taeg Kyun (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Eunjoo (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Heo, Jung Min (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yi, Young-Joo (Division of Biotechnology, Safety, Environment and Life Science Institute, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2017.08.14
  • Accepted : 2017.10.18
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the growth performance, viability, and uniformity of female crossbred Korean native chickens (KNC) for the first twelve weeks after hatching. Six crossbreed lines of chickens (1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B, and 6B) bred from 1 paternal line and 6 maternal lines of KNC were compared in this study. Sixty newly hatched 1-day old chicks from each crossbreed, for a total of 360 chickens, were allocated into 6 replicates (10 birds per replicate) in a complete randomized design. Experimental diets used in this study consisted of 3 phases: 1) week 0 to 5, crude protein 20.3% and metabolizable energy 3,059 kcal/kg; 2) week 5 to 8, crude protein 18.6% and metabolizable energy 3,123 kcal/kg; and 3) week 8 to 12, crude protein 16.7% and metabolizable energy 3,187 kcal/kg. Body weight and feed intake were measured bi-weekly during the experiment. The 4B crossbreed had a higher body weight, average daily gain, and average daily feed intake on week 12 (p < 0.05) than the other groups. The 4B crossbreed had a lower (p < 0.05) uniformity during weeks 10 to 12 than crossbreeds 1B and 5B. However, a lower viability was observed (p > 0.05) in 4B in weeks 2 to 12 than those in the other groups. Results of the current study indicate that the 4B crossbreed had a higher growth performance in week 12 but had a lower viability for weeks 2 to 12 than the other crossbreeds.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn DH, Park SY. 2002. Studies on components related to taste such as free amino acids and nucleotides in Korean native chicken meat. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 31:547-552. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2002.31.4.547
  2. Behre ET, Gous RM. 2008. Effect of dietary protein content on growth, uniformity and mortality of two commercial broiler strains. South African Journal of Animal Science 38:293-302.
  3. Blanchard SM, Degernes LA, DeWolf Jr DK, Garlich JD. 2002. Intermittent biotelemetric monitoring of electrocardiograms and temperature in male broilers at risk for sudden death syndrome. Poultry Science 81:887-891. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.887
  4. Cha JB, Hong EC, Kim SH, Kim CD, Heo KN, Choo HJ, Oh KS, Kang BS. 2016. Economic performance test of commercial chickens (CC) crossbred with parent stock (PS) of Korean native chicken (KNC). Korean Journal of Poultry Science 43:207-212. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.4.207
  5. Cho JH, Um JS, Yu MS, Paik IK. 2007. Effect of ME and crude protein content of diet on the performance and production cost of white semibroiler chickens. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 34:53-56. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2007.34.1.053
  6. Choe JH, Nam KC, Jung S, Kim BN, Yun HJ, Jo CR. 2010. Differences in the quality characteristics between commercial Korean native chickens and broilers. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 30:13-19. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.1.13
  7. Fortun-Lamothe L, Lamboley Gauzere B, Bannelier C. 2002. Prediction of body composition in rabbit females using total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC). Livestock Production Science 78:133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00087-8
  8. HwangBo J, Hong EC, Chung IB, Kang KH, Park HD, Suh OS, Chung WT, Jang SK. 2009. A study on the amount and major compositions of excreta from broilers. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 36:157-163. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.2.157
  9. Imeada N. 2000. Influence of the stocking density and rearing season on incidence of sudden death syndrome in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79:201-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.2.201
  10. Kang B, Hong E, Kim H, Yu D, Park M, Seo B, Choo H, Na S, Seo O, HwangBo J. 2010. Hatching and growing performance of three-way crossbreds of Korean native chickens (KNC). Korean Journal of Poultry Science 37:399-404. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2010.37.4.399
  11. Kang BS, Cheong IC, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ohh BK, Choi KS. 1997a. Estimation of heterosis for some economic traits in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and rhode island red-I. Hatching and growing performance in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and rhode island red. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 24:117-126.
  12. Kang BS, Cheong IC, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ohh BK, Choi KS. 1997b. Estimation of heterosis for some economic traits in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and rhode island red-II. Laying performance of Korean native chicken and rhode island red crossbreds. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 24:127-137.
  13. Kang BS, Kim JD, Jung IJ, Jung SB, Yang CB. 1992. Studies on the production of high quality meat with traditional chicken hybrids. Livestock Experiment Station Test Report 376-383. [in Korean]
  14. Kim YS, Byun MJ, Suh SW, Kim JH, Cho CY, Park SB, Ko YG, Lee JW, Choi SB. 2014. Comparison of growth performance at rearing stage between Korean native chicken and imported chickens. Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 26:568-573. https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.4.568
  15. Mench JA. 2002. Broiler breeders: Feed restriction and welfare. World's Poultry Science Journal 58: 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20020004
  16. Na JC, Lee SJ, Kang BS, Seo OS, Kim SS, Park JC. 1992. Study on level of feeding for chickens of meat quality. pp. 411-421. Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science.
  17. National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS). 2008. Korean native chicken certification standard institution research. [in Korean]
  18. National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS). 2012. Korean feeding standard for poultry. [in Korean]
  19. Ryu KS, Song GS. 1999. Effect of feeding Angelica gigas by-products on performance and meat quality of Korean native chicks. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 26:261-265.
  20. Shin TK, Wickramasuriya SS, Kim E, Cho HM, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2017. Comparative study of growth performances of six different Korean native chicken crossbreeds from hatch to twelve weeks of age. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:244-253.
  21. Tolkamp BJ, Sandilands V, Kyriazakis I. 2005. Effects of qualitative feed restriction during rearing on the performance of broiler breeders during rearing and lay. Poultry Science 84:1286-1293. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1286
  22. Yoo J, Koo B, Kim E, Heo JM. 2015. Comparison of growth performance between crossbred Korean native chickens for hatch to 28 days. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 42:23-27. https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.1.023

Cited by

  1. Effect of natural mineral complex on egg quality, egg production and hatchability in laying hens during the summer season vol.45, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20180035
  2. Comparison of the performance of the laying period of crossbred Korean native chickens from 20 to 40 weeks of age vol.45, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20180063
  3. Comparison of the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microflora, blood profiles, and meat quality of broilers, Korean native chickens and white semi broilers under an identical breeding vol.46, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20190022
  4. Determination and comparison of growth performance parameters between two crossbred strains of Korean native chickens with a white semi broiler chicken for 84 days post-hatch vol.47, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200016