Journal of Information Processing Systems

  • 제13권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1496-1515
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1976-913X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-805X(eISSN)
한국정보처리학회 (Korea Information Processing Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Combining Multi-Criteria Analysis with CBR for Medical Decision Support

  • 투고 : 2015.07.07
  • 심사 : 2017.03.04
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

One of the most visible developments in Decision Support Systems (DSS) was the emergence of rule-based expert systems. Hence, despite their success in many sectors, developers of Medical Rule-Based Systems have met several critical problems. Firstly, the rules are related to a clearly stated subject. Secondly, a rule-based system can only learn by updating of its rule-base, since it requires explicit knowledge of the used domain. Solutions to these problems have been sought through improved techniques and tools, improved development paradigms, knowledge modeling languages and ontology, as well as advanced reasoning techniques such as case-based reasoning (CBR) which is well suited to provide decision support in the healthcare setting. However, using CBR reveals some drawbacks, mainly in its interrelated tasks: the retrieval and the adaptation. For the retrieval task, a major drawback raises when several similar cases are found and consequently several solutions. Hence, a choice for the best solution must be done. To overcome these limitations, numerous useful works related to the retrieval task were conducted with simple and convenient procedures or by combining CBR with other techniques. Through this paper, we provide a combining approach using the multi-criteria analysis (MCA) to help, the traditional retrieval task of CBR, in choosing the best solution. Afterwards, we integrate this approach in a decision model to support medical decision. We present, also, some preliminary results and suggestions to extend our approach.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. I. Bichindaritz and C. Marling, "Case-based reasoning in the health sciences: foundations and research directions," in Computational Intelligence in Healthcare 4: Advanced Methodologies. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010, pp. 127-157.
  2. S. Montani, "Exploring new roles for case-based reasoning in heterogeneous AI systems for medical decision support," Applied Intelligence, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 275-285, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-007-0046-2
  3. D. A. John and R. R. John, "A framework for medical diagnosis using hybrid reasoning," in Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, 2010.
  4. I. Bichindaritz and S. Montani, "Introduction to the special issue on case-based reasoning in the health sciences," Computational Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 161-164, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2009.00342.x
  5. N. Armaghan and J. Renaud, "An application of multi-criteria decision aids models for case-based reasoning," Information Sciences, vol. 210, pp. 55-66, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.04.033
  6. M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, "An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods," International Journal of Operations Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 56-66, 2013.
  7. B. Roy and D. Bouyssou, Aide multicritere a la decision: methodes et cas. Paris, France: Economica, 1993.
  8. A. Aamodt and E. Plaza, "Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches," AI Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39-59, 1994.
  9. C. Marling, J. Shubrook, and F. Schwartz, "Toward case-based reasoning for diabetes management: a preliminary clinical study and decision support system prototype," Computational Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 165-179, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2009.00336.x
  10. M. K. Jha, D. Pakhira, and B. Chakraborty, "Diabetes detection and care applying CBR techniques," International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 132-137, 2013.
  11. X. Song, S. Petrovic, and S. Sundar, "A case-based reasoning approach to dose planning in radiotherapy," in Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Belfast, UK, 2007, pp. 348-357.
  12. F. J. De Paz, S. Rodriguez, J. Bajo, and J. M. Corchado, "Case-based reasoning as a decision support system for cancer diagnosis: a case study," International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 97-110, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3233/HIS-2009-0089
  13. F. L. Schwartz, J. H. Shubrook, and C. R. Marling, "Use of case-based reasoning to enhance intensive management of patients on insulin pump therapy," Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 603-611, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680800200411
  14. N. Belacel, "Multicriteria decision analysis methodology for medical diagnosis aid," 2003 [Online]. Available: http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?action=rtdoc&an=8914299&lang=en.
  15. M. Shanbezadeh, T. Soltani, and M. Ahmadi, "Developing a clinical decision support model to evaluate the quality of asthma control level," Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 387-393, 2013.
  16. G. Van Valkenhoef, T. Tervonen, J. Zhao, B. de Brock, H. L. Hillege, and D. Postmus, "Multicriteria benefit: risk assessment using network meta-analysis," Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 65. no. 4, pp. 394-403, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.005
  17. A. Erjaee, M. Bagherpour, S. Razeghi, S. M. Dehghani, M. H. Imanieh, and M. Haghighat, "A multicriteria decision making model for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in children," Hong Kong Journal of Paediatrics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 237-242, 2012.
  18. A. Bouhana, M. Abed, and H. Chabchoub, "An integrated case-based reasoning and AHP method for personalized itinerary search," in Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Logistics, Hammamet, Tunisia, 2011, pp. 460-467.
  19. K. A. Kumar, Y. Singh, and S. Sanyal, "Hybrid approach using case-based reasoning and rule-based reasoning for domain independent clinical decision support in ICU," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 65-71, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.054
  20. S. Begum, M. U. Ahmed, P. Funk, N. Xiong, and M. Folke, "Case-based reasoning systems in the health sciences: a survey of recent trends and developments," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 421-434, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2071862
  21. C. Marling, E. Rissland, and A. Aamodt, "Integrations with case-based reasoning," The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 241-245, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988890600066X
  22. H. Li and J. Sun, "Hybridizing principles of the Electre method with case-based reasoning for data mining: Electre-CBR-I and Electre-CBR-II," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 214-224, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.024
