정신신체의학 (Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine)

한국정신신체의학회 (Korean Psychosomatic Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다면적 인성검사 II를 이용한 성폭행과 성추행 피해자의 심리적 특성 비교

A Comparison of Psychological Characteristics between Sexually Assaulted and Molested Victims Using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2

  • 이상민 (인제대학교 의과대학 부산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 김성진 (인제대학교 의과대학 부산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 정도운 (인제대학교 의과대학 부산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 강제욱 (인제대학교 의과대학 부산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 문정준 (인제대학교 의과대학 부산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 전동욱 (인제대학교 의과대학 부산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 이윤호 (인제대학교 의과대학 부산백병원 정신건강의학교실) ;
  • 김유나 (인제대학교 의과대학 부산백병원 정신건강의학교실)
  • Lee, Sang-Min (Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Jin (Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Do-Un (Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Je-Wook (Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Jung-Joon (Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeon, Dong-Wook (Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Yoon-Ho (Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, You-Na (Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.08
  • 심사 : 2017.10.18
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적 본 연구는 다면적 인성검사 II를 이용해 성추행 피해자와 성폭행 피해자의 심리적 후유증을 비교 분석하였다. 방 법 피해 경험 후 6개월 이내에 부산 스마일센터를 내방한 성인 여성 성폭력 피해자를 대상으로 분석을 시행하였다. 피해 성폭력의 유형을 분류하고 인구사회학적 특성 및 피해 사건의 특성 요인을 파악했다. 성폭행과 성추행 피해자 집단 사이의 다면적 인성검사 II 결과를 비교하기 위해 독립표본 T 검정을 통해 척도별 집단 비교를 하였고, 카이제곱 검정을 통해 각 척도에서 65점 이상의 높은 점수를 나타낸 대상자의 빈도 차이를 분석하였다. 결 과 총 55명 중 성폭행 피해자는 32명, 성추행 피해자는 23명이었다. F, F(B), F(P), Pt, Sc, Ma, RC6, PSYC 척도에서 두 집단 간 차이가 유의한 결과가 나타났다. 또한 Pa, Pt, Sc, RC6, PSYC 척도에서 성폭행 피해자 집단이 성추행 피해자 집단에 비해 높은 점수를 보이는 대상자 수가 유의하게 많았다. 결 론 두 집단 모두에서 피해 경험 이후 중등도 이상의 우울과 불안을 경험하며, 특히 성폭행 피해자 집단은 성추행 피해자 집단에 비해 더 큰 혼란과 심리적 고통을 경험하는 것으로 확인되었다.

