DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 생막걸리에서 분리한 야생 효모의 특성

Characteristics of wild yeast isolated from non-sterilized Makgeolli in Korea

  • 정수지 (국립농업과학원 농식품자원부) ;
  • 여수환 (국립농업과학원 농식품자원부) ;
  • 문지영 (국립농업과학원 농식품자원부) ;
  • 최한석 (국립농업과학원 농식품자원부) ;
  • 백성열 (국립농업과학원 농식품자원부)
  • Jung, Su Ji (Department of Agro-food Resource, National Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Yeo, Soo-Hwan (Department of Agro-food Resource, National Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Mun, Ji-Young (Department of Agro-food Resource, National Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Choi, Han-Seok (Department of Agro-food Resource, National Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Baek, Seong Yeol (Department of Agro-food Resource, National Institute of Agricultural Science)
  • 투고 : 2017.09.29
  • 심사 : 2017.11.14
  • 발행 : 2017.11.30

초록

본 연구는 각 지역의 생막걸리에서 분리된 야생 효모의 다앙한 발효학적 특성을 조사하기 위해 34종을 수집하고 효모를 분리, 동정하였다. 야생효모는 62 균주로 분리되었고, 26S rDNA 염기서열을 분석한 결과, Saccharomyces cerevisiae와 Pichia kudriavzevii로 동정 되었다. 62개의 균주들 중 발효학적 특성이 우수한 균주들을 선발하기 위해 황화수소와 $CO_2$ 생성능, 알코올 내성, 응집성 및 향기 성분 생성능을 분석하였다. 알코올 내성과 $CO_2$ 생성능의 상관성을 확인하기 위해 주성분분석(Principal Components Analysis)을 하였다. PC1 양의 방향에 강하게 부하되는 균주는 YM37, YM31, YM32, YM22로 분석되었으며, 총 0.14-0.18 g/72 h의 $CO_2$ 생성으로 대조군에 비해 높은 발효능을 보였고, 이들 중 YM22를 제외하고 불쾌취인 황화수소를 생성하지 않았다. 또한 이 4개의 균주들은 알코올 내성 15% 이상을 보유하며, 응집성은 0.5-1.0 mL 사이인 flocculation type으로 확인되었다. API 분석 및 cerulenin, TFL 저항성을 실험한 결과, 향기성분 생성능이 좋은 효모는 황화수소와 알코올 내성, 응집성 실험에서 우수한 발효학적 특성을 보인 YM37, YM31, YM32, YM22를 포함한 총 33개로 확인되었다. 이러한 결과를 통해 우리나라 생막걸리에서 분리한 야생 효모의 알코올 발효 및 향미 특성을 확인하였으며, 분리된 야생 효모는 주류 제조의 종균 효모로 이용 가능성을 확인하였다.

