Korean Journal of Remote Sensing (대한원격탐사학회지)

Korean Society of Remote Sensing (대한원격탐사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the Estimated Result of Ecosystem Service Value Using Pixel-based and Object-based Analysis

화소 및 객체기반 분석기법을 활용한 생태계서비스 가치 추정 결과 비교

  • 문지윤 (한국항공우주연구원 위성활용총괄팀) ;
  • 김윤수 (한국항공우주연구원 위성활용총괄팀)
  • Received : 2017.11.06
  • Accepted : 2017.12.12
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Despite the continuing effort to estimate the value of function and services of ecosystem, most of the researches has used low and medium resolution satellite imagery such as MODIS or Landsat. It means that the researches to measure the ecosystem service value using VHR (Very High Resolution) satellite imagery have not been performed much, while the source of available VHR imagery is increasing. Thus, the aim of this study is to estimate and compare the result of ecosystem service value over Sejong city, S. Korea, which is one of the rapidly changed city, through the pixel-based and object-based classification analysis using VHR KOMPSAT-3 images, for more specific and precise information. In the result of the classification, forest and grassland were underestimated while agriculture and urban were overestimated in the pixel-based result compared to the object-based result. Furthermore, bare soil area was presented contrasting result that was increased in the pixel-based result, however, decreased in the object-based result. Using those results, ecosystem service values were estimated. The annual ecosystem service values in 2014 were $8.18 million USD(pixel-based) and $8.63 million USD(object-based), however, decreased to $7.80 million USD(pixel-based) and $8.62 million USD(object-based) in 2016. It is expected to use those results as a preliminary data when to make sustainable development plan and policy to improve the quality of life in the local level.

오늘날 생태계가 인간에게 제공하는 기능과 서비스의 가치를 측정하고자 하는 노력이 지속적으로 이어지고 있으나, 지금까지 수행된 연구들의 대다수는 Landsat이나 MODIS와 같은 중저해상도의 위성영상을 활용해 왔다. 최근 들어 가용할 수 있는 고해상도 위성영상이 많아지는 데 비해 고해상도 영상을 활용한 생태계서비스 가치 추정 연구는 많이 이루어지지 않은 것이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 생태계서비스 가치를 좀 더 정밀하게 분석하고자 최근 들어 가장 많은 변화가 발생하였던 세종시 지역에 대한 고해상도 KOMPSAT-3 영상을 활용하여 화소 및 객체기반 분류를 수행한 후, 생태계서비스 가치 추정 결과를 비교하였다. 화소 및 객체기반 토지피복분류 결과, 화소기반 분류에서 산림과 초지는 상대적으로 과소평가되고 농경지와 시가지는 과대평가되는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 나지의 경우에는 화소기반 분류 결과에서는 증가하였고 객체기반 분류 결과에서는 감소하여 상반된 결과를 보였다. 이러한 토지피복 분류 결과를 토대로 연구지역 전체의 생태계서비스 가치를 추정한 결과, 2014년 기준 연간 약 818만(화소기반 결과) 달러와 863만(객체기반 결과) 달러에서 2016년에는 약 780만(화소기반 결과) 달러와 862만(객체기반 결과) 달러로 감소하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구 결과는 지역적 차원에서의 지속가능한 도시 개발 및 삶의 질 향상을 위한 정책 등을 수립하는 데 기초 자료로서 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barbosa, C.C.A., P.M. Atkinson, and J.A. Dearing, 2015. Remote sensing of ecosystem services: A systematic review, Ecological Indicators, 52: 430-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.007
  2. Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. Belt, 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387: 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  3. Daily, G.C., 1997. Introduction: What are ecosystem services?, Island Press, Washington DC, USA.
  4. de Groot, R.S., M.A. Wilson, and R.M.J. Boumans, 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, Ecological Economics, 41: 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  5. Duro, D.C., S.E. Franklin, and M.G. Dube, 2012. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 118: 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.020
  6. Grunewald, K., H. Herold, S. Marzelli, G. Meinel, B. Richter, R. Syrbe, and U. Walz, 2016. Assessment of ecosystem services at the national level in Germany - Illustration of the concept and the development of indicators by way of the example wood provision, Ecological Indicators, 70: 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.010
  7. Kim, H.O. and J.M. Yeom, 2012. A study on objectbased image analysis methods for land cover classification in agricultural areas, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 15(4): 26-41 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2012.15.4.026
  8. Konarska, K.M., P.C. Sutton, and M. Castellon, 2002. Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets, Ecological Economics, 41(3): 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00096-4
  9. Li, F., Y.P. Ye, B.W. Song, R.S. Wang, and Y. Tao, 2014. Assessing the changes in land use and ecosystem services in Changzhou municipality, People's Republic of China, 1991-2006, Ecological Indicators, 42: 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.012
  10. Na, H.S. and J.S. Lee, 2014. Analysis of land cover characteristics with object-based classification method - Focusing on the DMZ in Inje-gun, Gangwon-do, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 17(2): 121-135 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2014.17.2.121
  11. Myint, S.W., P. Gober, A. Brazel, S. Grossman-Clarke, and Q. Weng, 2011. Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 115: 1145-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.017
  12. Park, M.J., J.B. Jeon, J.A. Choi, E.J. Kim, and C.S. Im, 2016. Analysis of ecosystem service value change using a land cover map, The Korean Journal of Community Living Science, 27(S): 681-688 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2016.27.2.681
  13. Ryu, D.H. and D.K. Lee, 2013. Evaluation on ecosystem value of the greenbelt's ecosystem services in the Seoul metropolitan region, Journal of Korea Planning Association, 48(3): 279-292 (in Korean with English abstract).
  14. Whiteside, T.G., G.S. Boggs, and S.W. Maier, 2011. Comparing object-based and pixel-based classifica - tions for mapping savannas, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13: 884-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.06.008
  15. Zhao, B., U. Kreuter, B. Li, Z. Ma, J. Chen, and N. Nakagoshi, 2004. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China, Land Use Policy, 21(2): 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.003