Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association (유기물자원화)

Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association (유기성자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Crop Yield and Soil Physical Properties to Application of Organic Resources in Upland

밭 토양에서 유기물 자원의 시용이 작물 수량 및 토양 물리성에 미치는 영향

  • Han, Kyunghwa (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jung, Kangho (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Cho, Heerae (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Hyubsung (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ok, Junghun (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Zhang, Yongseon (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Gisun (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Seo, Youngho (Gangwon Agricultural Research & Extension Services)
  • 한경화 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 정강호 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 조희래 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 이협성 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 옥정훈 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 장용선 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김기선 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 서영호 (강원도농업기술원)
  • Received : 2017.10.11
  • Accepted : 2017.11.22
  • Published : 2017.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Application of organic resources to agricultural land can increase crop yield by improving soil characteristics. The objective of this study was to evaluate effect of crop yield and soil physical properties including aggregate stability to application of organic resources in upland. The soybean was cultivated in a sandy loam field and a clay loam field located at Suwon and a sandy loam field located at Pyeongchang. The organic resources used in this study were rice straw compost (RSC), composted pig manure with sawdust (CPIG), composted poultry manure with sawdust (CPM), and cocopeat applied before sowing crop. Application rate of organic resources was determined based on carbon content and water content. The inorganic fertilizers were applied based on soil testing. In addition, the decomposition of RSC, CPIG, and cocopeat was characterized by isothermal incubation with sandy loam soil. The decomposition rate was highest for RSC followed by CPIG and cocopeat. Organic resource application increased yield of soybean, which effect was greater in clay loam than in sandy loam. In addition, increase in gas phase proportion by organic resource application was distinct in clay loam soil compared with sandy loam soil. In terms of aggregate stability, increasing effect was more obvious in sandy loam soils than in a clay loam soil. The highest yield was observed in RSC treatment plots for all the fields. Improvement of soybean yield and soil physical characteristics by cocopeat was not as much as that of the other organic resources. The results implied that RSC could be recommended for promoting aggregate stability and crop yield in upland cultivation.

