DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

LES를 이용한 초음속 충돌제트의 피드백 메커니즘에 대한 수치해석 연구

Numerical Analysis on Feedback Mechanism of Supersonic Impinging Jet using LES

  • 투고 : 2017.10.31
  • 심사 : 2017.12.22
  • 발행 : 2017.12.30

초록

Steam jets ejected from a rupture zone of high energy pipes may cause damage to adjacent structures. This event could lead to more serious accidents in nuclear power plants. Therefore, to prevent serious accidents, high energy pipes of nuclear power plants are designed according to the ANSI / ANS 58.2 technical standard. However, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) has recently pointed out non-conservatism in existing high energy pipe fracture evaluation methods, and required the assessment of the unsteady load of the jet caused by a potential feedback mechanism as well as the impact range of steam jet, the jet impact loads and the blast wave effects at the initial breakage stage. The potential feedback mechanism refers to a phenomenon in which a vortex formed by impingement jets amplifies vortex itself and induces jet vibration in a shear layer. In this study, CFD methodology using the LES turbulence model is established and numerical analysis is carried out to evaluate the dynamic behavior of impingement jets and the potential feedback mechanism during jet impingement. Obtained results have been compared with an empirical correlation and experiment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim, W. T., Choi, C. R., Chang, Y. S., Jang, H., Oh, S. H. and Kim, S. H., 2015, "Development of jet loads and dynamic structural integrity evaluation method against high energy line break," 2015 KPVP Annual Conference, KPVP, Gimcheon, pp. 61-62.
  2. Choi, C. R., Oh, S. H., Choi, D. K., Kim, W. T., Chang, Y. S. and Kim, S. H., 2016, "CFD Analysis for Steam Jet Impingement Evaluation," Trans. of the KPVP, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 58-65.
  3. Wallis, G., 2004, The ANSI/ANS Standard 58.2-1988: Two Phase Jet Model.
  4. Ransom., V., 2004, Comments on GSI-191 Models for Debris Generation.
  5. NUREG-0800, 2007, Determination of Rupture Locations and Dynamics Effects Associated with the Postulated Rupture of Piping, Rev. 2, Standard Review Plan 3.6.2.
  6. Thurow, B., Samimy, M. and Lempert, W., 2002, "Structure of a supersonic impinging rectangular jet via real-time optical diagnostics," 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Fluid Dynamics and Co-located Conferences, St. Louis, AIAA 2002-2865.
  7. Tam, C. K. W. and Norum, T. D., 1992, "Impingement tones of large aspect ratio supersonic rectangular jets," AIAA J., Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 304-311. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10919
  8. Gojon, R., Bogey, C. and Marsden, O., "Large-eddy simulation of supersonic planar jets impinging on a flat plate at an angle of 60 to 90 degrees," 21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, Dallas, AIAA 2015-2209.
  9. Ho, C. M. and Nosseir, N. S., 1981, "Dynamics of an impinging jet. Part 1. The feedback phenomenon,"J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 105, pp. 119-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112081003133