Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study for the Direction and Tasks for Innovating School System in the Intelligent Information Society

지능정보사회에서 학교교육체제 혁신 방향과 과제 탐색을 위한 시론적 연구

  • Received : 2017.10.01
  • Accepted : 2017.12.20
  • Published : 2017.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore some directions and alternatives for reforming the school education system, which is one of the core policy agendas of the Korean society that has met the upcoming 4th industrial revolution era and intelligence information society. Korean school education is a supplier-oriented system that does not take into consideration student's individual needs and aptitudes, and maintains uniform educational and learning practices while strengthening the characteristics of factory school model of the early 20th century. Especially, according to the excessive follow-up of the college entrance examination of the people the de-contextualization of knowledge and the instrumentation and learning of the education has been deepened. For the reform of the education system, first, it should transform the curriculum delegation system from the current administrative to teacher-based system. Second, we need to dismantle the bureaucratic corps of teacher that erodes the autonomy of the teacher and should establish the professional teacher system. Third, we should overcome egoism of each curriculum territory and reform the teacher education system. Fourth, it is necessary to overhaul the system of education and administrative bureaucracy as well as to overhaul the system of educational law. Fifth, it is necessary for the school administration to provide more effective communication between learners and teachers.

이 연구는 다가온 4차 산업혁명시대와 지능정보사회를 맞은 한국 사회의 핵심적 정책 아젠다 중 하나인 학교교육 체제 개혁을 위한 몇 가지 방향과 대안들을 탐색하는 데 목적이 있다. 한국 학교교육은 학생의 소질과 적성을 고려하지 않은 공급자 중심 체제이고, 20세기 초반의 공장제식 학교교육의 특징을 굳건히 하면서 획일적 교육 및 학습 관행을 지속하고 있다. 특히, 교육계 종사자들의 대학입시에 대한 과도한 추종에 따라 교육현장에서 지식의 도구화와 학습의 탈맥락화가 심화되고 있으며, 따라서 4차 산업혁명기가 요구하는 공감하고 협력하면서도 주체적으로 생각하고 판단할 줄 아는 인간을 양성해내는 데 한계가 발생하고 있다. 따라서 이를 개혁하기 위한 교육 혁신의 과제로서 다음 몇 가지 사항을 검토하고 제언하였다. 첫째, 교육과정 수권체계를 선진형 교사수권체계로 변화시키고, 둘째, 교사의 자율성을 잠식하는 관료적 교사단체제를 해체하고 전문적 교사단 체제를 정립하며, 셋째, 교육과정 편성 및 운영과정에서 교과영역 이기주의를 극복하고 교원양성교육과정의 철저한 개선이 시급하고, 넷째, 과도한 교육행정관료제의 완화와 함께 교육법 체계의 전면적인 개편이 필요하며, 다섯째, 학교교육 지원행정을 학습자와 교수자 상호간의 활발한 커뮤니케이션이 이루어지도록 적극 유도할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. T .J. Kang et al., "Strategy for the development of Education in Intelligent Information Society," Korea Educational Development, 2016.
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning(MSIP), "Press Release about Comprehensive Plan for Intelligent Information Society," MSIP, 2016.
  3. World Economic Forum, "The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution," 2016.
  4. J-S. Hwang, "Paradigms of the Intelligent Society : Analysis and Policy Implications", Informatization Policy, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 3-18, 2016. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2016.23.2.003
  5. C. B. Frey & M. Osborne, "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?" http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf. 2013.
  6. R. Rosen, "Project Classroom: Transforming Our Schools for the Future" The Atlantic, 2011.
  7. H. Sirkin, M. Zinser, & J. Rose, "The robotics revolution: The next great real in manufacturing" Boston Consulting Group, 2015.
  8. K. H. Kim, "4th Industrial Revolution and Trend in Technology," Paper Presented in the Future Education Forum, Organized by Korea Education and Research Information Science(KERIS), KERIS, 2016.
  9. Y. U. Harari, "Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow," Translated by M. J. Kim, Gimm-Young Publishers, Inc, 2017.
  10. Pressian, "The Author of Sapiens told 80-90% of school education useless", http://www.pressian.com/news/article.html?no=135917, 2016.4.26.
  11. K. S. Noh, K. G, Kim, & J. B, Byun, "A Study on the Competence Model of Smart Worker," Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 215-224. 2011.
  12. J. Y. Chung, "A Study for Redesigning School Education System for Intelligent Information Society," Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 34. No. 4, pp. 49-71, 2016.
  13. D. H. Kim, K. H. Han, D.H. Jang, "Milestone for 2030 Future Society Talent and Core Scientific Competencies," Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity, 2016.
  14. eSchool News, "Five things students say they want from education," http://www.eschoolnews.com/2011/07/28/five-things-students-say-they-want-from-education/3/ 2011.7.28.
  15. Education Reform Panel, "Plan and Execution for Advancement of Education Reform in Korea," Hansun Foundation, 2007.
  16. K. Robinson, "Creative schools," Translated by M. N. Chung, 21st Century Books, 2015.
  17. I-H. Lee, "An Analysis of School Change of A Middle School according to the Free Semester Policy," Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 33-42, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.1.33
  18. Joongang SUNDAY, 4th Industrial Revolution Era, Without Change of Education, There is No Future," http://news.joins.com/article/21278404 2017.2.19.
  19. Ministry of Education(MOE), "2017 Practical Qualification Handbook," MOE, 2017.
  20. P. Sahlberg, "Finnish lessons," Translated by E.J. Lee, Purunsup, 2015.
  21. Y-H. Hong, Y-W. Im, "An analysis of factors which affect teachers' self-confidence in using technology for mathematics class," Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. 565-577, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.11.565
  22. K. S. Lee, M. S. Kim. D. K, Kim, "Characteristics of Finnish Teacher Education Program and Its Implication, The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 217-236, 2012.
  23. D. Tyack, & L, Cuban, "Tinkering toward Utopia" Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.