DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Calibration of Parameters for Predicting Hysteretic Behavior of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams

반복하중을 받는 대각보강 콘크리트 연결보의 이력거동 예측을 위한 매개변수 결정방법

  • Received : 2017.07.25
  • Accepted : 2017.10.11
  • Published : 2017.11.01

Abstract

The coupled shear wall system with coupling beams is an efficient structural system for high-rise buildings because it can provide excellent ductility and energy dissipation to the buildings. The objective of this study is to simulate the hysteretic behavior of diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams including pinching and cyclic deteriorations in strength and stiffness using a numerical model. For this purpose, coupling beams are modeled with an elastic beam element and plastic spring element placed at the beam ends. Parameters for the analytical model was calibrated based on the test results of 6 specimens for diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams. The analytical model with calibrated model parameters is verified by comparing the hysteretic curves obtained from analysis and experimental tests.

Keywords

References

  1. Naish D, Fry A, Klemencic R, Wallace JW. Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams Part1 : Testing. ACI Structural Journal. 2013;110(6): 1057-1066.
  2. Vu NS, Li, B, Beyer K. Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams. Engineering Structures. 2014;76:371-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.014
  3. Paulay T. Coupling Beams of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls. Journal of the Structural Division. 1971;97(3):843-862.
  4. Paulay T, Binney JR. Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams of Shear Walls. ACI Special Publication. 1974;42:579-598.
  5. Tassios TP, Moretti M, Bezas A. On the Behavior and Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams of Shear Walls. ACI Structural Journal. 1996;93(6):711-720.
  6. Galano L, Vignoli A. Seismic Behavior of Short Coupling Beams with Different Reinforcement Layouts. ACI Structural Journal. 2000;97(6):876-885.
  7. Fortney PJ, Rassati GA, Shahrooz BM. Investigation on Effect of Transverse Reinforcement on Performance of Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams. ACI Structural Journal. 2008;105(6):781-788.
  8. Wallace JW. Modeling Issues for Tall Reinforced Core Wall Buildings. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2007; 16(5):615-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.440
  9. Orakcal K, Sanchez LMM, Wallace JW. Analytical Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Walls for Predicting Flexural and Coupled- Shear-Flexural Responses. Report. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Berkeley. CA. 2006/07.
  10. Barbachyn SM, Kurama YC, Novak LC. Analytical Evaluation of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams under Lateral Loads. ACI Structural Journal. 2012;109(4):497-507.
  11. Hindi RA, Hassan MA. Shear Capacity of Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams. Engineering Structures. 2004;26(10):1437-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.012
  12. Lim E, Hwang SJ, Cheng CH, Lin PY. Cyclic Tests of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beam with Intermediate Span-Depth Ratio. ACI Structural Journal. 2016;113(3):515-524.
  13. Lignos DG, Krawinkler H. Deterioration Modeling of Steel Components in Support of Collapse Prediction of Steel Moment Frames under Earthquake Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2011;137(11):1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376
  14. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. OpenSees. software. 2010. Available from: http://opensees.berkeley.edu
  15. Lowes LN, Altoontash A. Modeling Reinforced-Concrete Beam- Column Joints Subjected to Cyclic Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2003;129(12):1686-1697. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1686)
  16. ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute. Farmington Hills, MI. c2014.
  17. Han SW, Lee CS, Shin M, Lee K. Cyclic Performance of Precast Coupling Beams with Bundled Diagonal Reinforcement. Engineering Structures, 2015;93:142-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.034
  18. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The Effects of Strength and Stiffness Degradation on Seismic Response. Report. Washington, DC. c2009.
  19. Lignos DG, Krawinkler H. Deterioration Modeling of Steel Components in Support of Collapse Prediction of Steel Moment Frames under Earthquake Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2011;137(11):1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376

Cited by

  1. Efficient Simulation of Hysteretic Behavior of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams vol.22, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2018.22.2.095