DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Value of X-ray Compared with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Traumatic Vertebral Fractures

  • Lee, Yang Woo (Department of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Jang, Jae Ho (Department of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Jin Joo (Department of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Lim, Yong Su (Department of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Hyun, Sung Youl (Department of Trauma, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Yang, Hyuk Jun (Department of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.22
  • 심사 : 2017.10.12
  • 발행 : 2017.12.30

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of X-rays in patients with acute traumatic vertebral fractures visiting the emergency department and to analyze the diagnostic value of X-rays for each spine level. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed basal characteristics by reviewing medical records of 363 patients with adult traumatic vertebral fractures, admitted to the emergency center from March 1, 2014 to February 28, 2017. We analyzed spine X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to determine distribution according to the vertebral level, and we evaluated the efficacy of X-rays by comparing discrepancies between X-rays and MRI scans. Results: For a total of 363 patients, the mean age was 56.65 (20-93) and 214 (59%) were males. On the basis of X-rays, 67 cases (15.1%) were of the cervical spine, 133 cases (30.0%) were of the thoracic spine, and 243 cases (54.9%) were of the lumbar spine. In particular, the thoracolumbar region (T11-L2) was the most common, with 260 cases (58.7%). In X-rays, fractures were the least in the upper thoracic region (T1-T3), whereas MRI scans revealed fairly uniform distribution across the thoracic spine. Sensitivity of X-rays was lowest in the upper thoracic spine and specificity was almost always greater than 98%, except for 94.7% in L1. Positive predictive value was lower in the mid-thoracic region (T4-T9) and negative predictive value was slightly lower in C6, T2, and T3 than at other sites. Diagnostic accuracy of X-rays by vertebral body, transverse process, and spinous process according to fractured vertebral structures was significantly different according to vertebral level. Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy of X-rays was lower in the upper thoracic region than in other parts. Further studies are needed to identify better methods for diagnosis considering cost and neurological prognosis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bedbrook GM. Treatment of thoracolumbar dislocation and fractures with paraplegia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;(112):27-43.
  2. Burke D, Murray DD. The management of thoracic and thoraco-lumbar injuries of the spine with neurological involvement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1976;58:72-8.
  3. Riggins RS, Kraus JF. The risk of neurologic damage with fractures of the vertebrae. J Trauma 1977;17:126-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197702000-00007
  4. Kraus JF, Franti CE, Riggins RS. Neurologic outcome and vehicle and crash factors in motor vehicle related spinal cord injuries. Neuroepidemiology 1982;1:223-38. https://doi.org/10.1159/000110706
  5. Wagner FC Jr, Cheharzi B. Neurologic evaluation of cervical spinal cord injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:507. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198407000-00019
  6. Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD. Vertebral fracture and other predictors of physical impairment and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2469-75. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440200087011
  7. Ross PD. Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med 1997;103:S30-42; discussion 42S-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(97)90025-5
  8. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:221-7.
  9. Gehlbach S, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood JR. Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:577-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070078
  10. Delmas PD, van de Langerijt L, Watts NB, Eastell R, Genant H, Grauer A, et al. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:557-63.
  11. Tracy PT, Wright RM, Hanigan WC. Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:292-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198903000-00009
  12. Flanders AE, Schaefer DM, Doan HT, Mishkin MM, Gonzalez CF, Northrup BE. Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 1990;177:25-33. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399326
  13. Burger H, de Laet CE, van Daele PL, Weel AE, Witteman JC, Hofman A, et al. Risk factors for increased bone loss in an elderly population: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:871-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009541
  14. World Health Organization (WHO). Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis:report of a WHO study group [meeting held in Rome from 22 to 25 June 1992] [Internet]. Geneva: WHO 1994 [cited 2017 Aug 22]. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39142.
  15. Wainwright SA, Phipps KR, Stone JV, Cauley JA, Vogt MT, Black DM, et al. A large proportion of fractures in postmenopausal women occur with baseline bone mineral density T-score. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:S155.
  16. Black DM. Revision of T-score BMD diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:S58.
  17. Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Wehren LE, et al. Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1108-12. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.10.1108
  18. Leucht P, Fischer K, Muhr G, Mueller EJ. Epidemiology of traumatic spine fractures. Injury 2009;40:166-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.040
  19. Cho NS, Lee KU, Choi BN. Clinical analysis of traumatic spinal fractures. J Trauma Inj 1997;10:88-94.
  20. Ryan MD, Henderson JJ. The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Injury 1992;23:38-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(92)90123-A
  21. Walter J, Doris PE, Shaffer MA. Clinical presentation of patients with acute cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 1984;13:512-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(84)80515-6
  22. Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, Tigges S, Hoffman JR, Mower WR, et al. Distribution and patterns of blunt traumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2001.116150
  23. van Beek EJ, Been HD, Ponsen KK, Maas M. Upper thoracic spinal fractures in trauma patients - a diagnostic pitfall. Injury 2000;31:219-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00235-1
  24. Hugo D, Dunn RN. Proximal thoracic spine fractures: a dangerous blind spot. SA Orthop J 2011;10:30-5.
  25. Brandser EA, el-Khoury GY. Thoracic and lumbar spine trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:533-57.
  26. Bohlman HH. Treatment of fractures and dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:165-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198567010-00024
  27. Bradford DS, Akbarnia BA, Winter RB, Seljeskog EL. Surgical stabilization of fracture and fracture dislocations of the thoracic spine. Spine 1977;2:185-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-197709000-00004
  28. el-Khoury GY, Whitten CG. Trauma to the upper thoracic spine: anatomy, biomechanics, and unique imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:95-102. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.160.1.8416656
  29. Nightingale RW, Winkelstein BA, Knaub KE, Richardson WJ, Luck JF, Myers BS. Comparative strengths and structural properties of the upper and lower cervical spine in flexion and extension. J Biomech 2002;35:725-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00037-4
  30. Cusick JF, Yoganandan N. Biomechanics of the cervical spine 4: major injuries. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002;17:1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00101-2