DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reduction of Closed Frontal Sinus Fractures through Suprabrow Approach

  • Hahn, Hyung Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Yoo Jung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Myong Chul (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Il Jae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sue Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Dong Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.09.08
  • Accepted : 2017.10.18
  • Published : 2017.12.20

Abstract

Background: The traditional approach for reduction of frontal sinus fractures is coronal incision. Inherent complications of the coronal approach include long scar, hair loss, and long operation time. We describe a simple approach for the reduction of frontal sinus anterior wall fractures using a suprabrow incision that is commonly used for brow lift. Methods: From March 2007 to October 2016, the authors identified patients with anterior wall frontal sinus fractures treated by open reduction through a suprabrow incision. Only cases with photographic/radiographic documentation and a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. The incision line was designed to be at the upper margin of the eyebrow. Medical records and radiographic data were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, cosmetic results, and complication were assessed. The patient scale of the patient and observer scar assessment scale was used to assess patient satisfaction for incisional scar at the 6-month follow-up. Results: Thirty-one patients underwent fracture reduction through a suprabrow approach during the study period, with a mean follow-up of 41 months. No patients showed any recurrent displacement, eyebrow asymmetry, or infection during follow-up. Thirteen patients reported their forehead paresthesia postoperatively, and 12 of them had preoperative symptom. One patient complained of incisional scar and underwent scar revision. All patients were satisfied with their eyebrow and forehead contour. Conclusion: The suprabrow approach allowed for an accurate reduction of the fractures in the anterior wall frontal sinus by providing direct visualization of the fracture. This transcutaneous approach can effectively restore forehead contour with acceptable postoperative complications and patient satisfaction.

Keywords

References

  1. Lim JS, Oh YH, Cho SP, Han KT, Lim P. A clinical review of frontal sinus fracture. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;18:274-80.
  2. Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH. Management of frontal sinus fractures: changing concepts. Clin Plast Surg 1992;19:219-32.
  3. Tiwari P, Higuera S, Thornton J, Hollier LH. The management of frontal sinus fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1354-60.
  4. Graham HD 3rd, Spring P. Endoscopic repair of frontal sinus fracture: case report. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 1996;2:52-5.
  5. Lappert PW, Lee JW. Treatment of an isolated outer table frontal sinus fracture using endoscopic reduction and fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1642-5.
  6. Strong EB, Kellman RM. Endoscopic repair of anterior table: frontal sinus fractures. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2006;14:25-9.
  7. Strong EB. Endoscopic repair of anterior table frontal sinus fractures. Facial Plast Surg 2009;25:43-8.
  8. Hwang K, Song YB. Closed reduction of fractured anterior wall of the frontal bone. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:120-2.
  9. Kim KS, Kim ES, Hwang JH, Lee SY. Transcutaneous transfrontal approach through a small peri-eyebrow incision for the reduction of closed anterior table frontal sinus fractures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:763-8.
  10. Yoo A, Eun SC, Baek RM. Transcutaneous reduction of frontal sinus fracture using bony tapper device. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:1835-7.
  11. Noury M, Dunn RM, Lalikos JF, Fudem GM, Rothkopf DM. Frontal sinus repair through a frontalis rhytid approach. Ann Plast Surg 2011;66:457-9.
  12. Kim J, Choi H. A review of subbrow approach in the management of non-complicated anterior table frontal sinus fracture. Arch Craniofac Surg 2016;17:186-9.
  13. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1960-5.
  14. Gunter JP, Antrobus SD. Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1808-16.
  15. Godhi SS, Kukreja P, Singh V, Goyal S. Versatility of the coronal approach in maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Health Community Dent 2010;4:16-21.
  16. Janis JE, Ghavami A, Lemmon JA, Leedy JE, Guyuron B. The anatomy of the corrugator supercilii muscle: part II. Supraorbital nerve branching patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:233-40.
  17. Kleintjes WG. Forehead anatomy: arterial variations and venous link of the midline forehead f lap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:593-606.
  18. Rubira-Bullen IR, Rubira CM, Sarmento VA, Azevedo RA. Frontal sinus size on facial plain radiographs. J Morphol Sci 2010;27:77-81.

Cited by

  1. Aesthetic treatment of frontal sinus fractures and their complications vol.61, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2018.61.12.732
  2. Removal of intraosseous hemangioma in frontal bone under direct vision through a small incision vol.22, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00661