DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Learning fiberoptic intubation for awake nasotracheal intubation

  • Kim, Hyuk (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • So, Eunsun (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Karm, Myong-Hwan (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Jeong (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seo, Kwang-Suk (Department of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2017.12.11
  • Accepted : 2017.12.26
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Background: Fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation (FNI) is performed if it is difficult to open the mouth or if intubation using laryngoscope is expected to be difficult. However, training is necessary because intubation performed by inexperienced operators leads to complications. Methods: Every resident performed intubation in 40 patients. Success of FNI was evaluated as the time of FNI. First intubation time was restricted to 2 min 30 s. If the second attempt was unsuccessful, it was considered a failed case, and a specialist performed nasotracheal intubation. If the general method of intubation was expected to be difficult, awake intubation was performed. The degree of nasal bleeding during intubation was also evaluated. Results: The mean age of the operators (11 men, 7 women) was 27.8 years. FNI was performed in a total of 716 patients. The success rate was 88.3% for the first attempt and 94.6% for the second attempt. The failure rate of intubation in anesthetized patients was 4.9%, and 13.6% in awake patients. When intubation was performed in anesthetized patients, the failure rate from the first to fifth trial was 9.6%, which decreased to 0.7% when the number of trials increased to > 30 times. In terms of awake intubation, there was no failed attempt when the resident had performed the FNI > 30 times. The number of FNIs performed and nasal bleeding were important factors influencing the failure rate. Conclusion: The success rate of FNI increased as the number of FNI performed by residents increased despite the nasal bleeding.

Keywords

References

  1. Mahmood S, Lowe T. Management of epistaxis in the oral and maxillofacial surgery setting: An update on current practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95: 23-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.10
  2. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: An updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2
  3. Delaney KA, Hessler R. Emergency flexible fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A report of 60 cases. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17: 919-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(88)80672-3
  4. Ovassapian A, Yelich SJ, Dykes MH, Brunner EE. Fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation--incidence and causes of failure. Anesth Analg 1983; 62: 692-5.
  5. Smith JE, Jackson AP, Hurdley J, Clifton PJ. Learning curves for fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation when using the endoscopic video camera. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 101-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.23-az023.x
  6. Ovassapian A, Yelich SJ, Dykes MH, Golman ME. Learning fibreoptic intubation: Use of simulators v. Traditional teaching. Br J Anaesth 1988; 61: 217-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/61.2.217
  7. Dalal PG, Dalal GB, Pott L, Bezinover D, Prozesky J, Bosseau Murray W. Learning curves of novice anesthesiology residents performing simulated fibreoptic upper airway endoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 802-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-011-9542-2
  8. Johnson C, Roberts JT. Clinical competence in the performance of fiberoptic laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: A study of resident instruction. J Clin Anesth 1989; 1: 344-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(89)90073-1
  9. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, Cheney FW. Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 828-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199005000-00010
  10. Bailie R, Posner KL. New trends in adverse respiratory events. ASA Newsletter 2011; 75: 28-9.
  11. Huitink JM, Lie PP, Heideman I, Jansma P, Greif R, Schagen Nv, et al. A prospective, cohort evaluation of major and minor airway management complications during routine anaesthetic care at an academic medical centre. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 42-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13640
  12. Buis ML, Maissan IM, Hoeks SE, Klimek M, Stolker RJ. Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: A systematic review. Resuscitation 2016; 99: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.005
  13. Ovassapian A. Fiberoptic Airway Endoscopy in Anesthesia and Critical Care In: Fiberoptic tracheal intubation. New York, Raven Press. 1990, pp57-79.
  14. Korttila K, Tarkkanen J, Tarkkanen L. Comparison of laryngotracheal and ultrasonic nebulizer administration of lidocaine in local anaesthesia for bronchoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1981; 25: 161-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01628.x
  15. Somerson SJ, Sicilia MR. AANA journal course: update for nurse anesthetists--beyond the laryngoscope: advanced techniques for difficult airway management. AANA J 1993; 61: 64-71.
  16. Machata AM, Gonano C, Holzer A, Andel D, Spiss CK, Zimpfer M, et al. Awake nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation: Patient comfort, intubating conditions, and hemodynamic stability during conscious sedation with remifentanil. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 904-8.
  17. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb08932.x
  18. Collins SR, Blank RS. Fiberoptic intubation: An overview and update. Respir Care 2014; 59: 865-78. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03012
  19. Nasa VK, Kamath SS. Risk factors assessment of the difficult intubation using intubation difficulty scale (IDS). J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: GC01-3.
  20. Kim HW, Seo KS, Shin TJ, Kim HJ. The effect of laryngeal view grade and intraoral bleeding on intubation difficulty during fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. J Korean Dent Soc Anesthesiol 2009; 9: 91-7. https://doi.org/10.17245/jkdsa.2009.9.2.91
  21. Sanuki T, Hirokane M, Kotani J. Epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation: A comparison of nostril sides. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 618-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.097
  22. Lai HC, Chang YH, Huang RC, Hung NK, Lu CH, Chen JH, et al. Efficacy of sevoflurane as an adjuvant to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for attenuating secretions in ocular surgery. Medicine 2017; 96: e6729. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006729
  23. O'Connell JE, Stevenson DS, Stokes MA. Pathological changes associated with short-term nasal intubation. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 347-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07746.x
  24. Morimoto Y, Sugimura M, Hirose Y, Taki K, Niwa H. Nasotracheal intubation under curve-tipped suction catheter guidance reduces epistaxis. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 295-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022218
  25. Elwood T, Stillions DM, Woo DW, Bradford HM, Ramamoorthy C. Nasotracheal intubation: A randomized trial of two methods. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 51-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200201000-00014
  26. Kameyama K, Watanabe S, Kano T, Kusukawa J. Effects of nasal application of an epinephrine and lidocaine mixture on the hemodynamics and nasal mucosa in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66: 2226-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.013
  27. Kwon MA, Song J, Kim S, Ji SM, Bae J. Inspection of the nasopharynx prior to fiberoptic-guided nasotracheal intubation reduces the risk epistaxis. J Clin Anesth 2016; 32: 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.016

Cited by

  1. Orotracheal intubation in a patient with difficult airway by using fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A case report vol.18, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.2.125
  2. A prospective randomized trial of xylometazoline drops and epinephrine merocele nasal pack for reducing epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation vol.20, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.223
  3. Managing the difficult airway : A survey of doctors with different seniority in China vol.100, pp.38, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000027181
  4. Emergent tracheostomy during the pandemic of COVID-19: Slovenian National Recommendations vol.278, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06318-8