Objectives : This study analyzed psychological aftereffects and made comparisons between victims who were either sexually assaulted or molested using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2(MMPI-2). Methods : The participants were adult women who visited the Busan Smile Center within 6 months following sexual assault. This study categorized the participants according to types of sexual violence and then identified their social demographic features and characteristics. Student's t-tests were carried out to compare the MMPI-2 results between the sexually assaulted group and sexually molested group. Chi-square tests were also conducted to compare between participants who scored above 65T. Results : Among the 55 participants, 32 were sexually assaulted; 23 were sexually molested. Significant differences between the two groups were found in the following scales: F, F(B), F(P), Pt, Sc, Ma, RC6 and PSYC. Moreover, the number of participants with higher scores in the Pa, Pt, Sc, RC6, and PSYC scales in the sexually assaulted group was significantly higher than in the sexually molested group. Conclusions : Both groups of victims may commonly suffer beyond the moderate level of depression and anxiety in the post-case term. In addition, the sexually assaulted group seems to suffer relatively more from panic and psychological pain than the sexually molested group does.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Basile K, Smith S, Breiding M, Blac M, Mahendra R. Sexual violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control: Atlanta;2014. p.11-12.
  2. Son Y. The medicolegal understanding regarding sexual violence. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:681-690.
  3. 경찰청. 2015 범죄통계;2016. p.44, 70-88.
  4. 여성가족부. 2016년 전국 성폭력 실태조사 결과보고서;2017. p.17-19.
  5. Mason F, Lodrick Z. Psychological consequences of sexual assault. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013;27:27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.015
  6. Chen LP, Murad MH, Paras ML, Colbenson KM, Sattler AL, Goranson EN, Elamin MB, Seime RJ, Shinozaki G, Prokop LJ, Zirakzadeh A. Sexual abuse and lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:618-629. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2009.0583
  7. Mushtaq M, Sultana S, Imtiaz I. The Trauma of Sexual Harassment and its Mental Health Consequences Among Nurses. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015;25:675-679.
  8. Murdoch M, Polusny MA, Hodges J, Cowper D. The association between in-service sexual harassment and post-traumatic stress disorder among Department of Veterans Affairs disability applicants. Mil Med 2006;171:166-173. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.171.2.166
  9. Kwon HK, Park K. The Validation Study of the Sexual Abuse Long-term Impact Scale. Kor J Clin Psychol 2003;8:15-33.
  10. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham JR, Tellegen A, Kaemmer B. Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An administrative and interpretive guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1989.
  11. Tsai M, Feldman-Summers S, Edgar M. Childhood molestation: variables related to differential impacts on psychosexual functioning in adult women. J Abnorm Psychol 1979;88:407-417. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.88.4.407
  12. Scott RL, Stone DA. MMPI measures of psychological disturbance in adolescent and adult victims of father-daughter incest. J Clin Psychol 1986;42:251-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198603)42:2<251::AID-JCLP2270420205>3.0.CO;2-U
  13. Forbey JD, Ben-Porath YS, Davis DL. A comparison of sexually abused and non-sexually abused adolescents in a clinical treatment facility using the MMPI-A. Child Abuse Negl 2000;24:557-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00111-3
  14. Kim JH, Do JA, Choi IC, Lim MH. MMPI Characteristics of the Victim of the Sexual Violence. Anxiety and Mood 2015;11:12-18.
  15. Buchanan RD. The development of the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory. J Hist Behav Sci 1994;30.
  16. Han KH, Lim JY, Min BB, Lee JH, Moon KJ, Kim ZS. Korean MMPI-2 Standardization Study. Kor J Clin Psychol 2006;25:533-564.
  17. Han KH, Lim JY, Hahn JW. The Use of Korean MMPI-2 with Korean Psychiatric Sample: Preliminary Investigation. Kor J Clin Psychol 2002;21:827-842.
  18. Yi SY, Jang EY. Empirical validity of MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical Scales in Psychiatric Patients. Kor J Clin Psychol 2011;30:871-887. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2011.30.4.003
  19. Kim JK, Kim ZS. Psychological Effects of Childhood Sexual Abuse. Kor J Clin Psychol 2000;19:747-769.
  20. 신현숙, 이해경, 이경성. 성폭력 가해 및 피해 경험에 따른 비행 청소년의 MMPI-A 프로파일 비교. 청소년학연구 2006;13:197-223.
  21. Kong S-W, Chae J-H, Lee J-H, Hahn S-W, Park E-J, Choi K-S. Measuring Symptom Exaggeration in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder using the MMPI-2 and the Personality Assessment Inventory Symptom Validity Scales. Anxiety and Mood 2012;8:22-30.
  22. Lucenko BA, Gold SN, Elhai JD, Russo SA, Swingle JM. Relations between coercive strategies and MMPI-2 scale elevations among women survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Trauma Stress 2000;13:169-177. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007785201112
  23. Elhai JD, Frueh BC, Gold PB, Gold SN, Hamner MB. Clinical presentations of posttraumatic stress disorder across trauma populations: a comparison of MMPI-2 profiles of combat veterans and adult survivors of child sexual abuse. J Nerv Ment Dis 2000;188:708-713. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-200010000-00010
  24. Wyatt GE, Guthrie D, Notgrass CM. Differential effects of women's child sexual abuse and subsequent sexual revictimization. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992;60:167-173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.60.2.167
  25. Browne A, Finkelhor D. Impact of child sexual abuse: a review of the research. Psychol Bull 1986;99:66-77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.66
  26. Meiselman KC. Personality characteristics of incest history psychotherapy patients: a research note. Arch Sex Behav 1980;9:195-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542245
  27. Gregg GR, Parks ED. Selected Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 scales for identifying women with a history of sexual abuse. J Nerv Ment Dis 1995;183:53-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199501000-00012
  28. Harkness AR, McNulty JL, Ben-Porath YS. The Personality Psychopathology Five(PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychol Assess 1995;7:104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.104
  29. Black CA, DeBlassie RR. Sexual abuse in male children and adolescents: indicators, effects, and treatments. Adolescence 1993;28:123-133.