DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

모래여과 공정과 막여과 공정의 운영효율 비교

Comparison of operational efficiency between sand-filtration process and membrane filtration process

  • Byeon, Kwangjin (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jang, Eunsu (KUMHO Engineering&Construction)
  • 투고 : 2017.09.04
  • 심사 : 2017.11.23
  • 발행 : 2017.12.15

초록

Membrane filtration process is an advanced water treatment technology that has excellently removes turbidity and microorganisms. However, it is known that it has problems such as low economic efficiency and the operating stability. Therefore, this study was to evaluate on the economical feasibility and operational stability comparison of membrane and sand filtration process in Im-sil drinking water treatment plant. For the economic analysis of each process, the electricity cost and chemical consumption were compared. In the case of electric power consumption, electricity cost is $68.67KRW/m^3$ for sand filtration and $79.98KRW/m^3$ for membrane filtration, respectively. Therefore, membrane filtration process was about 16% higher than sand filtration process of electricity cost. While, the coagulant usage in the membrane filtration process was 43% lower than the sand filtration process. Thus, comparing the operation costs of the two processes, there is no significant difference in the operating cost of the membrane filtration process and the sand filtration process as $85.94KRW/m^3$ and $79.71KRW/m^3$ respectively (the sum of electricity and chemical cost). As a result of operating the membrane filtration process for 3 years including the winter season and the high turbidity period, the filtrated water turbidity was stable to less than 0.025 NTU irrespective of changes in the turbidity of raw water. And the CIP(Clean In Place) cycle turned out to be more than 1 year. Based on the results of this study, the membrane filtration process showed high performance of water quality, and it was also determined to have the economics and operation stability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hong, S.K., Lee, Y.H., Jung, B.S., Choi, S.I., (2004). Present condition and future of membrane advanced water treatment system, KSCE, 52-11, pp. 28-31.
  2. Institute of Construction Technology, KUMHO E&C. (2011). The New Environmental Technology Verification No. 138, KEITI.
  3. Jang, E. S., Jang, H. N., Park, M. G., Kang, S. H., S., Kim, C. H., Lee, D. S. (2011). Comparison of the pre-treatment efficiency between MF and sand filtration of a desalination process using reverse osmosis membrane, The Membrane Society of Korea Spring Meeting.
  4. Ju, J.K., (2007). The Comparison of Treatment Efficiency of Conventional Treatment Process and Microfiltration Membrane Process, Kyungnam University, pp. 7-10.
  5. KWWA. (2010). Standards for Waterwork Facilities, MOE. p. 426.
  6. Lim, J.L., Lee, K.H.., Lee, Y.J., Park, J.Y., Lee, Y.R.. (2012). Optimum Chemical Cleaning Conditions for Ceramic Microfiltration Membrane Process, membrane, pp. 461-469.
  7. MOE. (2011). Assessment of pathogenic microorganism treatment standards according to membrane module and development of membrane maintenance manual. pp. 1-497.
  8. MOE. (2015). The water supply statics, pp. 1-31.
  9. US-EPA. (2001). Low-pressure membrane filtration for pathogen removal, EPA 815-C-01-001, pp. 7-9.
  10. US-EPA. (2005). Membrane filtration guidance manual, EPA-815-R-06-009.
  11. US-CDPH. (2011). CDPH DDWEM Technical Programs Branch.

피인용 문헌

  1. Investigation of Membrane Fouling Materials in I Membrane Water Treatment Plant by Analyzing Discharge Liquid from CIP Processes and the Flux Test using the Mini-Modules vol.41, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2019.41.3.117