농경지에 유기물 자원을 시용하면 지력이 높아져서 작물의 수량이 높아진다. 본 연구의 목적은 유기물 자원을 밭 토양에 시용하였을 때 작물 수량 및 토양 물리성에 미치는 영향을 유기물 자원별로 비교하고자 하였다. 콩을 평야지인 수원의 사양토와 식양토 포장에서 재배하였으며, 온도 영향을 살펴보기 위하여 고랭지 평창의 사양토 포장에서도 수행하였다. 시험에 쓰인 유기물 자원은 볏짚퇴비, 돈분톱밥퇴비, 계분톱밥퇴비, 코코피트였으며, 콩 파종 전에 탄소 기준으로 동등한 수준으로 시용하였다. 무기질비료의 시용량은 토양검정한 분석치를 고려하여 결정하였다. 유기물 자원의 분해 특성을 살펴보기 위하여 항온배양실험을 실내에서 사양토를 대상으로 수행하였다. 분해 속도는 볏짚퇴비가 가장 높았으며, 돈분톱밥퇴비, 코코피트 순이었다. 유기물 자원의 시용에 따른 콩 수량의 증가 효과는 사양토에 비해서 식양토에서 높았다. 기상 비율의 증가 효과도 식양토에서 뚜렷하였다. 반면에 토양 입단 안정성의 증가 효과는 사양토에서 비교적 높았다. 볏짚퇴비가 모든 토양에서 콩 수량의 증가 효과가 가장 높았다. 코코피트의 콩 수량 증가 및 토양 물리성 개선 효과는 다른 유기물 자원에 비해서 높지 않았다. 따라서 밭작물 수량의 증대 및 토양 물리성의 개선을 위해서는 축분퇴비 등 다른 유기물 자원에 비해서 볏짚퇴비가 적합하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Park, C.S., "Effects of organic material application on the growth and yield of crops in Korea", Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert., 11(3), pp. 175-194. (1978).
  2. Hur, B.K., Kim, L.Y., Jo, I.S., Park, Y.S., Um, K.T., and Kim, M.S., "Effects of organic matter resources on the soil improvement and crop growth", Res. Rep. RDA Plant Environ. Mycol. Farm Prod. Util., 28(1), pp. 7-12. (1986).
  3. Jo, I.S., "Effect of organic fertilizer on soil physical properties and plant growth", Technical Bulletin No. 119 Food & Fertilizer Technology Center. pp. 1-16. (1990).
  4. Marinari, S., Masciandaro, G., Ceccanti, B., and Grego, S., "Influence of organic and mineral fertilisers on soil biological and physical properties", Bioresour. Technol., 72(1), pp. 9-17. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00094-2
  5. Aggelides, S.M. and Londra. P.A., "Effects of compost produced from town wastes and sewage sludge on the physical properties of a loamy and a clay soil", Bioresour. Technol., 71(3), pp. 253-259. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00074-7
  6. Brady, N.C. and Weil. R.R., The nature and properties of soils, 14th ed., Pearson-Prentice Hall, pp. 521-527. (2008).
  7. Park, K.C., Kim, Y.S., Kwon, O.H., Kwon, T.R., Park, S.G., "Effects of organic amendments on soil microbial community in red pepper field", Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert., 41(2), pp. 118-125. (2008).
  8. Lee, C.R., Ok, J.H., An, M.S., Lee, S.B., Park, K.L., Hong, S.G., Kim, M.G., and Park, C.B., "Soil chemical properties of long-term organic cultivation upland", Korean J. Org. Agric., 25(1), pp. 161-170. (2017). https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2017.25.1.161
  9. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS), Methods of soil physical analysis, NAAS, Rural Development Administration, pp. 34-76. (2017).
  10. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS), Methods of soil chemical analysis, NAAS, Rural Development Administration, pp. 51-60. (2010).
  11. Tagliavini, M., Tonon, G. Scandellari, F., Quinones, A., Palmieri, S., Menarbin, G., Gioacchini, P., and Masia, A., "Nutrient recycling during the decomposition of apple leaves (Malus domestica) and mowed grasses in an orchard", Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 118(1), pp. 191-200. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.018
  12. Yoon, S.T., Je, E.K., Kim, Y.J., Jeong, I.H., Han, T.K., Kim, T.Y., Cho, Y.S., and Yun, E.S., "Survey and evaluation of paddy-upland rotation production system", J. Korean Soc. Int. Agric., 26(4), pp. 531-543. (2014). https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.4.531
  13. Bronick, C.J. and Lal, R., "Soil structure and management: a review", Geoderma, 124(1), pp. 3-22. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005
  14. Paul, E.A. and Clark, F.E., Soil microbiology and biochemistry, Academic press, Inc. pp. 127-130. (1989).
  15. Carter M.R., "Soil quality sustainable land management: organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions", Agron. J., 94(1), pp. 38-47. (2002). https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0038
  16. Dalal, R.C. and Bridge, B.J., Aggregation and organic matter storage in sub-humid and semi-arid soils, In: Carter, M.R. and Stewart, B.A., Structure and Organic Matter Storage in Agricultural Soils. CRC Press, pp. 263-307. (1996).
  17. Kay, B.D., "Rates of change of soil structure different cropping system", Adv. Soil Sci., 12, pp. 1-52. (1989).
  18. McLaren, R.G. and Cameron, K.C., Soil Science, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, pp 152-168. (1996).
  19. Oades, J.M., Soil organic matter and structural stability: mechanisms and implications for management, In: Tinsley, J. and Darbyshire, J.F., Biological Processes and Soil Fertility. Springer Netherlands, pp. 319-337. (1984).
  20. Six, J., Elliott, E.T., and Paustian, K., "Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture", Soil Biol. Biochem., 32(14), pp. 2099-2103. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00179-6
  21. Tisdall, J.M. and Oades, J.M., "Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils", Eur. J. Soil Sci., 33(2), pp. 141-163. (1982). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x