The Study on the Influence of Hospital's Outsourcing Worker's QWL to the Turnover Intention

병원 아웃소싱 근로자의 QWL과 이직의도에 관한 분석 - 이중몰입의 조절효과를 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Hun Chul (Dept. of Administration Management, Seoul Seonam Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young Hoon (Dept. of Healthcare Management, Eulji University) ;
  • Kim, Han-sung (Dept. of Healthcare Informatics, Korea Polytechnic) ;
  • Woo, Jung Sic (Dept. of Health Administration, Cheju Halla University)
  • 김훈철 (서울특별시 서남병원 원무팀) ;
  • 김영훈 (을지대학교 의료경영학과) ;
  • 김한성 (폴리텍대학 강서캠퍼스 의료정보과) ;
  • 우정식 (제주한라대학교 보건행정학과)
  • Received : 2017.09.12
  • Accepted : 2017.12.06
  • Published : 2017.12.29

Abstract

[purpose] This study was conducted to identify how a hospital's outsourcing workers' QWL influences Turnover Intention and to determine Dual Commitment cause any discrepancies in regards to the link between QWL and Turnover Intention. [Methodology/Approach] The study is based on 254 survey sheets answered by outsourcing employees working at general hospitals with more than 300 beds in Seoul and the methods of analysis used are as follows: reliability analysis, correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis, and hierarchical regressions analysis. [Findings] The study results First, analyzing how different types of QWL (individual, organizational, managemental) influence Turnover Intention, R2 turned out to be 30.7% and organizational factors and managemental factors show a statistically significant difference. In addition, organizational and managemental factors have negative effects on Turnover Intention while that of organization factors has a bigger influence. Second, verifying regulation effects of Dual Commitment in regards to the link between QWL and Turnover Intention, it is learned that Dual Commitment (hiring firm) has no regulation effects on the link. However, it does have a regulation effect on the link between QWL (managemental) and Turnover Intention. Moreover, after verifying regulation effects of Dual Commitment (client's firm), it is learned that it has regulation effect on the link between QWL (organizational and managemental) and Trunover Intention. [Practical Implications] In conclusion, lower Turnover Intention, it is necessary to impose tasks that suit the employees' competence and to encourage efficiency throughout clear communications and accurate directions.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim YH. Hospital Human Resource Management. Soomoonsa. 2013.
  2. Lee SG. The Impact of External Workers On the Employment Performance. Korea journal of labor studies. 2011; 4(2): 1.
  3. Suh JR. A Stufy on the Dual Commitment of Outsourced Employees. Chung Ang University. 2011.
  4. Lee GH. Outsourcing. Korea Management Association. 1998.
  5. Choi DH. Determinants of HRD Outsourcing of Korea firms. Chung Ang University. 2008.
  6. Sheppad H I. One Indicators of the Quality of Work in Life: A Simplified Approach, In Davis and Cherns. 1975.
  7. Walton R. E. Quality ofr Working Life: What is it. Sloan Management Review. 1973; Fall, Wol 15 No.1.
  8. Albrecht Karl. Organization Development, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.; Prentice, Inc. 1983.
  9. Szilagyi, A. D Wallace, M. J. Organization Behavior and Performance 4th ed, Glenview, Illinois Scott, Foreman & Co. 1987; 683.
  10. Morrow P C. Concept of redundancy in organizational research : The case of work commitment, Academy of Management Review. 1983; Vol 8 No. 3: 486-500. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284606
  11. Morgan R. M. & S. D. Hunt. The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing. 1994; 58(3): 20-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308
  12. Becker T E. Foci and bases of Commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?. Academy of Management Studies.1992; 33: 59-73.
  13. Rees G. & Fielder S. The service economy, subcontracting and the new employment relations: Contract catering and cleaning. Work, Employment and Society. 1992; 6(3): 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/095001709263003
  14. Lacity M. & Willcocks L. Interpreting information technology sourcing decisions from a transaction cost perspective: Findings and critique. Accounting Management and Information Technologies. 1996; 53(4): 203-244.
  15. Hyman R. Flexible specialization: Miracle or myth?. In Hyman, R. and Streeck, W. (Eds.). New technology and industrial relations. Oxford:Basil Blackwell. 1998; 48-60.
  16. Mobley. Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequencies and Control Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley. 1982.
  17. Iverson C .Employee Intent to Stay: An Empirical Test of a Revision for the Price and Mueller Model. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation University of Iowa. 1992.
  18. Lee GH. A Study on the Relationship Effects-In case of Turnover intention.. Sunghyunkwan University. 1995.
  19. Lee SY. A Study on the Relationship between job Satisfaction and Intent to leave among Social Workers in old Peopleʼs Welfare facilities. Dankook University. 2002.
  20. Kim TH, Chang KR, Toon SJ. Organization and Job Related Satisfaction and Commitment on Turnover Intentions among Employees in Sport Organizations. Korean Journal of Sport Science. 2006; Vol.17 No2: 84-99.
  21. Gong GS, The study on job Environment and job Satisfaction Affecting Turnover Intention of Front-Line Welfare Workers in Community Child Centers. The Korean Family Welfare Association. 2010; Vol.15 No4: 23-48.
  22. Cho HS, The Effects of Organizational Culture on QWL and Organizational Effectiveness at general Hospital. Seoul Natioal University. 1999.
  23. Lee SH, Jo HS, Relationship between Quality of Working Life and Organizational Effectiveness of Employees at the General Hospital. Korean Society of Hospital Management. 1999.
  24. Park JH, A Study on the determinants of outsourcing performance in general hospital. Kosin University. 2011