Wild yeasts were isolated from domestic non-sterilized Makgeolli and their fermentation characteristics were analyzed to select the best fermentation seed culture. A total of 65 yeast strains isolated yeasts from non-sterilized Makgeolli and Nuruk. In order to select fermentable strains, hydrogen sulfide, $CO_2$ production ability, alcohol tolerance and aroma component production ability were analyzed. To screen the aromatic strains of isolates, media containing cerulenin, 5,5,5-trifluor-DL-leucine (TFL) and API ZYM kit were used. There were 36 strains resistance to cerulenin and all strains produced esterase and demonstrated tolerance against TFL. Hydrogen sulfide, which could degrade the quality of the fermented beverage, was not produced in 34 yeast. The correlation between alcohol tolerance of yeast and carbon dioxide production was analyzed by principal component analysis. YM22, YM31, YM32 and YM37 produced a total of 0.14-0.18 g/72 h of $CO_2$ indicating high fermentability. Alcohol tolerance was measured by alcohol concentration. YM32, YM37 yeast had 20% alcohol tolerance. As a result, alcohol and flavor characteristics of wild yeast isolated from non-sterilized Makgeolli were analyzed and it was confirmed that yeast was suitable for the production of alcohol.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee TJ, Hwang DY, Lee CY, Son HJ (2009) Changes in yeast cell number, total acid and organic acid during production and distribution processes of Makgeolli, traditional alcohol of Korea. Korean J Microbiol, 45, 391-396
  2. Jung SJ, Chung CH (2017) Production and properties of ale beer with Nuruk, a Korean fermentation starter. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 49, 132-140 https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2017.49.2.132
  3. Lee YS, Seol JM, Jeong DY, Kim SR (2016) Application of functional microbial strains isolated from traditional rice wine in Korea. Microbiol Biotechnol Lett, 44, 229-235 https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1605.05002
  4. Kim HR, Kwon YH, Jo SJ, Kin JH, Ahn BH (2009) Characterization and volatile flavor components in glutinous rice wines prepared with different yeasts of Nuruks. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 41, 296-301
  5. Jung SJ (2015) Beer production and properties using Nuruk, a Korean fermentation starter. MS Thesis, Sejong University, Korea, p 10-14
  6. Choi DH, Park EH, Kim MD (2014) Characterization of starch-utilizing yeast Saccharomycopsis fibuligera isolated from Nuruk. Korean J Microbiol Biotechnol, 42, 407-412 https://doi.org/10.4014/kjmb.1409.09006
  7. Jeong ST, Kwak HJ, Kim SM (2013) Quality characteristics and biogenic amine production of Makgeolli brewed with commercial Nuruks. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 45, 727-734 https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2013.45.6.727
  8. Baek SY, Lee YJ, Kim MD, YI JH, Mun JY Yeo SH (2015) Characterization of ethanol fermentation with wild type yeast strains. Microbiol Biotechnol Lett, 43, 227-235 https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1507.07002
  9. Baek SY, Lee YJ, Kim JH, Yeo SH (2015) Isolation and characterization of wild yeasts for improving liquor flavor and quality. Microbiol Biotechnol Lett, 43, 56-64 https://doi.org/10.4014/mbl.1502.02007
  10. Baek CH, Choi JH, Choi HS, Jeong ST, Kim JH, Jong YJ, Yeo SH (2013) Quality characteristics of brown rice Makgeolli produced under differing conditions. Korean J Microbiol Biotechnol, 41, 168-175 https://doi.org/10.4014/kjmb.1210.10005
  11. Lee JW, Shim JY (2010) Quality characteristics of Makgeolli during freezing storage. Food Eng Prog, 14, 328-334
  12. Lee DH, Kim JH, Lee JS (2009) Effect of pears on the quality and physiological functionality of Makgeoly. Korean J Food Nutr, 22, 606-611
  13. Kim GW, Lee JH, Lee SA, Shim JY (2012) Brewing characteristics of grape-Makgeolli. Food Eng Prog, 16, 263-269
  14. Park MJ, Kim HK, Choi KK, Koo BY, Lee SK (2016) Fermentation characteristics of Makgeolli containing Aronia (Aronia melanocarpa, Black chokeberry). Korean J Food Sci Technol, 48, 27-35 https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2016.48.1.27
  15. Lee HL, Kang KW, Seo DH, Jung JH, Jung DH, Kim GW, Park SY, Shin WC, Shim HS, Park CS (2015) Diversity of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in Makgeolli and their production of ${\gamma}$-aminobutyric acid. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 47, 204-210 https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2015.47.2.204
  16. Park JH, Chung CH (2014) Characteristics of Takju (a cloudy Korean rice wine) prepared with Nuruk (a traditional Korean rice wine fermentation starter), and identification of lactic acid bacteria in Nuruk. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 46, 153-164 https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2014.46.2.153
  17. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol, 30, 2725-2729 https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  18. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining methods: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol, 4, 406-425
  19. Comitini F, Gobbi M, Domizio P, Romani D, Lencioni L, Mannazzu I, Ciani M (2011) Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Microbiol, 28, 873-882 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.12.001
  20. Tracey R.P, Simpson E (1986) Effect of rehydration temperature of active dried yeast on wine production and quality. S Afr J Enol Vitic, 7, 66-70
  21. Helm E, Nohr B, Torne RSW (1953) The measurement of yeast flocculation and its significance in brewing. Wallerstein communications, 11, 315-326
  22. Viana F, Gil JV, Genoves S, Valles S, Manzanares P (2008) Rational selection of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts for mixed starters based on ester formation and enological traits. Food Microbiol, 25, 778-785 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2008.04.015
  23. Kim YR, Moon ST, Park SK (2008) Effects of yeast strains and fermentation temperatures in production of hydrogen sulfide during beer fermentation. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 40, 238-242
  24. Verstrepen KJ, Derdelinckx G, Verachtert H, Delvaux FR (2003) Yeast flocculation: what brewers should know. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 61, 197-205 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-1200-8
  25. Burns JA (1937) Yeast flocculation. J Inst Brew, 43, 31-43 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1937.tb05711.x
  26. Seo DJ, Yeo SH, Mun JY, Jung WJ, Cho YS, Baek SY (2015) Characteristics of yeast with low temperature adaptation for Yakju brewed. Korean J Food Preserv, 22, 908-914 https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2015.22.6.908
  27. Verstrepen KJ, Derdelinckx G, Dufour JP, Winderickx J, Thevelein JM, Pretorius IS, Delvaux FR (2003) Flavor-Active Esters: Adding Fruitiness to Beer. J Biosci Bioeng, 96, 110-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(03)90112-5