Journal of Radiopharmaceuticals and Molecular Probes (대한방사성의약품학회지)

Korean Society of Radiopharmaceuticals and Molecular Probes (대한방사성의약품학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of filters and reconstruction method on Cu-64 PET image

  • Lee, Seonhwa (Division of RI convergence research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS)) ;
  • Kim, Jung min (Department of Bio-convergence Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jung Young (Division of RI convergence research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS)) ;
  • Kim, Jin Su (Division of RI convergence research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS))
  • Received : 2017.11.13
  • Accepted : 2017.12.20
  • Published : 2017.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To assess the effects of filter and reconstruction of Cu-64 PET data on Siemens scanner, the various reconstruction algorithm with various filters were assessed in terms of spatial resolution, non-uniformity (NU), recovery coefficient (RC), and spillover ratio (SOR). Image reconstruction was performed using filtered backprojection (FBP), 2D ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), 3D reprojection algorithm (3DRP), and maximum a posteriori algorithms (MAP). For the FBP reconstruction, ramp, butterworth, hamming, hanning, or parzen filters were used. Attenuation or scatter correction were performed to assess the effect of attenuation and scatter correction. Regarding spatial resolution, highest achievable volumetric resolution was $3.08mm^3$ at the center of FOV when MAP (${\beta}=0.1$) reconstruction method was used. SOR was below 4% for FBP when ramp, Hamming, Hanning, or Shepp-logan filter were used. The lowest NU (highest uniform) after attenuation & scatter correction was 5.39% when FBP (parzen filter) was used. Regarding RC, 0.9 < RC < 1.1 was obtained when OSEM (iteration: 10) was used when attenuation and scatter correction were applied. In this study, image quality of Cu-64 on Siemens Inveon PET was investigated. This data will helpful for the quantification of Cu-64 PET data.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi JY, Lyoo CH, Kim JS, Kim KM, Lee M, Ryu YH. Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry of [18F] Mefway in Humans. Mol Imaging Biol 2016;18:803-806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-0955-8
  2. Choi JY, Lyoo CH, Lee JH, Cho H, Kim KM, Kim JS. Ryu YH. Human Radiation Dosimetry of [(18)F] AV- 1451(T807) to Detect Tau Pathology. Mol Imaging Biol, 2016;18:479-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0924-7
  3. Bradshaw TJ, Voorbach MJ, Reuter DR, Giamis AM, Mudd SR, Beaver JD. Image quality of Zr-89 PET imaging in the Siemens microPET Focus 220 preclinical scanner. Mol Imaging Biol, 2016;18:377-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0903-z
  4. Yu AR, Kim HJ, Lim SM, Kim JS. Comparison of Imaging Characteristics of (124)I PET for Determination of Optimal Energy Window on the Siemens Inveon PET. Biomed Res Int, 2016;3067123.
  5. Yu AR, Kim JS. Effect of filters and reconstruction algorithms on I-124 PET in Siemens Inveon PET scanner. J Instrum, 2015;10:P10026-P10026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/10/10/P10026
  6. Yu AR, Kim JS, Kang JH, Lim SM. Comparison of reconstruction methods and quantitative accuracy in Siemens Inveon PET scanner. J Instrum, 2015;10:P04001-P04001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/10/04/P04001
  7. Lee YS, Kim JS, Kim JY, Kim BI, Lim SM, Kim HJ. Spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 on Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT. Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 2015;30:27-32. https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2014.1709
  8. Lee YS, Kim JS, Kim KM, Kang JH, Lim SM, Kim HJ. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med, 2014;28:340-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0815-z
  9. Jang SJ, Kim KI, Seo MJ, Kim BS, Kim EJ, Yoon DH, Lee YJ, Lee TS, An GI, Kang JH. Pre-clinical assessment of Cu- 64-NOTA-trastuzumab targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 for convergence radiopharmaceutical. J Nucl Med no. supplement 2 1378 2016;57.
  10. Bao Q, Newport D, Chen M, Stout DB, Chatziioannou AF. Performance evaluation of the inveon dedicated PET preclinical tomograph based on the NEMA NU-4 standards. J Nucl Med, 2009;50:401-408. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.056374
  11. Magota K, Kubo N, Kuge Y, Nishijima K, Zhao S, Tamaki N. Performance characterization of the Inveon preclinical small-animal PET/SPECT/CT system for multimodality imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2011;38:742-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1683-y
  12. Scodeller P. Hyaluronidase and other extracellular matrix degrading enzymes for cancer therapy: new uses and nanoformulations. J Carcinog Mutagen, 2014;5:1-5.
  13. Wang H, Ducournau C, Saydaminova K, Richter M, Yumul R, Ho M, Carter D, Zubieta C, Fender P, Lieber A. Intracellular Signaling and Desmoglein 2 Shedding Triggered by Human Adenoviruses Ad3, Ad14, and Ad14P1. J Virol, 2015;89:10841-10859. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01425-15