  23. G. F. Royes, "A hybrid fuzzy-multicriteria-CBR methodology for strategic planning support," in Proceedings of IEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing (NAFIPS '04), Banff, Canada, 2004, pp. 208-213.
  24. A. K. Araujo de Castro, P. R. Pinheiro, and M. C. D. Pinheiro, "Towards the neuropsychological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a hybrid model in decision making," in Proceedings of 2nd World Summit on the Knowledge Society (WSKS 2009), Chania, Greece, 2009, pp. 522-531.
  25. R. Schmidt, S. Montani, R. Bellazzi, L. Portinale, and L. Gierl, "Cased-based reasoning for medical knowledge-based systems," International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 64, no. 2-3, pp. 355-367, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00221-0
  26. S. Begum, M. U. Ahmed, P. Funk, N. Xiong, and B. V. Scheele, "A case-based decision support system for individual stress diagnosis using fuzzy similarity matching," Computational Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 180-195, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2009.00337.x
  27. L. Verma, S. Srinivasan, and V. Sapra, "Integration of rule based and case based reasoning system to support decision making," in Proceedings of International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (ICICT), Ghaziabad, India, 2014, pp. 106-108.
  28. J. Agarwal and S. S. Bedi, "Implementation of hybrid image fusion technique for feature enhancement in medical diagnosis," Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, vol. 5, article no. 3, 2015.
  29. K. M. Prabusankarlal, P. Thirumoorthy, and R. Manavalan, "Assessment of combined textural and morphological features for diagnosis of breast masses in ultrasound," Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, vol. 5, article no. 12, 2015.
  30. V. Vijayarajan, M. Dinakaran, P. Tejaswin, Priyam, and M. Lohani, "A generic framework for ontologybased information retrieval and image retrieval in web data," Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, vol. 6, article no. 18, 2016.
  31. F. M. Moghadam and M. R. Keyvanpour, "Comparative study of various Persian stemmers in the field of information retrieval," Journal of Information Processing Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 450-464, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.04.0020
  32. R. Kumar, P. Chandra, and M. Hanmandlu, "A robust fingerprint matching system using orientation features," Journal of Information Processing Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 83-89, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.02.0020
  33. M. Szelag, S. Greco, and R. Slowinski, "Similarity-based classification with dominance-based decision rules," in Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Rough Sets, Santiago, Chile, 2016, pp. 355-364.
  34. H. Malekpoor, N. Mishra, S. Sumalya, and S. Kumari, "An efficient approach to radiotherapy dose planning problem: a TOPSIS case-based reasoning approach," International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 4-12, 2016.
  35. A. Bouhana, A. Zidi, A. Fekih, H. Chabchoub, and M. Abed, "An ontology-based CBR approach for personalized itinerary search systems for sustainable urban freight transport," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 3724-3741, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.012
  36. J. Qi, J. Hu, and Y. Peng, "Hybrid weighted mean for CBR adaptation in mechanical design by exploring effective, correlative and adaptative values," Computers in Industry, vol. 75, pp. 58-66, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.007
  37. B. Noori, "Developing a CBR system for marketing mix planning and weighting method selection using fuzzy AHP," Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-32, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2014.962282
  38. H. Wang, B. Sun, and X. Shen, "Hybrid similarity measure for retrieval in case-based reasoning systems and its applications for computer numerical control turret design," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405 416654432.
  39. J. Uddin, R. Islam, and J. M. Kim, "Texture feature extraction techniques for fault diagnosis of induction motors," Journal of Convergence, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 15-20, 2014.
  40. T. Pelaccia, J. Tardif, E. Triby, C. Ammirati, C. Betrand, and B. Charlin, "Comment les medecins raisonnent-ils pour poser des diagnostics et prendre des decisions therapeutiques? Les enjeux en medecine d'urgence," Annales Francaises de Medecine D'urgence, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77-84, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13341-010-0006-1
  41. J. P. Kassirer, "Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached," Academic Medicine, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1118-1124, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d5dd0d
  42. World Health Organization: Sexual and Reproductive Health [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/topics/family_planning/en/.
  43. World Health Organization: Family Planning/Contraception [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs351/en/.
  44. B. Roy, "The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods." Theory and Decision, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49-73, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132
  45. S. B. Mena, "Introduction aux methodes multicriteres d'aide a la decision," Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Societe et Environnement, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 83-93, 2000.
  46. J. A. Recio-Garcia, B. Diaz-Agudo, and P. Gonzalez Calero, jCOLIBRI2 Tutorial. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2008.
  47. J. A. Fortney, "The importance of family planning in reducing maternal mortality," Studies in Family Planning, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 109-114, 1987. https://doi.org/10.2307/1966702
  48. L. R. Beach, B. D. Townes, F. L. Campbell, and G. W. Keating, "Developing and testing a decision aid for birth planning decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 99-116, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90031-3
  49. E. B. Schwarz, S. M. Parisi, S. M. Handler, G. Koren, E. D. Cohen, G. J. Shevchik, and G. S. Fischer, "Clinical decision support to promote safe prescribing to women of reproductive age: a clusterrandomized trial," Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 831-838, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-1991-y
  50. V. Setty-Venugopal and U. D. Upadhyay, Birth Spacing: Three to Five Saves Lives. Baltimore, MD: Population Reports, 2002.
  51. M. L. Kavanaugh and R. M. Anderson, Contraception and Beyond: The Health Benefits of Services Provided at Family Planning Centers. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute, 2013.
  52. UCI Machine Learning Repository, "Contraceptive Method Choice Data Set," 1999 [Online]. Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Contraceptive+Method+Choice.