DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The influence of task demands on the preparation of spoken word production: Evidence from Korean

  • Received : 2017.10.28
  • Accepted : 2017.12.06
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

It was shown in speech production studies that the preparation unit of spoken word production is language particular, such as onset phonemes for English and Dutch, syllables for Mandarin Chinese, and morae for Japanese. However, there have been inconsistent results on whether the onset phoneme is a planning unit of spoken word production in Korean. In this study, two sets of experiments investigated possible influences of task demands on the phonological preparation in native Korean adults, namely, implicit priming and word naming with the form preparation paradigm. Only the word naming task, but not the implicit priming task, showed a significant onset priming effect, even though there were significant syllable priming effects in both tasks. Following the attentional theory ($O^{\prime}S{\acute{e}}aghdha$ & Frazer, 2014), these results suggest that task demands might play a role in the absence/presence of onset priming effects in Korean. Native Korean speakers could maintain their attention to the shared onset phonemes in word naming, which is not very demanding, while they have difficulties in allocating their attention to such units in a more cognitive-demanding implicit priming, even though both tasks involve accessing phonological codes. These findings demonstrate that there are cross-linguistic differences in the first selectable unit in preparation of spoken word production, but within a single language, the preparation unit might not be immutable.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen, J.-Y., & Li, C.-Y.(2011). Word form encoding in Chinese word naming and word typing. Cognition, 121, 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.009
  2. Chen, J.-Y., Chen, T.-M., & Dell, G. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 751-781. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2825
  3. Chen, T.-M., & Chen, J.-Y. (2006). Morphological encoding in the production of compound words in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.002
  4. Chen, T.-M., & Chen, J.-Y. (2013). The syllable as the proximate unit in Mandarin Chinese word production: An intrinsic or accidental property of the production system? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(1), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0326-7
  5. Han, J.-I., & Choi, T.-H. (2016). The proximate unit in the production of Korean words. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 22(2), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2016.22.2.383
  6. Han, J.-I., & Verdonschot, R. (2017). The functional phonological unit of spoken word production in Korean. M.S. Konkuk University & Hiroshima University.
  7. Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2002). Using Korean to investigate phonological priming effects without the influence of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 569-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960143000281
  8. Kureta, Y., Fushimi, T., & Tatsumi, I. (2006). The functional unit in phonological encoding: Evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1102-1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1102
  9. Lee, C., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002
  10. Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
  11. Li, C., & Wang, M. (2017). The influence of orthographic experience on the development of phonological preparation in spoken word production. Memory and Cognition, 45(6), 956-973. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0712-5
  12. McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 817-835. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.817
  13. Meyer, A. (1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69-89.
  14. Meyer, A. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 524-545.
  15. Mok, P., & Lee, S. (2008). Korean speech rhythm using rhythmic measures. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Linguists (CIL 18). Seoul, Korea.
  16. O'Seaghdha, P., & Frazer, A. (2014). The exception does not rule: Attention constrains form preparation in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 797-810. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035576
  17. O'Seaghdha, P., Chen, J.-Y., & Chen, T.-M. (2010). Proximate units in word production: phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115, 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001
  18. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
  19. Roelofs, A. (2006). The influence of spelling on phonological encoding in word reading, object naming, and word generation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(1), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193809
  20. Schiller, N. (1998). The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 484-507. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2577
  21. Simpson, G., & Kang, H. (2004). Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013808.65933.a1
  22. Sohn, H.-S. (1987). Underspecification in Korean phonology. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  23. Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean, and Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  24. Verdonschot, R., Kiyama, S., Tamaoka, K., Kinoshita, S., La Heij, W., & Schiller, N. (2011). The functional unit of Japanese word naming: evidence from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1458-1473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024491
  25. Witzel, N., Witzel, J., & Choi, Y. (2013). The locus of the masked onset priming effect: Evidence from Korean. The Mental Lexicon, 8(3), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.3.04wit
  26. Won, K.-H. (1987). Igosi Hangul ida [This is Hangul]. Seoul: Samchungdang.